The secret language of numbers.

Philosophy Forums Science, Technology, and Math
1

The 9 you see at school is the peak of the Universe’s mathematical domain. This Universe doesn’t have numbers beyond 9 - instead it mixes numbers 1~9 to create numbers more than 9. Therefore 13, is actually a 4 (1 + 3).

A 18 is a 9 in 2nd Dimension. The 1 is creating a “point” which allows the Universe to create shapes, just like this __ has the potential to be turned into a triangle despite that your brain only registered a line.

108 is a 9 in 3rd Dimension.

1018 is a 9 in 4th Dimension.

To get 1080, you have to do 360 x 3. That is 1080.

This Universe is creating shapes via numbers. That is why the Universe works this way. 1080 is 180 in 4th Dimension rather than 3rd Dimension.

Three Full Circles create half of a Greater circle.

The reason why this Universe’s numbers can create a “180” again with three 360’s, is because that is how the Universe cycles and evolves at the same time. The numbers recycle back to 180, but the number also adds a 0 every time. This is the Universe’s way of creating dimension.

360 > 720 > 1080

1080 > 2160… Notice how 21 is actually (2 + 1)? That’s a 360, not a 21.

2160 > 4320… This is not a 43, this is (4 + 3).

That leads us to 6480. That is actually (6 + 4 = 1).

We need two 6480’s to make A Greater Greater Circle. “12960”. This is (1 + 2 + 9 = 3). This is also a “396”.

Notice how the first time, we had “1080” breaking the dimension.

This time, we had “12960” breaking the dimension.

That is an 8 and a 6.

This is the “Golden Ratio”.

1.2960 x 1.618 = 2.096928

2 x 96928 = |193856|.

The Golden Ratio’s number is: 1.6180339887.

I have “193856”.

x 2 = 387712

x 2 = 775424

x 2 = 1550848 ← As you can see, as soon as the numbers broke into the 7th dimension, it gave us a “155”, which is “1.55” and “55 x 2 = 110” or “155 x 2 = 310”. Then it gave us “848”…

My friend found 838.

I have 858, 868 and 898.

Now I have 848.

Some time later, I plan on putting them all together in context so we can see how numbers meticulously lead up to them. It’ll give us a way of seeing step by step how numbers behave and why the numbers between two 8’s are so mathematically innovative.

See this? Do you see this!? Everything I have been doing is connecting together.

Let’s go back to the number “7.65”.

6 + 5 = 11 (2)

That is a 72. What number did I stop on that gave me the numbers that connect to the number I got earlier? 72… That 116 and 496 are brilliant. Get this! 1 + 1 + 6 - |8|. 4 + 9 + 6 = |1|. This… Is…Unbelievable.

Do you see the 496?

That’s a 46… (92…)

Half of 46… is 23…

We have 23 pairs of chromosomes… and 46 altogether…

…

What were the numbers that were backwards, but lead me to another “123” and a “777”? 369 and 396.

So look to the left of 496. See the 116?

116 x 2 = |132|.

[size=200]This is fucking amazing![/size]

2

As you can see, “the Universe” is creating…

It does not go beyond the human finger count, with the 0 being the latter additive to balance it out.

There is no 1 anywhere, except in the mind that simplifies/generalizes, and fixes, to construct the simplified/generalization, of a singularity, by separating.
Later this separation, distancing, indicates a unity, in their minds, because it is a separation of the same experience of fluidity…which they can only conceptualize as a whole.

Instead of god we have the singularity of Uni-Verse, which creates.
It is not man, who uses numbers and words to describe, and understand the universe, the world, but the numbers, and the words, presumably - because numbers are nothing more than more abstracted words - is “creating”?

This is an example of how that slavish biblical nihilism becomes secular humanism…
It changes symbols, and terms, and but the underlying psychological attitude is unchanged.

From here on, appearances can be judged superficial and changeable, because in their Paradigm, it is.

This is age old desert-monopoly, using the same goals, and nihilistic presuppositions, only dismissing the God part repacked for a more modern consumer.
Didn’t Crowley say, spiritualism sells in any means because fraud on the bereaved is easy.

When one connects math to the geometry, both of which are representations of human abstractions, with an obvious internal, inherent, apriori, logic, thinking that one is exposing reality, the only thing one is “exposing” is human conceptions and human methods of making sense of reality.

