Check this fractalicious beast out:
ouch.
Everything bad happens because of Satan.
No god involved in hurricanes.
I wonder why Job assumed he was talking to God instead of Satan when God spoke from the whirlwind?
Iām certainly not the one drawing a connection to this particular hurricane with the circumference of apparently spawned storms.
I never spoke to Job.
It wasnāt my job.
Probably tonn by prove a connection to tha anology of the sources to an eastern god paved the way to link the riches in the east needed no sacrafice because he was born rich, as in the west poverty exemplified no such sacrificial demonstration to denote the levels of objectivity between what should matter most
Hence victimization becoming superfluous in the course of enlightenment-wisdom/pleasure (principally)
_
Another thread ruined by idle chatā¦ whoād have thunk it. 
My bad , MagsJ, talking to me again, but there IS a method to the madness, to remind myself even in an odd way, where my position rests in relation to the constant flow of conversation
_
Well it is your thread, but youāre not the one that veered it off course, as the attention-seeker aboundedā¦ so the discretion was yourās to continue along that tangent.
Was nice chatting with you in hereā¦ for a while.
Boooooooo! Get off the stage!
The only reason I can account for veering off here, is that a tea opportunity may involve more than fascinating topics, more open endedl situation
_
Like I saidā¦ the discretion was yourās.
I see the attention-seeker is working extra-hard to be sought right now Meno_, by channeling ābullā ā¦in-keeping with their physicality. 
I see the ignorer is doing a really good job at ignoring. ā¦here as elsewhere.
_
Edited for clarity, for whom the entirety of my post was for. 
And like I said, of that needed discracionary duty, it is the forumās originator to bear responsibility, without prevy to be seen as a wilting flower , frought with top to bottom uncertainty, displaying a minimal shadow of significance that needs some substantial feed, lest it sink into the bottomless pit of a stage absconded of characters, letting the plot die an untimely death.
one for is enough
two fors is super-flow-us
Yes but 1x4=4 not 5
Yet 2X4= 4+4=8
If you into numbers trying to stay even
Which eventually āsinks-inā
3 is better than 2 & 1
Exactly, like all seekers, true to their word, at times of a need for heightened creativity, such efforts need to be demoted to the level of medieval restraint, as āEverymanā seeks their place in the sun.
As bulls charge apart from that medi-evil mode of expression.
Thatās how narrowly can bulls interpret sheepish choices, no wonder they there not jump to take either course.