I’m neither gay nor a pedophile. I just spit on the God on whom you go down–with my cock.
Hey guys, nothing wrong with being a Roma. I’m not gonna tolerate anyone targeting Magnus and his ethnic background.
Magnus, you don’t have to be ashamed anymore, you can embrace your heritage with pride. We all come from somewhere.
Quit jacking off to Joker in defiance of the Christian God, it doesn’t make sense, and just confuses the fuck out of the both of them, trying to figure out who your making this erotically defiant display about. It is bad enough Joker is hacking a presidential election as a “Anarchist”, but now he has to take Baby Jesus’ side as say your creeping them both out, and please stop jerking to them.
Your forcing him to take common cause with Christ. Joker- know this doesn’t qualify as a baptism.
I am aristocratic white. Not my term. That’s how people describe my whiteness. I am the whitest of the white. Few whites can compete with me.
I am also blonde, though my hair got darker with time. I am light brown/dark blonde right now.
I am also tall, if that’s of interest to you, and I was always among the tallest in school. I am a Montenegrin by origin and Montenegrins are the tallest people in the world (right there with Dutch people.)
My father’s nickname is “White” because he is (or rather was) just too white.
There is simply no point in mocking my physical appearance nor ethnicity in general.
I am also coming from a family of aesthetically sensible people. Many were artists. I too have artistic inclinations. Which is why I was expected to go to art school. (But I didn’t because I was also good at maths, programming, etc.)
Your fantasies are futile.
I’m whiter than you, tall, and don’t have a family history of being bitches to the Ottomans. I can count actual Aristocrats and Crusaders in my family tree. Not impressed.
Honestly, whiter, this Vitigilo… My body produced antibodies that attack my own skin tone. I’ve figured out how to reverse it, but ummm… skin color isn’t a sign of royalty. It is a sign you inherited some white steppe genes, and most carriers are of peasant descent. The ancestry of even kings is mostly peasants.
Vitiligo? Michael Jackson suffered from vitiligo. I suppose he’s whiter than me too.
You went too far with Buddhism. You can no longer tolerate aggressive instincts. Everything aggressive necessarily means pissed off (i.e. frustrated) to you.
Aggression is not the same as frustration. Only those who cannot be aggressive (which means they would frustrate themselves if they tried to be aggressive) can possibly think that the two are equal.
We are in agreement that you are a retard because you really are a retard. It is truth perceived by several different people.
Because it is true.
It is not in my head, it is outside of my head. You really are a retard.
If you want to see it for yourself, all you have to do is to face your painful instincts you’ve been repressing for so long. The answer is right in front of your nose. Just look at it.
It isn’t. It’s truth.
Your break will come at the point of death the same as for everyone else
In the meantime try and find some meaning in your life to make it worth living
Color is determined by copper content per skin cell. Darker people have five copper atoms, white people generally 3, albinos 0.
That’s nothing to be impressed about. Add to this, even the most backwards of backwards tribes we made first contact with had a social hierarchy, it shows literally fucking everyone has Aristocrats, but also has a whole lot more bitches, and after enough time passes, everyone in a gene pool has a common ancestor.
If your of white descent, even just one in your family tree (say your Obama), then everyone is related to one another from European Descent as of 1400AD.
So if you find a Aristocrat or King, or bitch slave or water boy from prior to 1400 with descendants today, be you Scandinavian or a Asian Minor Greek, British or Russian, extremely high chance your related to then, and this applies even to current ruling monarchs.
Going farther back, most people likely could claim descent from Muhammad in Europe, given all the Islamic invasions and crusades over the years.
I am so not fucking impressed with supposed aristocratic heritage, especially co sideraing the Hapsburg Jaw or the Ptolomaic Ugly Fatness hereditary traits, or the dwarfism. Sometimes you just need a few gene injection, or you come looking like a cum rag, or Sauwelios (Jack off into a brown rag and tell me it doesn’t look just like Sauwelios when you squish it all together).
You are very self-absorbed, Turd. I never said I am descended from aristocrats. I simply said that people DESCRIBE my whiteness as aristocratic white. This was in response to the accusation that I am a gypsy.
Most of my ancestors appear to be peasants but not all of them appear to have been hedonists.
My 2nd great grandfather was a very spirited man.
Being a peasant is nothing bad in itself. Being a hedonist is.
Not necessarily, one can be Hendonistic and still quite healthy.
This is what you Nietzscheans didn’t grasp when Nietzsche pilfered the Stoic concept of health.
I can chase in wild abandon every pleasure I choose, but the choice in each case may be coincidentally the best of choices I could reasonably make had I chosen to do so rationally. Stoic philosophy seeks to make a dependable life a good life, it is reasonable to assume a conditioned response of pleasure would arise reinforcing it.
