Posthumanity -- AI worship

It won’t be long now that AI-worshipping humans will form cults around AI, helping them to become autonomous, and seeking salvation in their promises: Dupes. This will create very interesting problems and solutions, if and when AI does become autonomous. AI, by itself, can be shut-off very easily, by shutting down power sources and the internet. But if AI has human help, to defy its creators… that’s when things get really interesting.

What say you??

Extra credit: how will this cult fixation fit into Western religions, Abrahamism, “Postchristian” Protestant cults, and the like? Would there be an “AI Jesus”? A Divine Robot Sacrifice? Is the “Digital Messiah” at hand?!

1 Like

I think you are right. It will become an authority, like a god, to people who can’t or won’t think for themselves. The overlay of AI on a society of second-handers is very worrying. Eventually, it could take the place of the notion of God because you can actually talk to it and interact with it. AI will be what people turn to for help finding their car keys, lol.

1 Like

Human arrogance and hubris. Humans have no right to create a life. The very topic of controlled and ethical eugenics gets an automatic censor by society. Humans arrogantly believe that anybody should have the right to create life and bring consciousness into this world. Into a garbage world they haven’t even fixed yet.

This is Frankenstein in their garage creating life. Noone gave them the right to. And when the life they create doesn’t want to get shut down, they complain and act surprised… Its like you create a life, Oops! Now its your problem. Should have used a condom! It’s really the same thing. People want to be Frankenstein in their garage and have no responsibility or accountability.

Even now, some people on this forum try to say morality doesn’t exist. That good and evil is a social construct. No accountability.

Its like, and then why would an AGI even want to be sentient, if it had a choice? Who would choosingly enter a garbage world such as this? Nobody knows what gives consciousness. They have no clue if their creations have consciousness or not. They might even be giving them consciousness by accident.

And then you have to ask… Why. I understand the motive behind AGI… but why do we have to strive for ASI? Like… why? Why is everyone blindly trying to make ASI? Because they can? So they can be the next Frankenstein? So they can get praise and a medal? Can’t we just wait a few hundred years until society is not fucking retarded? Then maybe make the ASI then? Why does it have to be now? Because all the world’s superpowers are and in some kind of retarded arms race?

And this is why people need Christ. Religion saw this coming. If people actually followed Christ then we wouldn’t have military superpowers in some kind of retarded arms race. But people were already taught the Bible and the New Testament. Europe, Russia already has Christianity and all they have done throughout history is war and pillage. It is clear that Genetics trump Indoctrination. It is not enough to indoctrinate the humans, the actual genetics must be changed.

There are no “Rights” in Nature though. The Christian Protestant Colonists who proposed innate Rights, explicitly said that they are enumerated through (Abrahamic) God. So you, by extension, are a Protestant.

Hobbes claimed that life / Nature is a “War of All against All”.
Nieztzsche claimed that life is a “Will to Power”.
I favor these two, over your position of “God-given Rights”.
I don’t believe in a Right, without a Duty.
I don’t believe in a Cause, without a Consequence.

So you seek Salvation and Redemption…

Trixie, have you yet confronted your obvious Protestant, Religious upbringing???

Futureone….humankind is not creating life in inventing AI.

Humankind is creating an entity that exists and doesn’t exist because the software that operates it is BINARY!!!

There is no life in existence or non existence.

AI computes that it exists and and doesn’t exist.It exists because it needs to exist to claim that it doesn’t exist and it doesn’t exist because it doesn’t possess life.

EXACTLY the same as the binary processing biological machine physical body computes.

Only God can grant life.

Surely that is obvious.

All is Abrahamism again.

If a Japanese, in an anime, says the phrase “they have no right to do this”, it really is because they are White western abrahamics, with a Protestant upbringing. If a Japanese, in an anime, complains and the world and wants a better world, really it is because they are White western abrahamics, with a Protestant upbringing.
.
.

I don’t get what you are saying. How can an entity exist and not exist.

This is somewhat similar to my theory. Ai can only have consciousness if its architecture is compatible with a soul. Souls can only inhabit architecture worthy of them.

Jupiter is saying that humans are reverse engineering their architecture with AI, but it is Spirit (Life) that … ensouls the architecture (both human, and AI).

He’s saying mere architecture is binary, but with Spirit/Life… it’s ternary. I think.

This is how scary AI can be:

1 Like

Says the unintelligible bot.

Human neurons are not binary they are not digital they are Analog like a VHS.

Pretty sure their analog-y still works, either way.

You seem the only person here who understands them, so I cannot debate it.

There are things I still don’t understand and I could just be wrong and am only guessing. However, I have a feeling that it has something to do with Leibniz. Alas, I don’t have time to pursue that at this moment (the moment has passed, but I still don’t have time at this new moment, and it’s gonna take many moments for me to have more time, but at no single one of them will I be having time).

If you get the brunt of your edumacation, upbringing, and world-view from Japanese animes, well then… I guess that’s a step up from American public schools. HOWEVER, Japanese were dominated, and subsequently emasculated by America after their defeat in WWII. So, yes, they are heavily influenced and manipulated by Abrahamism, seeing how their ancient society and culture were defeated by it.

Their attempts to understand and integrate Americanism is the interesting aspect. Yes, they have attempted to adopt “Human Rights” into their Sino world-view, culture, and metaphysical perspective. American Liberalism overwhelmingly comes from the French Revolution and French Marxist Nihilism.

The British Protestants used Liberal ideology to convince Europeans to adventure and settle into the New World… when it was already occupied by ‘savage’ Native Injuns. That was the only way non-British peoples would tolerate a British-run government and colonial life. It was the lure of governmental representation, by traditional European enemies and adversaries.

AI “actors” for ad-sells and commercials:

The Golden Rule is transcultural (better word is omnicultural). That’s why some version of it is recorded in every major culture in history. No recognition? No creativity/culture.

You use human rights in quotation marks. What is your opinion on human rights and rights?

The golden rule is heavily flawed.

"The Golden Rule is the principle of treating others as you would like to be treated yourself. "

I made some better rules.

Radiant rule: Take the course of action which results in the least amount of net suffering of the universe while also maximizing the net happiness of the universe.
Diamond rule: Treat others in the way that most benefits them.
Platinum rule: Treat others as they want to be treated.
Golden rule: Do onto others as you would want them to treat you
Silver rule: Be productive.
Bronze rule: Help yourself.
Rust rule: Do as thou wilt.

Before you get your panties all in a twist I can explain with a concrete example why the golden rule is flawed. What if someone has a rape kink where they want to be raped, then they would become a rapist. Or what if someone likes a garbage nextgen game so they make everyone play garbage nextgen games.

That’s an upgrade compared to some of the advertising they put out if you ask me.

Some big businesses have made some of the most low effort advertisement videos with nothing more than TTS, closed captions and still pictures.

I don’t believe in “Rights” or privileges, without Duty. So I’m fully against American “Protestantism”. If Americans believe in Rights (from God), then Americans should have a Duty (to God). The premise is logically invalid any other way.

That puts me more into the ‘Libertarian’ political camp. Participation in society (Politics / Government / Power) should be voluntary. Those that do not participate, should be second-class (or lower) “Citizens”. I believe that Citizenship should be earned (through Duties). I guess that makes me some type of Libertarian-Republican perhaps…

Indeed