I am skeptical of this information because they send a lot of their money back to the home nations they originate from meaning there is a lot of dollars not being spent domestically here whatsoever.
Also, the owners of companies hiring illegals make billions of dollars concerning foreign cheap labor because their own labor costs are next to nothing to the profits being generated. So yes, there is obviously some lucrative profit creation, however, none of that money is going to the local communities at large that are being greatly impoverished. The only people seeing any of that money are CEOS themselves, I would hardly count that as financial growth in any meaningful sense of the term.
Yes, western nations largely dominated by the folly of Washington D.C. are hell holes riped with many societal problems internally.
There is however many of us nonetheless who live here currently that want things to change.
I am not just going to throw my hands up in the air and yell out all is lost by advocating doing nothing. I am a middle aged man with a family, it is a disservice to do nothing especially when future generations are concerned. Something has to change, of course the options available will not be easy ones as problems outnumber solutions currently.
Their tax and their daily consumer habits are sources of dollars being spent in the US, and in many cases, money sent ‘home’ is to support people living in poverty that US policies often cause. The West has been living under the illusion that its technological prowess is the reason it dominates most of the world, but it is the dollar that dominates. It is not surprising when people start doing things that help them escape poverty.
We in the West are narrow-minded, punchy illusionaries, and none more so than the US. We have been exploiting the nations we regard as inferior for centuries, and expect everybody to bow down and welcome us when we go on holiday, revealing our ideas of supremacy in a way that seems subtle to us but is clearly seen abroad.
But when these people come to us, we drive them back, or accuse them of doing what we regard as quite normal, because they are black or brown. If they’re white, there are fewer concerns, which tells a story. Another aspect is the fact that the fundamentalist and extremist tendencies in foreign countries have been promoted by US policies and influence of the CIA, as a reaction against socialism in those countries. The US built up Al Queda for example, tore down socialist governments and instigated uprisings against rulers who were not toeing the line.
Neoliberalism is a political and economic ideology that advocates for free-market capitalism
Encyclopedia Brittanica says:
Neoliberalism, ideology and policy model that emphasizes the value of free market competition.
I get the feeling you’re using the word in your own unique way. I think you think it means “today’s liberals”, or you might mean some particular faction within today’s liberals. The term you’re choosing to use isn’t commonly understood to mean the thing you probably mean.
Yes, I utilize it as today’s liberals just as I would with neoconservatives as today’s conservatives. The reason I do this is because at least yesterday’s liberals and conservatives pretended to believe in something versus the modern ones today that believe in nothing other than preserving our oligarchical form of economic capitalism.
Again, preaching to the choir, but eventually you have to ask the question, now what?
Doing nothing isn’t an option for people who live here. We need a proper way going forward politically into the future. I refuse to believe there’s nothing that can be done to improve our situation in this downward hill into the abyss we currently find ourselves.
Also, it’s not a majority of white people that supports these policies. That seems very antagonistic towards white people in general with comments like that. A majority of white people in general have no power or sway over the powerful interests that controls our government. This stance that everything is the fault of white people is a very annoying one.
I do not share your hatred of white people and ultimately such divisive rhetoric is no good for anything.
I do not share any hatred for white people, but history is very damning. If we don’t see the mistakes of the past, we are doomed to repeat them, as we are already seeing in the US.
I was in a dispute with my brother about a green issue, and we noticed that our attention is often drawn to silly issues that seem intuitively right, but when we look into them, we see that they gloss over real issues. Take for example the statement that “the cow in the field is nature,” which may seem right, but just because the animal and field come from nature, it doesn’t mean that they represent the complexity of nature.
The cow is the result of selective breeding to produce a product. The field is an area cleared for those animals, where previously trees, insects, birds etc. lived. They serve an agricultural factory production that has nothing to do with nature, except that once there was a cow that could wander because its udders were not so large, through wooded landscapes where an abundance of life was.
