Well, being in paradise for eternity, where the only thing I can do is pray and obey God’s commands, is not exactly what I would describe as ideal place to live.
You will do what God decides because it’s his decision whether truth is revealed to you.
Thus free will does not exist?
Free will does exist…you can choose….you presently choose to oppose him.
Well, if my binary options are:
-
stay for eternity in a place where I act like a servant,
-
stay in a place of eternal torture,
then I do not see good choices to exercise my free will. Both will cause me mental suffering.
PS: Somehow, the God that offers me only these choices is all loving…
1 is still better than 2…God created everything even beings like the devil and his demons who choose to oppose him.
Hmmm… so there is in-balance in the binary world. One is better than the other.
Yes, because time is relative. Very cool example about the pigeon, it probably is experiencing the oncoming car as what to us humans would be like slow motion.
I used to get confused about the concept of time, is it just change measured by something else that is not changing? But everything is changing, at least a little bit even if we do not notice. Molecules vibrate, atoms experience constant energetic changes inside themselves, only the illusion of stasis emerges at higher macro scales. But then I thought that stasis would appear to be possible from a certain more micro-perspective looking at something very macro. We might look at the stars in the sky and think they are static because we cannot see them moving with our eyes, but then we notice over time they are drifting slowly across the sky. And yet to those stars themselves, they could be traveling through the galaxy at 500,000 mph like our sun and solar system are. That is an example of the relativity of velocity, but you can start to see how that relativity and the relativity of time are interlinked together via the shared reality of change.
For a velocity to be changing (i.e. movement) there must be ‘time’ passing, yet what is the passage of time other than movement itself? Einstein was correct to discover how time and velocity (‘space’) are different aspects of the same thing, hence how relativity explains that if we are moving faster time is slower for us compared to someone who is moving slower. There is a finite amount of energy that can be involved, if we use some of it for movement in space there is less available for movement in time. In this way I believe ‘time’ (change) is something calculated down at Planck levels and scales upward to macro levels like our own; when we are moving or accelerating less system energy in that particular frame is available for doing those change-calculations, hence time actually starts to slow down.
1 Like
Einstein wasn’t right at all because energy can only be produced in the cosmos by the vibratory interaction of spinning particles…Einstein was absolutely clueless how actual reality science works..
We should separate time itself from the experience of time, and what is interesting is that we can experience time differently even if time itself is not moving differently for us. If we are engaged in something interesting time might fly by, compared to if we are sitting bored doing nothing time might crawl by.
The more changing that is going on, the faster time may seem to move, which makes sense because time itself is really nothing other than change.
I think all of those change calculations are handled down at the bottom of reality in the Planck scale as pure mathematics, and everything above that is simulated as a result of those calculations.
Planck scale energies are quantized, digital, like a 1 or 0. That is how I see reality as a huge computer. As Einstein showed, when some of the energy in a system is being used to produce change in motion there is less energy available to be used to produce change in ‘time’ (overall change-calculations of the system itself). Time begins to slow down. But what happens if you become smaller and smaller like you said?
If you become smaller, your ‘system’ is shrinking closer to the Planck scale. This also means it is objectively becoming simpler in terms of size/volume. There is less “stuff” to calculate changes for (but also perhaps less available energy to do those calculations?)
Maybe the experience of time subjectively depends on the complexity and available energy in our brains. If you shrunk to the size of a dust mite, but kept your brain as it is (assuming that would even be possible to shrink neurons and they would still function the same way as they do now) then you would probably experience time in the same subjective pace, but what you would see and experience around you would of course be very different.
Bro, just saying “vibratory” and “binary” isn’t an argument. That is all you ever say and it does not refute Einstein or anything else, at least not until you explain how.
That’s what I was looking for Prof…
And this:
Einstein hadn’t the first clue about many things…He didn’t understand how vibration works in science…he had no concept whatsoever that binary code needs to be produced in the cosmos …and when it came to consciousness and his relationship to it…again he was utterly clueless…Science has proven that his theories are total BS…..All matter is entering and exiting the multiple holes at at centre of the multiple galaxies thus proving he hadn’t the first clue what he was talking about.He even said himself that his theories didn’t work inside holes.That was the only claim he did get right.
Guys,you not interested in reality or truth….….you only concern yourselves with a misrepresentation of it….you admit this…because you falsely
claim that everything is an illusion.
The individual sees;hears and feels binary data because binary data is converted into visions;sounds and sensations.Forget Einstein’s BS theories they don’t explain reality……they are nonsense theories and always have been nonsense theories designed to pamper to the unbelieving masses as Nikola Tesla stated…..Give the people what they want even if it’s BS doesn’t help anyone.
You realize you haven’t contributed anything to the discussion right? Just saying “binary data” means nothing. You need to learn how to explain your point, make an actual argument.
It gets worse..
Forget gravity…forget the word electromagnetism….forget the strong and weak nuclear forces……forget them….they don’t exist in reality…..they are the man made forces of misrepresentation of reality science.
Btw Tesla also thought that EM had one repulsion and one attraction, not 2 of each.
1 Like
You need 4 off electromagnetic force interactions to get matter to vibrate such that binary code is produced…NN,NS,SN,SS…..2 attractions and 2 repulsions..
I have contributed 100% more than you though ProfessorX….people want hear about reality ….not misrepresentations of it.
1 Like