Pertaining to Jewish genius…
First thing to consider is that genetic isolation occurs for two reasons…geography/climate, and culture/religion.
Jewish custom has it that the Rabbi, the most educated and the most intelligent, because back then only the gifted got to go to school above a certain level, married the rich man’s daughter
Wealth coupled with smarts.
Social eugenics.
First factor.
Caucasian dominance is explained due to the harsh conditions they were forced to adapt to.
The conditions so harsh that the tribes that emigrated out of Africa, because they were weaker, almost went extinct.
Those who survived were the strongest and the brightest.
They passed on their genes.
The idiot, weakling perished.
With Jews the /holocaust acted as such a near extinction event…for the Ashkenazim Jews.
The fittest and the smartest, the most educated…survived…the average, weak, moron, died.
Not because the Nazis were exterminating them but because of the harshness of war time conditions in Europe.
Freud was taken out of Austria by his nephew Bernays…as an example.
Second factor.
The Jewish religion is very elitist…they are not only the ‘chosen ones’ but the rules that apply to Jews do not apply to the goy.
They have no scruples, no sense of fair-play, when it comes to other tribes.
Also their religion is nihilistic.
It overturned hierarchies and is distinctly anti-nature, anti-world.
Third factor
Intelligence can be warped by emotion.
Just because you have a high IQ does not mean that you can see clearly or think objectively.
Cowardice, emotional, self-interest, sex, and other psychological factors can warp genius and corrupt it, redirecting its focus.
There are neurosurgeons who believe in God and ghosts and in the afterlife.
A mind corrupted by emotion will focus its energies upon what deals with these stresses.
Fourth factor
The Jewish religion overturns hierarchies to where strength is weakness and weakens is strength.
To be chosen means to suffer on behalf of god and to expect an afterlife reward.
as a dogma it seduces the weak, the ill, the stupid, the feeble, the cowardly in every tribe. it is why Judaism became elitist to preserve the ‘;chosen’ distinction and why later Christianity became more universal, accepting all tribe into its bosom, to be saved.
the primary reason Jews were resented, early on, was because of this elitist choseness, that excluded salvation, from their monotheistic god, to other tribes.
It also explains why Jews have different rules of morality and conduct for Jews and for goyim.
Judaism is feminizing as it proposes an Alpha-male god, monopolizing power, and relegating all followers as beta-males.
It also promises retribution, venting resentiment among the masses.
These five factors in unison explain why Jews are smarter, on average, [Ashkenazim Jews, not the rest] and why they dominate modern socioeconomic and politics.
These factors manifest in a political, propaganda, dominated by Jews.
What is sold to the goy is not purchased by the Jew.
Multiculturalism, Liberalism, Marxism, Christianity, Feminism, gay rights, pop-culture, pornography, all conspire to reduce Indo-European male influence, diluting and corrupting the tribes other than Jews, in a divide and conquer strategy and the seduction of the weakest parts, women and children, to degrade the entire tribe.
The only threat to the Jew is the Indo-European male.
Allow me to put a one line counter forth.
If all that was true, why the most capable, intelligent, efficient, fittest and so called Chosen Ones are ruled by a Black African ruler since last many years?
Why they are not able to find a single chosen one amongst them?
Have the chosen ones lost their sheen?
With love,
Sanjay
The fact that you believe the President rules the elites in the U.S. exposes not only how naive you are, how taken over by the myth of Democracy, but you lack a basic understanding of human nature, and how power now hides, behind curtains, like the Wizard of Oz, to create a buffer between itself and the masses that always threatened it.
Might as well believe the halfwit George W was running the country.
Power uses proxies, sir.
It keeps their necks off the guillotine.
Marketing, psychological manipulation is a sophisticated method of allowing imbeciles to believe they vote with a clean picture of what is going on.
You think the fate of the richest nation on earth would be left in the hands of the most ignorant, dulelst, stupidest, numb, people in the history of mankind?
