You have to crawl before your able to walk. Besides when I said thousands of dollars I meant to say hundreds of thounsands of dollars.
Donāt ask me what I think about vegetariansā¦
And men are merely fulfilling what comes natural to themā¦
Iām not a fan of dreamsā¦
Sure.
I think itās the victimization personality.
What ever happened to the realistic view in taking responsibility for oneās own emotions? We have a bunch of fictional rights to do all of that for us where personal responsibility isnāt needed anymore.
( Weāve become lazy, weak and naively shallow over a hundred years or two.)
Your naivety and ignorance is illuminating. All sex acts require force and instigation. This instigation is propelled by the will to power in male-gendered animals. Consent is the cultural delusion that I have already explained. I do not desire to repeat what I have already stated about that. Comment on it if you seek to establish a reasonable discussion with me.
Feminine, negative emotional responses are not the result of what you call unnatural. Humanity commits all actions naturally. The supposed-harm from the context is also cultural. Pain and pleasure are experienced differently within every individual person and animal. All animals may feel pain, but this does not mean that the pain is good or bad. For example, in knife-fighting, fencing, or boxing, fighters are trained to sometimes step into the opponent to defend themselves even though the natural reaction of a person may be to flee from the threat of injury. Rather then step back and be cut by the knife, they should sometimes step forward and counter the blow. This is the fight-or-flight response as itās known. When a person is harmed, then they have nobody to blame except themselves unless they are children or handicapped. Nowadays, people enjoy to blame others, but they have nobody to blame but themselves. Consequently, the shaken baby, the rape victim, and the bully victim have nobody to blame but themselves. At first this seems ridiculous, but not when you generalize the issue. What setup the situations for these negative harms to occur? The answer is control, force, and dominance. The response and reactions to these powers are what I have already mentioned. When a young girl cries, she is allowed to expose her weakness. When a young boy cries, he is not allowed to expose his weakness. It is culturally defined from that point outward.
I need no support for my arguments. Everything I say is substantiated by the words I speak. Everything more is validation that you require for me to convince you. I am not here to do that for you, because your naivety speaks for itself. You must teach yourself if you wish to truly learn something or anything.
I am a great believer in the power of laughter to heal. What I was referring to was a moment when someone is really in emotional or physical pain, I donāt feel this is a good time to crack a joke or be funny ā even if someoneās heart is in the right place. Of course, if you do know a person well and feel they would respond to laughter, despite their āconditionā, then Iād say "go for it, it can only help. That too would be empathy I think. I think it really depends on the amount of pain and the kind. If a friend is feeling sorry for him/her-self, humor sometimes is a great way to draw that other person out of that self-pity ā it helps them to see that they are taking themself too seriously.
Would you agree or disagree that there is a time for humor or not, depending on the degree of pain of whatever kind?
I wonder why it is that we laugh when we bang our elbow and it hurts so much? Is it really because there is a funny bone there?
