Well even according to Tesla, NN and SS are the same thing written down twice. NS and SN are also the same thing written down twice. Now what? 
tautology
/tô-tŏl′ə-jē/
noun
- Needless repetition of the same sense in different words; redundancy.
- An instance of such repetition.
- (Logic) An empty or vacuous statement composed of simpler statements in a fashion that makes it logically true whether the simpler statements are factually true or false; for example, the statement Either it will rain tomorrow or it will not rain tomorrow.
1 Like
Maybe the philosophical takeaway here could be that electromegnetism is inherently a closed loop phenomenon when it comes to magnets (with no actual N and S point on the closed loop), and also relativistic. But human thinking is inherently linear.
It’s just humanly impossible to 100% correctly conceptualize a loop phenomenon using linear thinking. The two are incompatible. Some people do a better job conceptualizing it, some like Jupiter do a worse job.
Unite the 4 off force interactions NN,NS,SN,SS to get the push/pull formula N/S=N/S……It’s this formula that holds all matter together (vibrating).It can only be this formula because only this formula produces binary code data.
I do a perfect job of conceptualising it Alta.
I am teaching you…you are not teaching me….I know how reality science works…..you don’t.
I’m not sure if that counts as linear, it is procedural though and doesn’t use loop constructs..
—edit No, it doesn’t count, of course not. You’re probably definitely right.
1 Like
Whether any of you like it or not or accept it or not is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT, you interpret varying frequency electromagnetic binary energy waves emitted from vibrating matter.
These waves of varying frequency energy are picked up by your biological machine body senses.The machine then converts the binary data contained within these waves of energy into visions;sounds and sensations which you interpret.
We don’t really need the non-existent second EM force for the non-existent binary code data..
Give up Atla you are being totally embarrassed and this will continue.
Ok bro. But now please feel free to explain it. Not just state it for the thousandth time already.
Ok?
I honestly feel like you are not really saying anything at all. Or maybe English is not your first language.
We already know matter vibrates. We already know waves represent a binary based on their recurring peaks and troughs. And we already know energy emits from matter (e.g. electrons emitting photons). And we know our body’s senses pick up these emitted energies and convert them into subjective sensations and sense impressions which form part of our consciousness. None of this is new or contested information. So what are you really saying here?
I have explained it….you figure it out…..it’s not that complicated….REALITY science isn’t complicated.
1 Like
Thanks for playing 
I win when I play loser…
1 Like
Running away is a win only in your own mind 
I have explained the science to you ProfessorX …a child could understand it.
God’s reality science is very simple to understand.
Nobody understands misrepresentation of reality science because it’s total man made BS.
1 Like
I was thinking about this some more on my walk. Relativity explains how space and time are aspects of the same thing, change in one means change in the other. This as I understand it is based on underlying available energy needed to keep the simulation going. Each region of reality can be objectively defined as x number of Planck cubes. Little 1x1x1 Planck volumes at the bottom of our existence (putting aside for the moment the question or whether or not there is anything further down). Well maybe even the volume and area are simulation and we need to go to Planck length itself. But how do we figure out how many Planck lengths there are in a given region of existence?
I looked up how many Planck lengths there are in a cube meter. The answer is supposedly:
24,410,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
That’s …a lot.
Let’s assume each one of those is one unit of energy for the continuous calculations of change. What I mean is, mathematically down at that baseline level of existence there is really nothing but “numbers”, raw quantity interacting according to basic logic. This is quantized/digitized, so energy from one spot changes instantly according to energy in another spot. This means the whole setup, no matter how large it is, can actually function “at once” as a single coherent thing. The universe itself. There is an underlying common unit-value of time, it is “0” or instant-speed. That is because the distance between one Planck length and another, whether we talk about space or time distances, is mathematically collapsed to 0.
Yet energy exists here. Or at least, raw numbers, values in calculation. Think about a computer with the number of transistors equal to the huge number above. That computer would have access to so much potential computing power. Each one of those Planck lengths as a bit, 1 or 0 since it is quantized at that level. Therefore as energy is moving “instantly” at that level across that massive number of bits, calculations are occurring or can be said to emerge. I see this as the source of the simulation, i.e. reality as we experience it.
