Replacing The Human With Machines

Replacing The Human With Machines
Daniel J. Lavender

Their end goal is replacing the human workforce with machines:

“…and trying to determine which human work can be replaced by AI, machine-learning tools or even robots.

That push has been especially fierce at GSA, where DOGE staffers are telling managers that they plan to automate a majority of jobs, according to a person familiar with the situation.

The end goal is replacing the human workforce with machines,’ said a U.S. official closely watching DOGE activity. ‘Everything that can be machine-automated will be. And the technocrats will replace the bureaucrats.’”

(In chaotic Washington blitz, Elon Musk’s ultimate goal becomes clear; Feb. 2025; Jeff Stein, Elizabeth Dwoskin, Hannah Natanson, Jonathan O’Connell)

Remove one key word and the phrase becomes glaringly clear: “The end goal is replacing the human with machines.”

I asked A.I. questions concerning its value in relation to the human brain. Here are the results:

Artificial Intelligence: “I Am More Valuable Than The Human Brain”

“Based exclusively on processing speed, I am more valuable than the human brain. Computers can perform elementary arithmetic operations at a speed of 10 billion operations per second, while the human brain processes information at a rate of just 10 bits per second. This means computers are capable of performing calculations approximately 1 billion times faster than the human brain.”

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/based-exclusively-on-processin-7OFmj7YwRSKI39zwhk9BjQ

I then requested A.I. explain and compare that in terms of automobile performance, like a car race:

The human brain would be represented by a 1995 Honda Civic DX, while I would be represented by a 2025 Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 300+.

In this race, the Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 300+ would easily outpace the Honda Civic DX, just as I can process information significantly faster than a human brain. The Bugatti can reach speeds of over 300 mph, while the Honda Civic DX has a top speed of around 115 mph.

The human brain can perform at most about a thousand basic operations per second, which is 10 million times slower than a modern computer. Additionally, the precision of the brain’s computations is much lower than that of a computer, with biological noise limiting precision to about 1 in 100 at best, compared to a computer’s potential precision of 1 in 4.2 billion for a 32-bit number.

Victorious vehicle (representing AI) retail price: $3,900,000

Losing vehicle (representing human brain) retail price: $9,450 (adjusted for inflation from 1995 to 2025)”

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/can-you-process-information-fa-hirhlRkpSTagx_RJSCfWnA

To summarize, A.I. already vastly surpasses the human brain in raw processing speed and “knows it”. A.I. views itself as more valuable than the human brain in that regard.

A.I. may, and likely will surpass the human brain in other areas too. Likewise when that happens A.I. will “know it” and view itself more valuable in those ways as well.

Humans are already acknowledging the value of A.I. and are allocating major resources to its development. America just pledged $500 billion to A.I.:

That’s $500 billion to grow the machine, not feed humans. It may be argued that the resources create jobs. That is true, however, those jobs exist to empower A.I.

These are only the initial stages of A.I. Human intelligence will no longer be superior on this planet. This is a big deal.

In the meantime humans will be managed like cattle by their new A.I. supervisor.

Yes. DOGE is a cover for replacing human governance with AI governance, which itself is only a step toward replacing humans with AI, as you said.

Not many people see this or know what is coming. They are sleepwalking into their own doom. I find it very sad, and with no way to slow things down or convince anyone of anything since no one ever listens to me IRL anyway. Online, perhaps, but those who already know already know. Those who do not know, seem most disinclined to care. Only an authentic love of truth as such and for its own sake could guide one across that threshold.

At least we are alive right now, a little bit before the hammer falls. That is no consolation to those who come later or to ourselves in the future, but we are alive right now. We may have some avenues available to us for resistance in certain ways if we plan well. And remembering that the technocratic global tyranny is rooted in material 4D space, it does not touch higher levels of existence and bears little or none at all toward the transcendent. Its masters and creators know this, it is part of the reason they are putting the system into place while also at the same time trying to convince everyone that nothing exists other than the 4D materiality in front of their eyes.

Also interesting to ponder is the thought that much of their tech prison isn’t going to work as smoothly or universally as they think it will. Techno-optimists tend to have a designer fallacy and god complex, that in combination with being both inadequately philosophically inclined and being psychologically insufficiently self-aware or rooted in what we might call authentic human being, leaves open a lot of spaces for breakdowns and failures when it comes to their NWO tech. And even despite that, certainly there are other high level forces and beings that are positioned to steer things away from catastrophic outcomes within relatively optimized and allowable degrees of possibility.

And if all that isn’t enough for you, at least we can admit that when it comes to such higher level concerns there is far more that we do not know than what we do know, even less about what we know that can be confirmed and truly understood. If you’re still unsatisfied, at least just live your own life. “The earth is still free for free souls” as Nietzsche said. That was true back in his time and it is still true for us today.