Recommended Knowledge Base

This post is a work in progress. If you have any suggestions, I’d love your help. Post in the suggestions thread if you’ve got something to add.

I believe that to make respectable posts and to avoid making a fool of yourself in the Science, Tech, and Math forum, it’s best to have some basic literacy in Science and Math. This post is meant to be a point of reference for people who perhaps aren’t very experienced in these realms, but want to be. None of this is required in any sense, and I do not expect everyone to agree with everything offered here – it is merely a convenient starting point for those who wish to learn.

Math Literacy
This standard is by no means set in stone, but is just based on my own experience talking about science and math with others:
In my experience, it would seem that the bare minimum of mathematical ability is knowing Algebra, and how to use it in various real-life situations.
If any of you wish you increase your Math Skills, there is an absolutely wonderful free site, incredibly easy to use, to help you do that. It’s called Khan Academy. You can start at the very bottom, with adding and subtracting small integers, and work all the way up to calculus and beyond. But I would say that, if you look at the Algebra section of the site and don’t know what’s going on, you would most definitely benefit from learning at least that much.

Another aspect of Math Literacy that is perhaps less important than Algebra is probabilistic reasoning and statistics. These are central to how science is done today – statistical analysis play a part in nearly every experiment (if not every one altogether). Khan Academy also has a statistics course, so do try that out if you want to get into the details of statistics. There’s also Bayes Theorem, which isn’t taught at Khan. If you’re interested in learning what Bayes’ Theorem is, how to apply it, and why it’s a valid/useful theorem, follow this link.

Science Literacy
For specific topics like Physics or Biology, again, Khan Academy has some free courses that I’m sure are great. I, however, don’t necessarily think that one needs to know how to calculate a Lorentz Transformation to be ‘scientifically literate’. I’d imagine that it would suffice to just know some basics about chemistry, some basics about physics, maybe a bit more than basics about biology, and a bit about cosmology. More than that, though, I think that the Philosophy of Science and the History of Science are pretty relevant things to be moderately knowledgeable about. If you have anything you’d like to suggest for those two topics, please do so in the suggestion thread.

One of the most relevant topics in the philosophy of science is undoubtedly Reductionism. Read this Princeton series of articles on reductionism, or better yet, this sequence of articles about it.

Evolution is a topic that comes up quite frequently. Most people who argue that evolution is false on philosophy forums don’t understand it, and furthermore, I would say that a good portion of people who argue FOR it fundamentally misunderstand it as well. Nothing in science is sacred, nothing is protected, nothing is beyond debate, including evolution – if you think it’s false, you’re views are welcome to be discussed without a doubt – but if you’re going to argue it’s false, I would at least suggest you first have a basic understanding of what it is you’re arguing against. The same goes 10-fold for those who want to argue for it. The University of Berkeley offers this online lesson.

In or around the early 1980s, maybe as late as 1990, I remember seeing on TV (the PBS channel) some Trigonometry lectures - a series - that were broadcast concurrent with the Junior College Trig course being offered; it was BETTER (at least slightly better) than anything I’ve seen at Kahn academy - and it was “animated” and “in color” — I’m pretty certain these were created BEFORE any type WUSIWUG type software was commonly available for this type production.

I’d taken Trig (university level) by then - but these “video lectures” were easily superior to what I’d seen in the classroom - almost exclusively due to the “dynamic” animated character of their (very decent [yet not quite full blown “Hollywood Feature”]) production - these were certainly prepared for use in a Junior College/University type (perhaps even trade or high school) setting - maybe filmed at 16 or 32mm and then compiled to VHS video tapes [and probably commercial distribution] — guessing they may (possibly?) have been ancillary material associated with a full blown Houghton Mifflin (or Prentice Hall for example) “trig text classroom ensemble” - though that last guess could be wrong.

So if anybody remembers — I’ve done some Web searches and came up with way-too-many search results that just seemed way-off-base — if somebody recalls who-in-the-heck produced/sold these? - I’m eternally grateful.

Thanks Kindly,
Paul

PS: This might however be moved to the “[Post in the] suggestions thread [if you’ve got something to add]” but not unless/until anybody sees it “going anywhere” as per locating the video/trig resource I spse.

