And then me know I fly reaffirms that there a yet with likewise resilience as dungeon tenancy shares their uncommon thirst for truth and Justice, an UN changeable trait among the ‘knows’ even above that knowledge by an indeligable need to feel, above all, so dubious expressions that phenomena is unable to come through with.
Alas, sweet lady, forth not this sad parting be a signe of unfaithfll trepidity.
…I gotta whole house to finish clean/tidy… coz I may or might have a(n invited) guest coming over, some time soon. Though the hardest parts, are done. [/Parting is such sweet sorrow that I shall say
Absolutely, but the real question is wether Teutonic mythology precedes the Hellenic age in which Chopin was credited to be influenced with: the romaine of the Germanic element, to be able to be overcome by the transcendence of Hellene?
If yes, then we are stuck in the middle aged romantic tradition,
The Norse mythology that we know is younger than Greek mythology. This is because the earliest Greek myths were written down previous to the Norse myths being written down. The earliest writer of Norse myths was Snorri Sturlson, 1100 AD. The earliest writer of Greek myths was Hesiod, maybe 700 BC
I don’t know if the dates & names you just said are true or not, but regardless, don’t you think the oral tradition was around a long time before that, and how do you know how long before, if there is no written record?
So to conclude, we can faithfully support the transcendence of the love between Romeo and Juliet, founded in very defined principles of reasoning, whereas teutons exhibit an impulsive yet unsubstantial derivation of substandard and overly zealous proclivity to to act impulsively, may not illustrative to more southern, Italian climates’ effect on emotion.
Scandinavia is more a sobering and reclusive a moderation, within to revise the whole greec-Roman- temperance of an English interpretation of how a sobering effect of a cooling English sky have on such effects as Shelly and other Brit Romantics leaving for the sunny skyes of Italy, to find both splice and fear of returning, most scuttling that to a never returning self scuttling.
Oral traditions are to written , as Jesus parables are to scholastic traditions, which is more believable? The source of miracles the same way, very nearly arguable, from differing political points of view, debateable, and from the point of view of the Last Man, differences no longer signify a significant reason to argue the point, since most of them are and have narrowed such differences to a nominally exclusive willfull decision based on the Elizabethan question:
To be, or not to be, that is the question- meaning such are questions decided on a nominally exclusive access problem, the can not converge into social reality, not with standing the need/compulsion to arrive at an understood epoche of singularity before it’s own configuration of an infinitely repeat of time in it’s own measurement.
This question begs its self, before its own spatial-temporal sign has come to the point where they are ready to see beyond their borders, and extend them into a universally accepted realization. Until that time, blade runners will seek them out and destroy them , as threats to free will and self determination.
So it matters which came befor, only to satisfy those who have not attained existence to or near to the last.
_
Whether written down or not, all ancestral cultures had a history, a past, a way of loving…
Too analytic or too gung-ho ain’t sexy… so what-of a middle-ground mix of fire and ice/Apollonian x Dionysian? an oozing of emotion rather than a full on assault…