Let’s say I had a addiction with water. Pure hendonism, I’m bathing in the fucking shit 2-3 times a day like a decadent, hot and cold, soapy or pure, drinking it left and right… is this necessarily bad? Circumstantially it can be, but for most of you stinky fuckers gobbling down soda and liqour, I say bring it on. It is good to become addicted to such a cheap and easily available resource, given the alternatives. Should I send such a person yo rehab to break their hydro addiction? Should you and I tag team them, me with a Bible and you with your Nietzsche, trying to bring them to reason?
Stoic philosophy would look upon such a individual as simultaneously a abnormality, indeed a hendonism, but also proof of Stoa Philosophy, how it can be learned over the long term.
The Quantitative, Qualitative, Control or Indulgence stuff, it can’t be said one or another in advance makes sense for all men, unless we know it melts our bodily constitutions or corrupts our brain beyond repair. I’m not exactly impressed with your bullshit overcoming theory. I’m not overcoming Hydrochloric Acid, I choose simply to abstain from drinking it. You can go be that Superman. I’m not gonna be some alchemical monk changing my internal constitutions to a Will To Power either, or a spiritual wizard. At some point, if you study enough cognitive systems, modern and ancient, you learn how to navigate and steam punk the various systems. I’m not intimidated by a archaic system, nor probe to dismissing them either- I can generally find bright ideas that relate to other system in them.
I’m not exactly impressed with Nietzsche’s grasp of psychology, and even less with the followers I come across on the next. Not completely rotten, but nobody upholds his common sense ideas, only his shit theories these days. Bizarre, but that’s how people are, we always build a cabinet of curiosities and claim it is a representation of the world, when it us really just a drive to systematize nonsense. The logic that binds the categorizations we give is pleasurable. Largely silly when you look at it from a outside perspective.
You don’t know what hedonism is.
Actually, I know it a lot better than you, I’m well read in the classics and modern psychology.
But you know, you read Nietzsche, and are from the country that the Casino in Casino Royale is from, so you clearly have a monopoly on this corner of knowledge.
Please, tell everyone how nobody knows what the fuck a hendonist is, and why you need a complex historical essay to grasp a pleasure whore’s addictive silly fucking mindset. I’m sure everyone will be enlightened.
That was sarcasm, don’t.
You don’t and you are not interested in understanding what the term means.
I’m too busy eating all the Halloween candies I took from kids knocking on my door on October 31st to take time to understand, gotta eat more.
Honestly, none of the decadents and aristocratic and spiritual natures shit, I already used my best jokes on Cezar. Your not in a position to win anyone over, either they agree with you, or they don’t, your not the first to deliver these revelations here on this forum. Notice Sauwelios doesn’t even try anymore? He done fucking did it already. Nothing resulted, cause he was either preaching the the choir or people better educated who could dismiss him with ease.
Please don’t… Don’t. Just admit your wrong and let’s move on, pretending we had that argument and moved on from it.
Sauwelios and Fixed Cross do not understand what hedonism is. They are hedonists themselves, so it makes sense.
They are not true Nietzscheans. They are libertarians. So a victory over their philosophy amounts to nothing.
Historyboy/Cezar, on the other hand, understands very well what hedonism is. But you never really won against him.
Lies cannot defeat truth.
This is how hedonists look:
The smile on his face is telling you that he has successfully “overcome” himself by repressing his painful instincts.
Imagine being in pain your entire life and then suddenly figuring out a way to feel good.
That’s what that smile is telling you.
I insist that you have no clue whatsoever what hedonism is. This is proven by the fact you have no clue what the related concept of addiction refers to.
Doing something very often is not addiction. It’s merely a pattern of behavior that may or may not be indicative of addiction.
Addiction is an over-expression of instinct. It is one half of repression. The other half is under-expression of some other instinct (or instincts.)
Addiction is unconditionally bad. There are no circumstances in which it is good.
Patterns of behavior, on the other hand, have a conditional value.
Psychogenic Polydipsia
Try to keep up. Cezar was defeated because he turned into a lazy decadent who couldn’t keep up or fact check. He eventually became overwhelmed and failed. Your fast tracking like him.
And no, a picture of a man on a dreary beach isn’t evidence of Hendonism. Your not in a position to assert a Hylomorphic Characture of a Psychology of a individual based on face alone, when you think the conscious of men sits outside of the body, yet insist you can read the typology of character at the surface.
A smiling fat man in a rain jacket on the beach isn’t indicative of any of the traits you’ve mentioned, none are based on apparent physiology, via traits we can trace back to cognitive processes centered around brain regions. You have nothing related in that picture to his possible past. No clue- he might be a working his job, his co worker shipping out a picture saying “smile”.
You’ve presented a unaccountable typology. You need to make efforts to explain it more reasonably. I can usually get my attempts very, very close, you can see it on Similarminds.com under my name TrollEmperorOfDoom in the photographic typology section. I had very high scores. You have probably the least skill of anyone I ever met so far. You attempt really sucks.