The physical, undeniable proof of my theory (finally!)

[matmilne]

excellent

that’s 2 in a row, gobbo.
see you in politics and maybee threads on jesus.
the orthodox church has always got me gander up, i would love to have a go at taking it appart sentence by sentence.

[Dan1 (Dan~)]

@gavtmcc

18?
This is surely - if true - a (negative) comment on the educational system you’ve emerged from.

As for your ‘theory’, perhaps youo can explain what happens when the ‘laws’ of physics - especially that of relativity - do not explain characteristics exhibited by/in black holes. Time becomes negotiable.

In any case, your ‘theory’ tells us nothing. You have made nothing resembling an original, provocative point. You have merely issued a confused, uninspired reflection which read more like a young guy recognising problems of observation and uncertaity in the universe around him and taking upon himself the grand task of explaining them (away). Better for you to go to a bookshop… so that you don’t lose sight of your perfectly respectable stimulus to comprehend…or you will quickly find that you get laughed at rather a lot.

The human body is a structure made of many specific parts which each do their job. Order and unity keeps us alive. In each cell rep the DNA degrades and imperfect internal replication is our problem.

Physical health peaks at the age of 18, and after sexual maturity the degrading of the adult begins. If this degrade is due to evolutionary neglect, matmilne’s “meaning of life” partians to the generation based “meaning” which was not “neglected by evolution”.

The individual “meaning” of life is to avoid loss, pain and damage, and then to gain as many pleasures/powers/allies as we can.

If technology were to stop death somehow, life would feel a lot less absurd.

[Disgruntled_Human]

@gavtmcc

How old are you?

13?

I really despise people who insist on knowing the age of the poster. Attack the post, not the person who made it. What part of his post suggests that he’s 13?

Why does the age matter if it’s the rhetoric/philosophy included in the post that really matters.

Not to say his ideas aren’t a little confusing and odd.

[Twiffy]

I entirely agree with Disgruntled Human.

Gavtmcc, I don’t like you at all.

1. Age has nothing whatsoever to do with an argument’s validity.
2. You are totally hypocritical. You bash someone for being young without saying anything close to relevant to his own points, and then you bring up an esoteric topic (black holes) just to sound smart. Your point was god-awful. Relativity can’t explain black holes?? How do you think we know ANYTHING about black holes, if not by using (among other theories) relavitity? It’s not like there’s a black hole in South America we can observe. And “time becomes negotiable”?? NEGOTIABLE?? Who the hell do you think you are? Did you read two popular physics books and then decide you could one-up a few high-schoolers out there? It’s fine to be ignorant about physics, as you clearly are, but for the love of god, don’t be such a crappy person so that you pretend you know a lot about physics just to bash some kid who, despite his fuzzy ideas, will probably do the world a lot more good than you.

For people like you, improving oneself comes before trying to improve others.