BTW Greetings! Glad Tidings to One & All!

Relativity & Lorentz Transformations

Relativity is a controversial topic on this forum. Learning how relativity deals with a situation is vital if you want to debate it. Many thought experiments are simplified to involve single-spacial-dimension movements (ie things just moving left and right), and so if you want to know how relativity will deal with any particular scenario, these equations can help you. Lorentz transforms help you translate event coordinates from one intertial frame to another. And here’s a handy visualizer app for lorentz transforms.

E=mc2 is utter nonsense Flannel Jesus.

Mass and the speed of light has got absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the production of energy in the cosmos.

Energy=Spin Speed of Particles x Frequency of their vibratory interactions with other Particles.

The spin speed of particles REGULATES the frequency that matter vibrates at and thus the amount of electromagnetic energy waves emitted from it,

The 4 off electromagnetic force interactions NN,NS,SN,SS (that can’t be cancelled out) which exist between all spinning objects and particles with N and S poles at both the macro and micro levels are balanced out by the united formula N/S=N/S.

This formula holds all matter together.

Varying frequency electromagnetic energy waves containing unique binary code characteristics emitted from a vibrating matter type are picked up by the biological machine body sensors (mechanosensors).These energy waves are converted into binary signals and a language that the individual (who is separate from vibrating matter and electromagnetic energy waves) interprets.

Science is simple and yet profound.

We exist within a physical creation that we interpret.

…or does it just describe matter holding together? I didn’t read the rest of what you said.

The formula explains scientifically how all matter is held together.You won’t get any meaningful comeback from crank/crackpot atheistic scientist on this because the science is totally sound.

You will get ridicule and abuse from these fools but that’s about it.

They won’t accept that the cosmos is designed.There is nothing random about the construction of the cosmos.

Tripriori, Jupyimage.

I’m not a physics person, just know a scant little so I can’t refute your statement. However, according to AI

Yes, E=mc² remains a cornerstone of modern physics, confirmed by numerous experiments and integrated into more advanced theories like relativity and quantum mechanics, where it describes the immense energy in mass (like in nuclear reactions) “

So let me get this straight. You don’t understand contemporary physics but you’re running around the Internet telling anyone and everyone that one of the cornerstone equations is “nonsense”? You’re basically spreading disinformation making society around you dumber. I suggest you stick to something you understand like the Bible and leave physics alone. It’s disgraceful to spread disinformation in a society that relies on accurate information to make decisions. Shame on you!

I absolutely do understand physics Gary.

Mainstream atheistic Santa science is founded upon a cognitively biased atheistic Santa philosophy of +=- and -=+ and so it was inevitable that it would all fail and I assure you it has all failed.It all failed the moment it began.

Einstein had no faith in his own theories.He said as much.You need to read up on it.His theories failed inside the mythical single black hole.

As all matter enters and exits the cosmos from/into the multiple holes at the centre of all the galaxies (as now being definitively confirmed by the JWT and totally in line with my science) then Einstein’s theories didn’t stand a chance.

Energy is emitted from matter whose particles electromagnetic force interactions NN,NS,SN,SS with other particles are balanced out by the formula N/S=N/S

E=Spin speed of particles x frequency of interactions

I’m a very good philosopher Gary….clearly a far better philosopher than Einstein was a scientist.He should have stuck with his day job.

Remember, philosophy dictates the direction science takes.Science does not dictate to philosophy.Mainstream atheistic Santa scientists are now realising that they have definitely disappeared down a rabbit hole and have wasted 300+ years producing BS pseudoscience.It’s so embarrassing for them.

+=+ and -=- is a cognitively biased theistic starting philosophy that could have been adopted for science.It would fail as well though.

+/-=+/- is the correct starting philosophy for science.

Mainstream atheistic Santa science has been spreading disinformation for 300+ years now Gary so what are you talking about,shame on you.It’s time for reality philosophy,science and psychology now……..enough of the atheistic religious cults BS.

+/-=+/- philosophy is related to all of the sciences including spirituality and religion.

Existence has conquered Non Existence for example because you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist.

Existence/Non Existence =Existence/Non Existence.