Time to come out of the rabbit hole little girl.
What a crappy posting system ILP has.
Why is it crappy? Could not sleep did some reading ,re read some parts of Sartre’s Antisemite and Jew, and it’s a lot of apologies for guilt sustained after the inglorious conclusion of WW2, however there is some relevance there attributable to the Dreyfus affair,man’s seeing that as a pattern.
basically,Sartre sees anti semitism as a cover. he makes comments such as ,‘The Dreyfus affair forced the doors of the aristocracy’
And, ‘Equality for mobs is the product of non differentiations of functions - where social bond collectivity has no other goal then excercise over certain individuals a diffuse repressive sanction.’
He claims that anti semitism is the result to impose order by groups of people, with basic insecurities, and that it is (anti semitism) always in a latent condition, waiting for an opportune moment , when the republic is at its weakest’
makes sense to me.
What about Sartre’s basic held beliefs? The formulation of Being and Nothingness was influenced by Heideggers Being and Time, so the general basics are perpetuated, of the Dasain, as a predecessor. It is such a simple formula yet so few understand it. Heidegger, along with Nietzche misunderstood and used by the uneducated to further their agenda. It is through fear and insecurity that the imposition of order as a repressive tool imposed, in correlation to the imposition of a redeeming love which seems to some as an act of disposition, a trans valuation, of values. Love being a social bond, whose definition being illusion and mystical , has to be imposed,so as to disenfranchise the abstract values of objective criteria, such as the attainment of power through control. Love and social bonding is ok, except, it has to be regulated, otherwise the results are nihilistic.
So what is going on here? Is there a cure?
Sartre’s early fascination with objective social bonding, got a shock, when the Hungarian Revolution, showed that even substitute tough love, can have a hidden bite, and love it’s nemesis the Nothingness , can have an objective albeit divided effect. So what is the meaning in the veritable consequence of all this? The film, the splicing together of the fabric of Being, that no normal seamstress is capable of, of a fabric, of inconsistency, made up originally out of a ressentiment of opportunity, a fabric of a collage, made to look like a
tapestry a veritable bazaar of lost artifacts. Of course he got disillusioned, and the result? The void into which faith in social systems have fallen into nothingness, the fear of which having been converted
Into a positive motivator, causing hyper vigilance, looking for signs where the objective can again be re affirmed in positive ways, different then the displaced function of of a failed, identified equality. The French are weak, because the revolution started there, liberty et equality was the starting point, and then of course not there but the good old USA,ms tarted it,all with their war for independence. The aristocracy was not the result of some French man declaring Racine to be only fit by the French,mot was good,old Benjaminn Franklin, living innFrance, who transposed these fearless ideas, and made it happen.
Dreyfus was such a man to be an example of, so as to open the channels of public awareness of what has always been a particular political dynamic to alert systemic weakness.
Sartre was a communist, who copied Heidegger and had very little original content of his own.
He bored me when I read his Being and Nothingness, and I hadn’t even read Being and Time.
You are still on Sartre?
Berlin was decadent before the war.
Porn industry was controlled then and now by who?
Why did the Jews control the banking system?
What happened during World War 1 and why?
Did the Jews declare war on Hitler’s Germany first?
Was 6 million already the number being used?
Why after it has been discovered than not more than 1 million Jews died in the camps has the number remained 6?
Why are simpletons repeating the number without knowing?
Did more Jews die or more communists, more Russians?
Was the extermination of the Native Americans by the Christians more of a holocaust?
Then why no movies about it?
Why are the Jews the prime victims in Modern pop-culture?
Who controlled the slave trade?
Did they die because of a directed mass extermination program or due to starvation and disease, which is why civilians die in all wars?
I am on Sartre on and off, to get another view by someone who lived and worked and fought during that era.
Incidentally, his ontological interpretation is interesting, and brings to mind on the various identities we can bring up in relation to non differentiation of function.
