As per the standard: âpredictive power and successâ (utility) is not an argument for philosophy.
The dangers of being blinded by the âsuccess of scienceâ (similar to having 
dollar signs in ones eyes) is evident in the âfundamental black box situationâ currently at play in the development of quantum computing.
A quantum computer, as commonly understood, is a spintronics device.
In spintronic devices, the alignment of the electron quantum spin values is used as a foundation that directly determines the outcome of computation.
The actual phenomenon underlying quantum spin is unknown and this means that an unexplained quantum phenomenon is not merely potentially influencing, but potentially fundamentally controlling the results of computations.
The quantum mechanical descriptions of quantum spin represent a fundamental black box situation. The quantum spin values used are âempirical retro-perspective snapshotsâ that, while deemed mathematically consistent, are fundamentally unable to explain the underlying phenomena. This creates a scenario where the prediction of computational outcomes is assumed while not being able to explain the underlying phenomenon of quantum spin.
The fact that quantum spin alignment lays at the root of 
crystal formation and potentially higher life (see topic From electron to bacteria and beyond - a case for real living AI) reveals the severity of the situation.
The danger of the dogmatic mathematical framing becomes evident in the idea of quantum errors or âunexpected anomaliesâ inherent to quantum computing that, according to mathematical science, âare to be detected and corrected in order to ensure reliable and predictable computationsâ
The idea that the concept âerrorâ is applicable to the phenomenon underlying quantum spin reveals the actual dogmatic thinking that underlays the development of quantum computing.