Is one still unable to comprehend why a computer mirrors the human brain, why a guitar can be shaped like a spinal cord, and its tunes reflect human sonar apprehensions, and why a bulldozer reflects a human appendage, and why a television set works on the principles of neurological pulses?
Man believes he is uncovering the deep truth of the world when all he is doing is extending human abstraction to its extremest reach.
Math, for example, measures the mental models in the human brain.
He fabricates statics to do so - if these abstractions do, in fact, refer to a phenomenon, they approximate the dynamism, of the phenomenon by reducing it to a noetic static thing.

3
4

While you’re too busy being a skeptic because YOU cannot take the time to handle the space lion of knowledge,

I’ll be curing cancer.

I don’t play games with people that only try to unplug your controller. If you can’t handle my playing field; if you can’t play by the rules, get the hell off of it.

If you want to stay on that playing field, address my original post. Take what I wrote and prove it wrong. Otherwise, you are the one creating a preconception based on your own inept nuances. I, on the other hand, am working on something that is leading to the grandest of truths. The numbers do not lie. A molecule that looks like a fucking crab is all you need to see to realize that you’re not the one with the formulas - you’re not the one doing the research - you’re not the one diving into the abyss of reality. I AM, not YOU.

[b][size=200]What you’re doing is staying on the surface making up stories about what lies beneath the surface, then scaring people from diving themselves. I do not appreciate fools who kill curiosity and knowledge because they themselves do not have the capacity to wrangle with reality’s grandeur. It’s like you don’t even have the capacity to acknowledge the fact that what these numbers I work with represent (I can reverse-engineer the Periodic Table) exist outside of my mind - therefore all accusations of them being a construct of an extreme need to make something out of reality that isn’t there in actuality could only be moot.

And what you don’t seem to understand is that there are THREE types of people in this world: Those who make connections that aren’t there, those who make connections, and those who think every connection results in a cause =/= correlation fallacy because THEY cannot comprehend it (you). You would’ve held back Einstein, Junga, Nikola… Just as you try to hold me back with your nihilistic drivel. Wake the fuck up and stop trivializing everything just because life suddenly got too big for you to handle on my watch.

Also, Nietzsche was a schizoid.

I am a loving human being that feels everything on a magnified level. My passion burns brighter than all of our current futures combined. I want to learn and breakthrough every wall known to man. My words and my actions speak volumes. I am not here to play God; I am here to play Human. He who says there is no meaning to which he does not understand, is who does not have meaning themselves!

If I had a game show, it would be called “Make That Rhetoric!”. The team, “Make That Rhetoric!” will make up rhetoric, while the other team, “Face That Rhetoric!” would have to challenge the other team’s rhetoric.

As long as you do not challenge yourself by diving into someone’s points, you cannot make your own, because it’s a two-way street in a debate, not a one-sided window between an interrogator and an instigator.

Where is your scrutiny? You do not have scrutiny, so your “validity” has no security outside of your own impression, but that’s just a footprint in the sand, now isn’t it?

It’s sad that people would rather accept an opinion than accept the truth, just because the former feels good and the latter hurts. Yes and no are now people’s pleasure tools, I’m afraid; no longer practical reactions based on intellectual stimulation.

My responses are universally concerned, while your responses are personally consumed.

Nihilists are those who could not fight the eternal eye, which is irony at best, for one must not fight the eye; one must comply…

There are people who live as they are.

And there are people who live fearing what they can be.

Nihilists are those who know about life to the point their brain advanced their own strength.

There’s a difference between you and I. You defend what doesn’t exist - I defend what people forgot existed…

There are men who change when they had enough with their lies.

Then there are men who can only change when they hadn’t enough of their lies…[/size][/b]

5

The turmeric molecule is not a miniature crab, atoms are not tiny billiard balls, and strings in string theory are not vibrating ramen noodles. All of these are just models created by other people’s minds. You’re not diving into abyss of reality, you’re diving into (other people’s) mind models.

6

[u][size=200]No, that’s just your imagination being petty and then blaming it on other people’s imaginations.

Nobody is saying it’s a real crab or that numbers exist as we ascribe them through symbols (only a nihilistic tool would assume the least from intelligence) - we’re saying the subatomic particles are the reason why everything around us has its shape in the first place! Especially when you look at a Bee Hive, it’s based on hexagonal tessellations… Mathematically perfect. Look at a spider’s web. Look at all the tiny things and how they create the macro world. The fact of the matter is, this Universe is based on evolutionary design. We can see how things evolved into other things, like today’s dogs and birds are based on dinosaurs. Or how Uranus is tilted that way because the macro is mimicking the fractals of the subatomic world and the super atomic world! As above, so below; from form, to faculty; to, and fro![/size][/u]

[size=200]I know why Uranus is tilted the way it is. You don’t. You’re too busy spending the time of your life dragging other people down because you’re a nihilistic tool who can’t comprehend the Universe’s grand scheme. You in a nutshell: “I’m going to judge your certainty with my uncertainty!”.[/size]

All you do is talk fluff.