If we look at grain farming, ít’s even worse, and soil degradation could one day mean that we have too little to eat, and due to the systematic reduction of supply sources, no alternative when that happens. The whole thing is a systemic failure due to the crazy idea that perpetual growth in profits is possible. I’ve just mentioned a few things, but all of our problems are somehow linked to that delusional idea.
As I’ve noted, lefties find allies in the enemies of their own kind, because their own kind reminds them of their failings…
They seek retribution for nature’s injustices, redirecting their self-hatred towards those that remind them of themselves.
Xenophilia is a way of alleviating fear of the unknown and hatred of oneself…
The strange other represents salvation.
How does the insecure man relieve himself from himself?
He becomes part of a uniform whole.
This is the salvation myth of Abraham’s god…reduced to the abstraction of an all-inclusive, all-encompassing humanity.
God = humanity; Humanity = god.
Your statement treats all forms of exploitation as universal and unavoidable in nature, which oversimplifies the diversity of interactions found in natural systems. Not all relationships in nature are exploitative; many are mutualistic or neutral, such as pollination or symbiosis, where both parties benefit or are unaffected.
The term “exploitation” carries a human-centric, moral, or economic connotation, particularly regarding the use of natural resources for economic growth or development. Applying this term broadly to all of nature conflates human-driven overexploitation (which leads to environmental degradation and loss of biodiversity) with natural ecological interactions, which are often balanced by evolutionary pressures and ecosystem dynamics.
In natural ecosystems, exploitation (such as predation or resource use) is typically regulated by feedback mechanisms that maintain balance. Human exploitation, in contrast, often exceeds these natural limits, resulting in overexploitation and ecosystem collapse. Your blanket statement ignores this crucial distinction.
Herbivores exploit the work of plants.
Carnivores exploit the work of herbivores.
When you eat meat, Bob, you are exploiting the work of the animal, over a period of time, converting plant nutrients into flesh and blood.
I know your Marxist lingo, Bob.
You limit yourself to humans…because you seek refuge in the utopia of a HUMAN herd…a uniform, inclusive, herd you can feel safe within.
Watch fish schooling and birds flocking and herbivores herding…same thing.
You fear standing apart…being excluded…exposed to a world that you cannot endure for long.
I am for distinctions and balance… culling included.
I worship the gods of nature…
You fear nature, because it is unforgiving, indifferent to your human plight…a source of injustices…and so you seek refuge in human systems that protect you, and ‘correct’ these natural injustices.
You want humanity to intervene… and protect you from a world you cannot endure.
I think it isn’t about economies that consider themselves capitalist, necessarily, because you see similar disparities & exploitation in so-called communist economies. The U.S. is a mixed economy. Exploitation will only end when it is held properly accountable in every economy.
I agree that we white Europeans have done some horrific questionable things in our historic past. For me what we did to the native Americans of the entirety of North America is at the top of the list. However, I don’t think the past sins of the fathers should be transferable to those alive today, nobody currently alive today had anything to do with that. To constantly punish an entire race or ethnicity for what their fathers and grandfathers did in historical years past is beyond absurd.
Also, I don’t think white Europeans are unique in terms of genocide, slavery, or oppression, to one degree and another all different ethnicities of the world have something in their historical past that is similar.
In alternate historical timelines had the Mongolian Khanate or the Chinese explored the globe before Europeans I think the outcome would of been historically similar.
I agree there is a lot of unnatural things done in the name of power, money, or what is deemed progressivism ideologically, I think this is something we can both agree on. The striving for so called perfection is the origins of so much suffering and misery today.
If human beings are to have a future on this planet we have to work together in cooperation, to do that we must respect each other worldwide.
You’re not going to attract that mindset to white Europeans if you’re constantly telling them that they’re evil and that they have no right to simply exist, that simply will not work. That only creates more hostility and resentment.
For political and economic socialism to be successful you need to respect all people including white Europeans and through compassion or good deeds you will attract them. Through mutual respect you will attract the white working class for socialist causes.
There’s a difference between remembrance and creating policies to inflict punishment. Many such policies do exist today that are anti-white in nature because of this absurd extreme political correctness.
