I may have used different words, but yeah, two dozen of one. It has an end. Time, this, that, splitting hairs, adding a stone just so he can hop over it.
Time in general is more a posteriori than people grant. In retrospect.
The one who is omnitemporally present would agree in spect, retro or pro got nuthin ta do with it.
C’mon man. Agreeing on everything is b-b-b-boring. Fake fight like a man.
I got tired of all the repostes being “no you’re ugly!”
Man has a way to go before I fight him again
Lol man.
Lead with something beautiful, ugly ass ho.
lol jk
No why the jk, that was actually beautiful.
Unlike you, I’m not ok with rapid cycling in & out of dick mode w/o letting folks know I just think they’re funny (haha).
I totally disagree with all of this shit that’s being said here.
Thinking of high quality is requested, please. You are capable.
Nobody likes my thinkings. It annoys them and makes them suspicious.
You could say that ceremony is Aristotle’s form, but that would be an inversion of hierarchy.
maybe don’t act so sus
get out of my thread or say something relevant
The best thing to take your mind off a Paulita (right after marrying her, and all the married people laugh and laugh and laugh, and then just sort of mumble into their coffee) is to universalize your own stupidity and mock it as if it wasn’t yours. That’s what this thread is about. Get with the program.
I did a reverse Foucault, or I reached Foucault’s end and was smart enough to keep going into the u turn. The individual is a collage, and I don’t personally identify so much as represent.
I cannot universalize my own stupidity, because it is not “mine” anyway, and also there is no universe.
…is that your true position/orientation to/in reality?
I’m going to marry her. I feel smart today because I realized that. But then the pain of the current position hit.
Sorry for this extemporaneous quip. You brought her up.
It’s a glancing reflection of it.
It has built over decades like the alien in Life, in patterns and ways that can be called cumulative but have no equivalent in normalcy.
But actually it’s clean and cold and coherent, but not communicable by reason of having no reference: it is too individual of a way there, too fortuitous of a set.
Nietzsche knew how to speak past the reflection of the pond, but I don’t.
…and can you relate this back to the original post? In the language of it, I mean.
Well I mean you take ought for granted. You seem to have no space for questioning ought, only for determining its correct manifestation. So I have no way in.
Neighbourman said, when I buoyantly told him I had a date, without skipping a beat, “don’t get married.”
Later when I told him about the double take, he said “well I once refused to take no, the third time I got a yes, and I married her. Then we got divorced.” He looked at me, pondering whether to bullshit me. “It was worth it.”
I think he understood the situation.