You have nothing to show.

Therefore, everything you say is just a reflection of your flatulent mindset.

I am tired of people like you thinking your ignorance is as good as our intelligence, when we do the work - when we do the research - when we make breakthroughs. All you’re doing is condescending someone who can cure cancer. It’s pathetic. Learn your place, learn some self-humility and realize the possibility you never ever took the time to consider, that maybe… maybe, just maybe YOU DON’T COMPREHEND IT.

7

Don’t know if these pictures of atoms are real but I am sure they are, why wouldn’t they be. The first one is hydrogen atom. “Hydrogen atom, with electron orbit imaged for the first time”

atom picture.jpg
atom picture.jpg724×529 50.9 KB

atoms.jpg
atoms.jpg1920×1080 100 KB

Turmeric.jpg

8

The universe only appears to have threes, positive, neutral, and negative. There are no 1’s or 2’s, it is not linear. …imho :slight_smile:

Even in our minds you have; perception = negative, experiencing consciousness = neutral, and will = positive ~ which is thus the opposite of perception, we just cant perceive it in the way we understand the perception, possibly because the perception is inbound and the will is outgoing. Its a matter of function.

9

What does that have to do with the work I am doing?

Nothing.

Does everyone here really think that every response they make is autonomously credited because they made it? If you’re going to respond, learn how to assess yourself and address the discussion at heart instead of talking on a flat line.

The only people that addressed the topic are the very people that actually understand the topic. I have absolutely no need to be affiliated with people who might as well call me, set their phone on the opposite side of the fucking room and start yelling at the phone from their opposite end.

Everyone else just made up “opinions” - I don’t care about your shapeless points. Come here when you can draw a dimension with your thoughts, otherwise you’re not contributing.

We are here to cure cancer. We are not here to play word salad. It shouldn’t even be called that; nothing healthy about it in the first place.

10

Maths IS a language. It is a language of abstraction and quantification. What is the secret you think you are eluding to? That the language is consistent with itself?? That is the whole point surely?

You haven’t actually explained what you imagine these numbers reveal if they can be said to reveal anything whatsoever. How does any of this contribute to your desire to see cancer eradicated?

11

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=187035&start=100

Page 5 demonstrates that numbers have been creating physical objects via the “Magic Square”. That is,

1 4 7
2 5 8
3 6 9.

If you still don’t get it, then perhaps you should stop making up your own reality and accept the one and only reality that governs your senses called the Universe. Whether you like it or not, understand it or not, want it or not, you are not the clock work - you are experiencing the clock work.

12

How can a language create anything? The numbers may signify quantities and elude to relationships but how can a human mental construct be the thing that creates physical objects in reality? Numbers only relate to human beings and their theoretical models. If we didn’t exist neither would they… so how can numbers create anything?? Surely you have put the cart before the horse…

[/quote]
What? Are you unable to see how it is YOU imagining yourself to be the clockwork? Numbers are only understood by (some) human beings. They aren’t real tangible things, they just refer to real world phenomena symbolically. Saying that numbers ‘create’ anything seems to be a profound misunderstanding of what numbers actually are.

13

Because all numbers 1~9 are not imaginary all the way. The numbers as symbols are imaginary. What they represent are the subatomic ticks of particles and energy. Why do you think the Periodic Table has numbers that accurately count the subatomic particles of a molecule? The point is not the numbers - the point is WHY the molecules have “this many” atoms (e.g protons/neutrons) and how we can communicate what the ATOM HAS. The atom, itself, contains X amount of protons and neutrons. That “number” of neutrons and protons is the important factor, not the symbols we use to express that factor. What you don’t seem to understand is that IF what these numbers represented were “meaningless” or “imaginary”, we wouldn’t have Science, Math or Astrology. We do, because these symbols we’re using, just like our very own language that you hypocritically use (you say numbers are mental constructs, when they are representing an intrinsic construct, but you never say anything about how the noises you make are the same fucking mental construct) are there to represent what is REAL.

