The death of Charlie Kirk

As you know, or don’t, a right wing, read fascist,
was shot to death in Utah yesterday… I have
a couple of thoughts…

One, one is the actual death of Kirk… from the looks
of it, the shooter seems to have some sort of training…
possibly military, but the FBI has stated they have
recovered the gun, and it had prints on it, a palm
print and more interesting, a forearm print…
but the picture of the ‘‘person of interest’’ shows
him with a long sleeve shirt… that alone gives us
pause… my guess, the government has no idea
who it is… and is just making shit up to cover their
ignorance… At this point, the government has to bring
in somebody, anybody to show that the government
is still in control… if the shooter should get away,
that will be bad… especially for the IQ45 fascist
regieme… it will show, correctly, that this administration
has no ability to protect us from violence…

The second point, and the far more interesting point for me,
is what this means…the right has been pushing violence
as a solution for the issues and problems facing us…
from IQ45 on down, the right has promoted violence against
any who voice ‘‘opposition views’’ recall that several times
the right has openly called for death to gay and trans people,
and IQ45 has called for violence against Liz Chaney,
among others… he has called for violence many times…

IQ45: I would bring back waterboarding. And I’d bring it
back a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding’’

IQ45: they said to me, what do you think of waterboarding.
I said, I think it’s great, but it doesn’t go far enough. Its true,
it’s true- right? We don’t go far enough. We don’t go far enough’’

about a protester: I’d like to punch him in the face’’

IQ45: Can’t you just shoot them? Just shoot them in the legs or
something’’

IQ45: And I’ll tell you something-- that’s the way it has to be.
There has to be retribution when you have a crime like this’’

In praising police for the killing of antifa supporter Michael Reinoehl,
who was accused of killing a right wing protester…

and there are plenty of examples of this type of rhetoric
coming from the right… and let us not forget the Jan 6
attempt to overthrow the government which left 5 deaths
and hundreds of injuries to policemen…

violence only begats violence… it offers us nothing else other
than more violence… and to bring us back around, Kirk himself
has praised violence… ‘‘some gun deaths are worth it to maintain
second amendment rights’’…

Kropotkin

3 Likes

Can you provide video evidence that Kirk said anything remotely similar to what Trump said?

…and do you drive a vehicle?

In short: the guy was an advocate of hatred, violence and divisiveness.

He reaped what he sowed.

1 Like

You should probably back that up, otherwise you’re guilty of doing the thing you’re accusing him of doing.

Well, the guy was certainly no angel:

1 Like

Who is an angel?

Certainly not him.

Listen, I’m not saying I’m happy the guy was shot. But pay attention to his discourse. He wasn’t exactly inviting people to love and cherish him.

2 Likes

.
¿..and that advocates him being shot/killed?

There is anti-[insert religion name here] sentiment all round.. that’s a lot of people to shoot, no?

1 Like

Y’either love ‘im or you hate ‘im, right?

Was he calling people a brood of vipers, or what? Turning over the tables of money changers in his father’s “house”?

Some angels sure can be kind of aggressive.

I’m not saying I’m on his side or not. I never heard of the guy before he was shot.

Why was he shot, though? Was he abusing children? Treating women like sex slaves? Selling the parts of babies to the highest bidding researchers? What’s the story there?

It remains to be seen, Surya, what exactly the shooter had in mind.

.

..but regardless of that?

If people have a really good reason for aggression which follows the rules of engagement (response matching and never exceeding severity and likelihood of risk), they have defensible (mitigated) decision-making.

…and hopefully a very good record of it that will stand up in court.

But if they remain silent, despite being innocent, you should really ask what they are trying to say with that… and what they might have up their sleeve.

Too many political killings and woundings in America, many of which are forgotten, even though they occurred this year:

Melissa Hortman and Mark Hortman (D)

The same day, Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette Hoffman, were shot in their home in a related attack but survived (D)

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro (D) and his family narrowly escaped an arson attack described as politically motivated

And now Charlie Kirk (R)

2 Likes

.
Should politicians, newsreaders, and any political-party supporters be allowed to put out such messaging?

..because it leads to celebrations like this:

.

Update:

So what exactly made him full of hatred or a fascist?

Ultimately, the one who killed Charlie is more of a fascist than Charlie was. That’s what people fail to realize, fascism = suppression of a political activist or voice by violent means. That’s one form of it.

Charlie Kirk’s advice for young people “Work for Free”

Charlie Kirk turned some heads when he said on his show that young job seekers should look for work that doesn’t offer any pay and work for upwards of twenty hours a day, even to the point where they become sick. Huh?

Even though he did not do any of that himself.

1 Like

TYT is awful lol.. and they didn’t even let him finish. All I heard from him was “You can work 20 hours a day, your body can handle a lot more stress”.. which is true, isn’t it?

The rest was her beginning to talk and “saying” what “he said”.

Anyone watching this video, check the comments section, you’ll see everyone calling the woman dumb because she is literally cutting off what he says so she can twist context, like so many liberal or left outlets do.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PV3s83BnoM

Check the comments sections in this one……

“I’m going to trust my friends in the government??.. Really? I’m going to trust my friends in the government??.. Oh Charlie!”

……….and now he is dead.

1 Like

No proof it was the government who did it anyway. So how is that relevant?