In thought of You, in relation to me in this respect, and I too had personal difficulties all through my life, and tried to differentiate it from the gross historical movements, which after a while, had to be disassociated from a personal view. In have to do this for reasons of retaining sanity. Sartre is impersonal in Being and Nothingness, but very personal in the very first philosophical novel I have ever read , ‘Nausea’. it was so overwhelming and relevant to me at the time, that I will re read, as soon as i can, if not for it’s philosophical significance, but for it’s painting an atmosphere, which can be re created as soon as the pages are turned. I gotto get some sleep, in two hours going tomorrow. Have a good day, man.
Aidon, I do not know but your tone and language is reminding of Satyr.
With love,
Sanjay
Satyr wrote:
Aboriginal Australians are descendents of the first people to leave Africa up to 75,000 years ago, a genetic study has found, confirming they may have the oldest continuous culture on the planet.
Professor Eske Willerslev of the University of Copenhagen, who led the study, says Aboriginal Australians were the first modern humans to traverse unknown territory in Asia and Australia.
“It was a truly amazing journey that must have demanded exceptional survival skills and bravery,” he says.
They are not the ‘chosen ones’.
The Jews had rejected the message and were no longer God’s people - just as Daniel had predicted. Henceforth they could be saved only as individuals, in exactly the same way as the Gentiles. As a nation, they had been rejected as the chosen people.
Read the scriptures.
The healthy use of emotion is related to effective use of all the mental functions rather than being uniquely associated with feeling. It seems clear EI is not feeling and that it is not antagonistic to thinking judgment.
“The Egyptian, Babylonian, and the Persian rose, filled the planet with sound and splendor, then faded to dream-stuff and passed away. The Greek and Roman followed, made a vast noise and they are gone. Other peoples have sprung up, and held their torch high for a time, but it burned out and they sit in twilight now or have vanished. The Jew saw them all, beat them all, and is now what he always was, exhibiting no decadence, no infirmities of age, no weakening of his parts, no slowing of his energies, no dulling of his alert and aggressive mind. All things are mortal, but the Jew. All other forces pass, but he remains. What is the secret of his immortality?” Mark Twain
That the Jewish nation, such a tiny group of people, survived two thousand years of exile and persecution was nothing short of a supernatural phenomenon.
Biblical prophecy.
Judaism will not disappear any time soon, being integral to capitalism.
Aidon: “Intelligence [size=150]can[/size] be warped by emotion.”
=D>
Punished for a thousand years for its betrayal of one of its own, it was held together merely by its prideful racism against all others. And released after the first millennium to reek havoc throughout Europe via disguise/obfuscation and extortion (via the Khazars).
And you might want to rethink your presumption that the Askenazi are the “smartest people on the planet”. Realize that they supply you with your news and views. Although their war against intelligence did wipe out a great deal of non-Judist intellect (including Jewish).
They were hated for a reason, far beyond their extreme racism, but you are not allowed to speak of why.
On the Benefits of a Thick Skull
It’s easy to mistake obtuseness for strength and sensitivity for weakness.
The crass appear to be admirably coping when they are simply oblivious to what is occurring.
Stupidity is a natural immunity to life’s miseries, and a thick skull the best protection against man’s vulgarity.
The only way that proposition would make sense what’s so ever, is, if all of a sudden, one would be able to become a true objectionist,meaning one would conceivably get to know themselves, within a modicum of precision. Absent that, I see no way, as generally the saying goes, it takes one to know one.
Some of us, sadly, have been misguided as to our lineages, and that has caused some problems in the perception of true knowledge.
Intelligence that can only nihilistically produce immunity by clinging-to-self is not Intelligence per se in the manner of free-spirited freedom.
Very, very briefly, I agree that de territorialization, causes a shift in focusing within larger perimeters of expression of the ideal, this is why the prescription seems to be a de imagination. < the info using of the Imago> per new psychology. This seems the only formula against a sustained pessimism,mover and above the shortcuts, which seek to diffuse the ideal, by overcoming the abyss between clear definitions of the difference between a good(ideal) representation, and a bad (abstract) representation. The distinction made where the abstract expression was made to differ from the impression of the ideal object.
