αίσχος = shame; a morally reprehensible act; physical ugliness, dysmorphia.
So… ignoble?
Whatchu talkin about willis?
Maybe the opposite of noble is vain, as when we fall from Yes with an arbitrary no. And maybe the only way to reconcile that is for the Yes to demonstrate it is always Yes.
And how many womans today are willing to accept this role being thrust upon them? Zero.
For that matter, how many men today are willing to accept their own role in this, to be “in charge of everything else”? Also zero.
You fuckin retards live in the past in your own minds, then blame the causes of things changing for your own problems. Ok, sure. Blame them, they did it. So what? What exactly are you going to do about it, whine and cry on the internet? LOOOOLLLL yeah exactly, that’s what I thought. You ain’t doing nothing about any of it. Just jerk off your own ego. Wow, amazing. You are SOOO different from your enemies 
That was a joke, of course. And since I know you are too deliberately dumb to realize it. You are a mind-slave created by your enemies, the perfect “tolerable marginal” crying shit online and acting touch in between fingers hitting your keyboard. Honestly it’s so pathetic a response isn’t even merited. But there ya go. At least your trolling got some meager reply, eh?
Christ. Just imagine being you. No way, couldn’t.
Well of course nobody wants anything thrust upon them, but there are very many women who take it on voluntarily.
The same is true of men who take their role on voluntarily.
I don’t know the actual stats, but it’s definitely not zero.
Now, if either the men or the women have had bad experiences, they are less likely to want to do it again. Especially if they have the same repeat experiences over and over again. Or if they’ve had the same repeat experience for a long number of years.
But the fact is … not everybody has bad experiences. At least not bad enough to never want to do it again.
That, or they have bad memories (as in, they forget stuff). Or whatever the phenomenon is that makes women forget how horrible the hell of labor is so they don’t just stop at one kid. Because you know nobody’s walking back into that situation out of the kindness of their own heart. I imagine the same has to be true for someone who is willing to marry again after having … a very bad experience.
I always find it amusing how men have difficulties with women. Usually, it is because of some preconceived idea of what a woman should do, look like, or think. It also seems to be based on a lack of experience, a chip on their shoulder, and their own stupidity—although they would disagree with that.
I am an average man in almost everything. Nothing is outstanding about me, except that I have managed to enter situations without prejudgement or adjust my judgements based on experience. I have also listened and observed a lot and seem to have understood what women in their varying relationships with me need. At least my colleagues and subordinates have told me so. They have also told me what they needed of me, primarily to be a man and not some softy, but also not to pull back from any task.
Consequently, they made me their supervisor, manager, and regional manager. I say that because when I left these positions, they made a huge fuss and visited me in later positions to tell me how they missed me. Now, remember, I have said nothing is outstanding about me, and I tend to think that what made me stand out was that other men refused to do the necessary. In a way, they stepped back from the responsibilities, leaving me in front.
I have met women who objected to the role I was given in nursing, saying that it was a man’s privilege to be given higher positions. As I said, I made a point of not using my advantage in that way. I was even voted in as an employee representative. Therefore, whenever a man told me they were having difficulties with the female staff, we looked at what he was doing wrong. They were successful if they worked on that, but otherwise, they had to go.
I even had a member of the Desperado motorcycle gang come to me as a trainee after being thrown out of another house. I took on the stance I used with soldiers and told him clearly that I would support him if he obeyed; otherwise, he would be out on his ear. The first thing he had to change was to no longer wear his heavy boots when he was on the ward. Strangely, everything went well, and he passed his exams.
The stats were non-zero not that long ago. Today, they are… as close to zero as to basically be called non-zero. And yes we are talking about the modern world, not places where people still live pre-modern existences.
"No equality.
Each gender/sex has their role.
In Timocracy the female was in charge of the home; the male in charge of everything else."
Let me go ahead right now and count on my fingers how many females I’ve known, met or seen IRL who want to assume a traditional female gender role… oh yeah, it’s zero.
I have literally never known a single female who was like “I want to have a family, be a good mother and wife and build a beautiful home”. Yeah, no one says that anymore. Literally zero females say that today, at least in “the west”.
A woman is going to be a good wife/mother when she is allowed & encouraged to be by a good husband/father, and vice versa.
“sober, honest, loyal, and tender” are all great qualities for any individual/group to cultivate together
[I was deleting this part when it saved it instead. Fricken.]
I am wondering if Tomboy girls are necessary for Human Evolution.
Because if a man inseminates a feminine women, maybe a karen who’s recessed, then they get recessed offspring, maybe even small stature and physically weaker.
Yep! Totally agree.
It’s interesting that there is an argument for A-Theory that says it emasculates God if he isn’t alone before (without) creation, but the Trinity implies he’s never alone. And then you have to think about what true power is, especially if the Holy Spirit is the helper for us (and God’s power is perfected in weakness), like the woman is the helper for the man, and empowers him more fully (to fulfill his capacity) (and as that is her function, if he rejects her, he rejects her fulfilling her capacity), and when God walks among us, it is as the servant of all; servant leadership being the most masculine, according to God. And if you have no one to serve, how are you going to be masculate before (without) creation? I say this whole idea of being ontologically prior and timeless (state of affairs without creation/time) and unchanging (but not unchangeable) is a combination of A and B theories, which (if they are truly antithetical) necessitates C theory (synthesis that has always been). Love is not love without demonstration.
As long as no open frontiers exist, mankind will continue feminizing.
Necessity.
14 posts were split to a new topic: Thread stalking
I would call it narcissism. Ever noticed how gay couples often look like brothers, or even twins?
If I knew what that even meant I would still find it hard to believe. Your passive/aggressive ‘understanding’ of women is nearly as repulsive as the rampant open misogyny on this site.
Right there…that’s feminization.
Each sex has the physical and mental traits necessary to successfully, carry out its specialized reproductive role.
The idea that men and women are EXACTLY the same…and that the hormones that create males has no effect on the brain, is as dishonest as the idea that natural selection affects the body but leaves the brain unaffected.
Virtue signalling is also a way beta males make themselves noticed to modern females, indoctrinated into feminist ideals.