Again I’ll ask: Do you have any inkling at all about the plan of each of Nietzsche’s books—Beyond Good and Evil , for example?
About the latter, you said: “[H]is focus is pretty limited and he doesn’t bother trying to build much with his ideas, mostly just complaining about various errors he notices.”
Against this, I pit: “With study, each of the chapters of Beyond Good and Evil comes to seem in its own movement and trajectory—absurdly exciting. The individual sections within the chapters receive their specific gravity from their location in the unfolding argument and from their contribution to it. But not only the chapters unfold as coherent arguments; so too do the two divisions: chapters 1-3 offer a coherent argument about philosophy [1-2] and religion [3] and the profound relation between them; chapters 5-9 offer a coherent argument about morality [5-7] and politics [8-9] culminating in the new nobility. And finally, the whole book is a coherent argument that never lets up: what is discovered about philosophy and religion, about what can be known and what might be believed, necessarily assigns the philosopher a monumental task or responsibility with respect to morals and politics.” (Lampert, Nietzsche’s Task, page 7.)
With study… But such a study requires a Strauss, a Lampert or a Meier, i.e. someone of the caliber of Kant and Hegel (BGE 211).
The great philosophers dwarf dilettantes like the OP and even, er, energetic male adolescents like AnimeHuz and my former self: