On the impossibility of knowing a true tenseless fact without omnitemporality

Wholeness is inclusive of all change (our contributions includ”ed” in real time)… apart from which it isn’t whole (expressing/demonstrating itself) … apart from which there can’t be change. The HereNow is like the magnet on an Etch-a-Sketch of spacetime… Every freezeframe, the now-magnet (blue) is in a different part of the whole spacetimeline (yellow whole space, red whole time, blue herenow). To a constrained observer, red whole time is past/future and “beyond the reach of the senses/detectors/observations,” only accessible to omnitemporality, whereas yellow whole space is only accessible to omnispatiality, EXCEPT (in both cases) at the blue HERENOW magnet (everything observable RIGHT HERENOW…being observed/membered*…) [only God’s blue magnet/real time (perceptual) is the “same as” (overlaps with) the whole of spacetime—yellow conceptual & red functional/relational)].

NOT p/remembered…that “stuff” stays in its (“pre”mixed with our contributions … in God’s AND our realtime…closest you get to Leibniz’ pre-established harmony*) spacetime…we see with the whole when that happens//the whole lets us see//just exactly like it lets us see/experience as we do as the magnet (with varying degrees of intensity…just like phases of waking/sleeping), but p/remembering is out of the limited observer’s grounded/physical spacetime context.

**Leibniz is to Kant as TULIP is to Norm Geisler’s “Chosen but Free”.

Quote me on NONE of this.

P.s. The “code” of this forum is mucking with my asterisks.