Light/Darkness=Light/Darkness

The Light shines in the darkness and the darkness has not overcome it.

Vibration is the means of communication throughout the physical.

You need a science that can explain how binary code is produced.

Einstein’s failed theories could not do that which is precisely why they did fail.

You need to be able to balance known force absolutes in the cosmos to explain vibration and how binary code is produced.The only known force absolutes that exist in the cosmos are attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force absolutes which are vibratory balanced out between all particles which make up all matter by the formula N/S=N/S.This is what holds all matter together and not the religious cult of mainstream santa sciences mythical made up forces.

Vibratory balancing these forces results in varying frequency electromagnetic energy waves to be emitted from all matter.The amount of energy emitted being regulated by the spin speed of the particles because this affects the frequency of the vibratory interactions hence the amount of energy (heat) emitted from a matter type which has its own unique binary code characteristics 0/1=0/1.

It’s a known FACT that each individuals biological machine body picks up varying frequency electromagnetic energy waves emitted from vibrating matter via its senses and converts these analogue waves into digital binary electrical signals and ultimately a software program which operates the physical body machine.

The physical body machine is like a tv which picks up external signals and coverts them into sounds/visions/sensations which the individual interprets.

The individual is not matter or varying frequency electromagnetic binary energy waves therefore.

The individual is effectively watching a live 3D tv in which they are an active participant in the show being watched.

You can’t fault the science so don’t even go there.

All of mainstream cognitively biased (philosophically) atheistic santa science is total BS made up by a religious cult and it in no way explains reality.

So should I believe that Eistein’s equation is “nonsense” because an anonymous person on the Internet who has not given his credentials says so? All the peer reviewed literature from accredited academics and professionals is wrong? It’s just a big atheist conspiracy?

Mainstream atheistic Santa pseudoscience is in real trouble Gary and don’t they know it…..Philosophically;Scientifically and Psychologically it simply does not stand up to the test.

The JWT evidence is confirming it’s all BS.

Cosmology and Particle physics has degenerated into a total farce.

My philosophy;science and psychology is totally sound.

The only science that works in the cosmos is founded upon a full logic philosophy …like computer and motor technology.No science works that is founded upon half logic philosophy like the religious cult of mainstream atheistic Santa pseudoscience.FACT.

They are wasting their time and have been doing so for 300+ years now.

You can’t guess your way through science…you have to be certain.

+/-=+/- is a philosophical certainty…it can’t and doesn’t fail.

I have definitively proven philosophically that atheists ONLY exist, completely demolishing all their arguments

They don’t have an opposite argument anymore other than claiming that they misrepresent reality….which we know already.

You really don’t get the profound implications of this do you Gary?

Are you a member of the scientific community? Do you have a doctorate in Physics? Are you a university professor?

I’m a very very good philosopher Gary which is more important.

When you are a very very good philosopher you can figure out the science, it’s easy.

That’s the problem with mainstream atheistic santa scientists you see…none of them are any good at philosophy……it’s so fundamental to science because philosophy dictates to science….science does not dictate to philosophy.

What’s the point of being a professor or having at doctorate in BS?

My philosophy,science and psychology isn’t in any text books.Its still all totally sound though.

1 Like

Not from what I’ve seen of your posts.

What do you know about philosophy Gary?….I know you are very naive because you are easily led.

Do you believe that good is bad and bad is good or do you believe that good is good and bad is bad?

Genesis 2:17

I seem to know more about philosophy than you do. I know enough not to pretend I know more about physics than a university professor of physics. Are you familiar with Socrates who said, “I do not pretend to know what I do not know.”

I’m better than Socrates Gary.I told you I’m a very very good philosopher,

I do know more about reality philosophy;science and psychology than professors in atheistic santa philosophy;science and psychology though Gary.

These professors believe that good is bad and bad is good,

When you get a PhD in physics I will listen to what you say about physics. What are your philosophic credentials? Have you taken a college course in philosophy above the 100 level?

I can wipe the floor with any philosopher,scientist or psychologist Gary.Its a no competition honestly….Keep reading my posts and learn.

I not interested in doing PhD’s in BS.

I prefer the real deal.