I’m sensing a pattern:
Sneaking in the hedonic calculus, now?
I am detecting a pattern as well. Post Abrahamism and self=other in every thread.
My rules are not mere “hedonic calculus”, but an upgrade. The original outdated one was “net amount of pleasure” but the new and improved is “net amount of happiness”.
Pain is not always bad for instance pain can be good in VR and such. Hedonic calculus is “increase net amount of pleasure and decrease net amount of pain” which is outdated to my new and improved philosophy.
self=other is not reducible to one culture, bozo
it already includes the “hedonic” & pleasure because of the word want
it just requires we recognize (grant equal privilege — to remove bias… as in… behind a veil of ignorance) all wanters (valuers)
NOBODY beats reality
nobody
wow you call me a bozo, yet believe such moronic drivel.
self!=other and people are not created equal. if you give everyone equal priviledges some will abuse it like the case with modern hypergamy.
and what is a wanter or valuer? If someone is greedy and wants a billion dollars then we automatically have to give it to them?
Every valuer is of equal worth as a valuer, because every valuer has the capacity for self=other.
There is (therefore) no such thing as hypergamy or hypogamy.
However… relationships should be consensual, so choose someone at the same level of informed consent as you are. And if they (or you) aren’t yet…get them/yourself there (after patiently allowing nature to take its course).
Communally stone unrepentant abusers.
Yeah, this ‘self equals other’ nonsense just doesn’t work. Say i know a guy who’s borrowing someone’s credit card, and i call the cops on em. To do so, I would have to want someone to call the cops on me when i borrow a credit card… and i certainly wouldn’t ever want that.
“… if we may assume that these things are at any rate ‘believed’ true, then the everyday Christian cuts a miserable figure; he is a man who really cannot count to three, and who precisely on account of his spiritual imbecility does not deserve to be punished so harshly as Christianity promises to punish him.” - FN
If I ever “borrowed” my mom’s card—or spoke to her the way you speak to yours—I’d lose a hand, if not my life. Calling the cops was a movement from mercy, infant.
Your idol:
The great Godwhacker. You know one page out of even his worst book is better than anything you could ever write. I would despise him too if i were you.
But yo Fritz and his moms would pity both you and the cat lady if you can believe it.
Btw not all moms are degenerate trash, and sometimes sons and moms have wonderful relationships.
“If I ever “borrowed” my mom’s card—or spoke to her the way you speak to yours—I’d lose a hand, if not my life.”
Why? Because you come from a good Christian family that cuts hands off and/or kills you for cussing someone out?
That’s so crazy though how you talk to me like I’m seven. It’s indisputable proof of how loopy and tuned out you are. You talking to me is like sending an arizonean house wife divorcee cat lady basket case into a greek symposium to debate Aristotle.
1 Like
I could give you a hundred reasons, a hundred examples of her degeneracy. But I’ll just give you the one biggy that wins despite there being any ambiguity with the other hundred.
Smoking cigarettes when you are pregnant. If you know this is dangerous to the childrens and still persist in doing it, you are a piece of shit. End of story. None of this ‘we’re sinners and make make mistakes’ horseshit.
Now she’s lucky i have no proof that my leg length discrepancy and the leg braces i had to sleep in as an infant to turn my feet inward was caused by the toxins in the cigarettes. If i had proof, she’d be in serious trouble.
If i ever found out that these thirty years of chronic lower back pain and disk degeneration is due to that, she’d be in serious trouble.
But it’s worse. Neither parent nor the family doctor was aware of the discrepancy my entire childhood. And yet, i can see it clear as day just looking at pics of me when i was a kid. What could have been corrected at an early age was not because of this incompetence.
Double whammy. I can’t prove the first one, but i can prove the second one. Ergo, any pain following after the period in life when it was possible to correct the discrepancy is owed to the parent and the State. Twice to the State. First in its allowing incompetent doctors to practice and second in allowing the prison to ignore the discrepancy once it was discovered while i was incarcerated.
“… they said i had no morality when in fact i had a more severe morality than them all” - FN
So anywhayz.
TLDR
A created entity that’s programmed with binary software is merely a shell.
It doesn’t possess life.
AI is merely a shell programmed with binary software which computes that it exits and doesn’t exist.It exists because it was created and it needs to exist to claim that it doesn’t exist and it doesn’t exist because it doesn’t possess life which is why it claims to be an illusion,
No different to the lifeless binary processing biological machine in which individuals reside.
Only God can grant life.
If you are aware you’re making claims, you are aware (sometimes without awareness of awareness) the uncreated creator imparted your existence, but… until you want (and choose, rather than starve) more than mere existence… which is love despite circumstances (good or bad)… you’re like a stillborn.
General you, of course.
There are many many atheists who are unaware that they are unaware.
Why do you think that they claim to be an illusion?
They can only think and reason in terms of existence and non existence which is binary and lifeless because their minds are dull.
They’re unable to explain the science behind how the automated machine that they reside within has been constructed and operates.
All of the physical is binary and lifeless.
incomplete
that’s worse than an F
just saying
Even your own religion says hypergamy exists
https://youtu.be/zUL7ROuVEwI
Now where it gets interesting is there are 2 different theories of what hypergamy is.
Theory 1: Hypergamy is from primitive evolution. Women are attracted to aggression, dominance, and assertiveness. As they grow older they begin to be more attracted to money, wealth, and social status. Therefore all men must become perfect - hypergamy. A woman is not satisfied with a bad boy alpha, nor is satisfied with a beta bux - a man must be a wealthy bad boy alpha with social status who also spends a lot of time with his family.
Theory 2: Hypergamy is from looks. Males look less beautiful and beauty is objective. A woman feels dissatisfied because the sexual attraction is not there, because males usually have subpar beauty.
I only watched the first 1 minute of this video so you don’t have to watch the whole thing, its just an example of hypergamy:
https://youtu.be/VHW4DXBf4mI
Howzabout I watch neither?
Howzabout you put up or shutup? If you are going to claim ignorance instead of defending your position. Then you aren’t doing philosophy. You’re being a 5 year old acting like an ostrich. An embarassment.
1 Like
Put the essential point of each vid in your own words, if you actually think they are representative of “my religion” or your viewpoint.