If art would reintegrate this shorccut from the beginnings of this split, all the way to and through the denial of it, -I almost said suppression- but that would entail bad form on my part, , then and only then would a natural and formal progression be reastablished between knowledge and experience. If there is a problem there is always a solution, albeit only a temporary one. Repetitive practice of new forms, can de territorialization even the most hardened narrative. We are human after all only human. Such narratives can re focus on a changed model, appropriate to a universal appreciation.
J SS wrote:
Let me do it for you.
…what a load.
Just a very small example of those being left out (a favorite trick of news and money makers);
Those who made the most money are not the ones who invented things, but rather those who fleeced the masses with the inventions of others. If your intent was to show that the Judists are the most inventively parasitic users of people to their own wealth, you might be right. But they have NOT been the most intelligent (I know intelligence when I see it).
Additionally, Isaac Newton was sued by Robert Hooke for stealing the inverse square law for gravity. Hooke didn’t win the suit but only because Newton managed to get the law measured and published first. In court, he admitted that it wasn’t his idea. Then as it turned out, the “Newtonian forces” all turned out to be incorrect. Einstein came along, not believing in forces, and provided a mind twisting concept involving the bending of spacetime, Relativity. He could never get it completely working and turns out to be wrong as well, although today worshiped as holy gospel in the West.
Newtonian forces were superstition. Einstein’s bending of space, Relativity, is current superstition. Yet in the West, those are the names you hear as the greatest geniuses. I can see the intelligence from which their wealth is procured and it isn’t from them. Even Moses got his Staff concept from the Pharaoh.
JSS wrote
LOL…I think I agree with you on that one.
Some people cannot understand how specialization works…how focusing an IQ of 100 may produce remarkable things when an IQ of 180 is focused in different areas…sort of mental Kung Fu…concentration.
I’ve called it institutionalized autism. It is the psychological phenomenon of nerdiness, as some would understand it: to be a genius in one area and a retard in every single other area.
The aid of communal genius, precedent, is another factor…
It requires no more than an average mind to become a repeater of recipes, and to memorize precedent to guide your professional career.
This is why women are outnumbering males in Universities.
no creativity required, no thinking outside the box…all the schools do is train average minds to function within certain jobs.
An average mind suffices.
A feminine mind is perfect because it submits to authority, never goes off outside the lines, relies heavily on recipes, references, support, precedent.
Being a professor of philosophy in an Ivy League university does not make you a philosopher of any worth.
Teaching art history, being an art critic, knowing art, does not make you an artist.
Some minds obsessed with the moralities and mythologies of their Modern times, only repeat the shared beliefs…mainly because they make them feel good, safe.
They cannot explain how species evolve, splintering off from a common ancestor, how intelligence evolves, since in their bullshit universe it is evenly distributed, and why appearances matter all the time except when it comes to humans.
How terribly unfair, cruel, nature must seem to such depraved, cowardly, feminine minds.
For such stunted spirits, to say anything negative about what you depend upon is hateful.
It implies violence.
This si how brainwashed they are and how much they do not belong in anything using the term “philosophy” to describe it.
What they want is a social gathering to hug, and share quirky facts about themselves, make some friends, display how well-groomed they are, flatter themselves, and be invigorated by the social contact.
They do not give a shit about reality, the world…they care about their happiness, their pleasures, how they can protect themselves within a world they cannot bear to look at directly and honestly.
Sad that what appears, is apparent, is not accidental, nor insignificant, nor shallow, nor an illusion.
Sad that intelligence is not distributed evenly across populations, no more than any other trait’s potential is.
It’s sad that the past, nature, determines our inherited potentials in all areas, and not only in the “physical”.
It’s so, so sad…