You seem fine to me.
Thatâs because deceptions can be deceiving.
Aw. Whatâs got you down, pal?
Aw. Whatâs got you down, pal?
Thatâs for a different production altogether. And, once you do grow a pair, Iâll cast you as an extra.
Why is everything always so sexual with you?
Leave my balls alone.
Why is everything always so sexual with you?
Pick one:
1] genes
2] memes
3] an unimaginably complex and convoluted labyrinth of both
Leave my balls alone.
Brass balls. Balls of steel. Itâs all figurative. At least in this production.
Pick one:
1] genes
2] memes
3] an unimaginably complex and convoluted labyrinth of both
Do you all nazis read anything other than Dawkins?
I mean for an anti-objectivist, you sure hold his writings to be some objective-ass truth.
Brass balls. Balls of steel. Itâs all figurative. At least in this production.
Sends shivers down pzrâs spine.
iambiguous:Pick one:
1] genes
2] memes
3] an unimaginably complex and convoluted labyrinth of bothDo you all nazis read anything other than Dawkins?
I mean for an anti-objectivist, you sure hold his writings to be some objective-ass truth.
Error! Error! Does not compute!
Iâm sorry, but that was not one of the options.
Brass balls. Balls of steel. Itâs all figurative. At least in this production.
Sends shivers down pzrâs spine.
Okay, if you were not scripting the production, how might that not fit into it?
Error! Error! Does not compute!
Iâm sorry, but that was not one of the options.
Well, you know, to be fair, in typical objectivist fashion.
Thatâs always a problem for objectivists, when a human source for their universal truths is identified.
iambiguous:Error! Error! Does not compute!
Iâm sorry, but that was not one of the options.
Well, you know, to be fair, in typical objectivist fashion.
Obviously, that computes even less! After all, James Bond was basically a cartoon character. And Pussy Galore? Come on, the name itself!
No, in the meta-theater, objectivism is explored more by real life charactersâŚlike Turd and iambiguous.
In fact, a new production is already quite possibly in the works: ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop ⌠1&t=196131
Audition now, my friend, before the main parts are cast.
OK, so where did you get the idea of the gene / meme paradigm?
You dirty nazi?
OK, so where did you get the idea of the gene / meme paradigm?
Hint: Not from you.
Seriously though, I explained that on another thread:
I still recall the very first experience I had as a child with my âidentityâ as more than just me thinking this or doing that. I was at my Aunt Betty and Uncle Mikeâs house in Miners Mills, Pennsylvania. My family moved to Baltimore when I was 7, but every summer I would go back and spend a couple of months at my Grandmotherâs house. That day I had I had done something I was being reprimanded for but I refused to go into details as to why I had done it. Thatâs when my Aunt Mary said something to the effect, âitâs no use, he is just like his fatherâ.
And then for the first time, and for reasons I did not understand, I began to really think about that. âPhilosophicallyâ, as it were. I began to wonder how the boy I had become was connected to my parents and my family and how they had raised me and how in some ways I had come to be like them.
What if I had been raised by different parents in very different circumstances? Would I have done what I did that day? Would I have reacted to others as I did?
But then of course I slipped back into just being a kid again.
A kid. Not to be mistaken for a Kid.
Pedro I Rengel:OK, so where did you get the idea of the gene / meme paradigm?
Hint: Not from you.
I know. You got that from Dawkins.
I wonder how Dawkins would feel if he knew he was a hero of the nazi underworld?
iambiguous: Pedro I Rengel:OK, so where did you get the idea of the gene / meme paradigm?
Hint: Not from you.
I know. You got that from Dawkins.
Actually, Dawkins wasnât around back then in Miners Mills. Nor, for that matter, was James Bond. And the productions were of a whole different kind.
Back then, they revolved around the manner in which kids were all the more indoctrinated to view the world around them as others insisted it was. The new productions deconstruct that. They suggest a paradigm that folks like you are particularly averse to.
But: how about phoneutria? How averse to the new productions is she?
On the other hand, I donât have Becky around anymore to tell me.
Pedro I Rengel: iambiguous:[quote=âPedro I Rengelâ
OK, so where
did you get the idea of the gene / meme paradigm?
[/quoteHint: Not from you.
I know. You got that from Dawkins.
Actually, Dawkins wasnât around back then in Miners Mills.
Yeah but you werenât going on about genes and memes either. Because Dawkins came up with that.
Yeah but you werenât going on about genes and memes either. Because Dawkins came up with that.
As per usual, you miss the point entirely.
That part as an extra if you grew a pair? Forget it. Iâm giving it to one of the Stooges now. Larry I suspect.
You know, when he grows a pair.
These are the lengths you are willing to go to not to acknowledge where your objectivist theory comes from?
It comes from Dawkins, lad.