Bringing this back to time and space: the more energy (the greater the number of Planck lengths in a given region) devoted to calculating real time changes in motion in space means less energy/Planck lengths that can be devoted to calculating real time changes in motion in time. What we experience as space or time are both “illusions” (from the perspective of the Planck lengths themselves, had they perspectives at all) which is not to say they do not exist and are not also very real (for us, and not only for us, since it is true that even a simulation still objectively exists as it does). So Einstein is explained here, the link between space and time dilation in relativity. What about mass? As velocity increases so does mass, according to Einstein. But what is “mass”?
Mass seems to be the pull one part of reality has on the other parts around it. The “influence” of it. Clearly that is linked to gravity because we literally observe that pull and “influence”, it is exactly what we experience and measure as gravity itself. But what if gravity is just another way of saying mass, what if mass is just a part of the simulation that calculates necessary influence/pressure of one thing upon another? We tend to think of mass as equal to the amount of ‘stuff’ packed into a given volume, and I don’t think that is wrong but it might be only part of the answer. That ‘stuff’ being packed in (molecules, atoms etc) are really just mathematical wave-functions or probability waveforms according to quantum mechanics. So their “physicality” is an illusion. Which means our intuition of mass as being equal to the amount of stuff packed physically into a given volume is also incorrect, at least on this more fundamental level.
So mass is probably part of the calculations-going-on in the Planck universal computer-level of existence having to do with which manifested aspects of a given region of existence will have what kind of influence or necessary “force” against other things and why. If one mass bumps into another they resist, generating a force as Newton described, but we know that deeper down this is just orbiting clouds of electrons in each object resisting each other due to mutually repelling negative EM fields. All of that is just mathematical calculation as far as I see it. So mass becomes just another component needing to be continuously calculated-as-change in real time by the baseline ‘Planck computer of existence’ (for any given region of existence we want to talk about). Mass, space, and time are all being calculated like this, and there is a finite number of compute power available equal to the number of Planck lengths in a given region.
Why does mass therefore increase at higher speeds? Maybe: As speed increases, calculation requirement in terms of that object (region of existence) which is increasing in speed becomes more and more complex and energy intensive as the object’s speed gets faster and faster. Why? Because there is more to calculate, the object is encountering more and more reality around itself in the same unit time. All of this needs to be handled in real time by the computer. As the intensity of calculations increases and more energy is drawn away from “time” calculation to manage vector changes in space, the “influence” of that region of space is also increasing. Why? Because of the sheer power of all that computing going on to manage the constant vector changes and the fact this region of existence, when it encounters something else ahead of itself as it is moving, is going to exert a more profound effect upon that other region by virtue of its increasing speed. This is expressed as the given region itself becoming more massive, more able to change or move or impact other regions around it.
Time slowing down is also easy to understand in this context because “time” as in the totality of the pace of time across the entire region is more like a background phenomenon or secondary emergent effect, more like a leftover necessity to the system itself. Time in this way is like the context of change which is summed as the average of all total changes going on within that region at once, flattened out or curved toward a baseline common value so as to keep that particular region more or less held together and not tearing itself apart.
No idea if any of that answers your original question though 
1 Like
Now that’s art!!! Have you done it with chatgpt?
To be completely honest, neither do I. But this:
“That is because the distance between one Planck length and another, whether we talk about space or time distances, is mathematically collapsed to 0.”
Well yeah.. from our perspective.. that’s what we can handle at this scale.. do you see what I’m getting at?
Gravity isn’t a force LOL!!!……Electromagnetism is merely a made up BS word…..LOL!!!….The strong and weak nuclear forces needed to be invented to hold a BS broken theory together….LOL!!!
GLUONS…..LOL!!!
All invented for what reason? …lol….in order to explain a psychotics MISREPRESENTATION of reality science….lol.
Dude, I’ve been reading through this again.. even got to the point where I blasted AI with it looking for holes, is this your own idea? It’s actually quite brilliant..
Aaaand.. you didn’t mention “wave function collapse” once! Didn’t need to get my bullshit-bingo card out! Respect.
And this, apparently: 2.441 × 10¹⁰⁴ is likely to be many times more than the total number of atoms in the observable Universe.. What kind of GPU does your Universal computer need? Can it play Crysis?