I shouldn’t have to explain this… This is bloody common sense…

What are you talking about? You’re telling me what I already know. We don’t say “the sounds we’re making to represent X”, so why do you expect me to say “the numbers we’re using to represent X”. Anyone in their right mind will know that I am using numbers outside and inside regardless of the fact that they are just symbols. Here’s what you don’t get - ideologically, numbers are real. People ascribe meaning to them. YOU choose to take it literally, and that’s YOUR problem.

Why am I even wasting my time telling you this? Every code for any computer or game explains that it’s all symbols that are used to represent “what is”. We don’t play games and see all these numbers in the RPG world, nor do we see more than just symbols in the computer chip.

Address the topic and stop with these petty questions. Do you see all the work I did? Do you? No, because you’re too busy asking me stupid questions.

14

Dear idiot, you are not well. You claimed numbers create physical objects. This cannot be true and is an illogical statement. End of discussion. If you want to rephrase your unhinged ramblings so that sane people can relate to your theories then do so, otherwise, go and seek help.

Concerning other languages, are any of them capable of creating physical objects? Here is a new word for you: Flobbadegooksciously. Does the mere utterance of this word create something tangible in observable physical reality?? No, because words like numbers, allow us to explore and refer to what is there, they do not create things in and of themselves ex nihilo.

Sorry for being so pedantic as to hold you to what you have actually said, but, you know, this is a philosophy forum, and, words when used appropriately, refer to real things. Your excitement over seemingly coincidental numerical values and inappropriate use of numerology are stupid, and your emotional reaction to criticism suggests you are delusional and heavily invested in your delusions.

15

[b][size=200]That’s why this planet’s tilt is at the same exact degree of tilt as these “degenerate orbitals” that I quote, “scientists still do not understand”?

Sorry, I don’t have time for your nihilistic games. If you don’t want to address my posts constructively, instead only care to puff gas, go drive up to the congress and see if they’ll let you in. You’re not doing that here.

The only point you made was that my reaction towards you is not helping my image. It’s true, I have no reason to behave like this, but I really am tired of people like you who think you can say anything you want and not show any work of your own. I am showing my work - you have all the time in the world to take my work and prove it wrong. INSTEAD, you mouth it off because you don’t know what you’re talking about. Just because you can talk, doesn’t mean you know how to talk. Remember, even a baby can talk.[/size][/b]

16

All you are showing is a bunch of seemingly unrelated numbers dude. And the fact remains that you claimed numbers create physical objects, which as I have explained, is monumentally retarded. You haven’t apologized for being so clumsy or unclear and you haven’t corrected yourself, in fact, you seem to have doubled down. If your theories are so airtight and tangible, go and do something with them. Go and find some real world substantiation for your model. Calling people nihilists because they point out your rejection of reality and preference for a world of models and numerical values is a transparent projection of your own detachment from the actual world.

On second thought, just keep posting this stuff. Comedy Gold.

2 5 67 4 5 677 3 00 8 009 3 5 7 - if you know what I mean.

17

Because that is the way someone drew the cartoon.
And you might want to learn what “degenerate orbital” means (they don’t have “angles”).
Within a complex molecule, each atom will necessarily be limited and bound at given angles relative to the other bound atoms. Their spacing forms a relative angle in 3 dimensions between the atoms.

It has absolutely nothing to do with numbers.

How do you suppose they got it to stand still for the camera? :icon-rolleyes:

:text-yeahthat:

18

If you want to play numerologist, you really should learn Quantum Physics. They are the modern day numerology experts, Godwannabes ready to cure all ailments.

19

What the numbers represent create the fabric of reality. That is why 360 x 3 = 1080 (that’s a 180 in the 4th dimension). That is why 5/9 of Pi equals The Golden Ratio. That is why 5/9 is directly linked to Music Theory, hence the “Major Note” is 5:4. Furthermore, my friend and I created the "Pentagonal Bipyramid: with numbers alone. We didn’t know what we were getting ourselves into until the numbers created actual shapes we could visually see for ourselves. At first, he only had: . As you can see, my friend and I were just as unsure of these things as you are and we were working with these numbers for fuck’s sake. These numbers are not for the feint of heart; they are creating the fabrics of space. You can learn a lot about which color is in which frequency mathematically. You can learn a lot about which molecules form which structure. You can learn a lot by understanding how numbers behave through 1/9 ~ 9/9 of Pi. You can learn a lot by understanding how these numbers created everything. I can cure cancer. I can reverse-engineer the Periodic Table. I can figure numbers out before I finish the formula. This is not even intelligence, mate. This is divine intuition. This is forming a bond with space and matter as it formed a bond with our existence. You can learn a lot when you stop trying to learn what you want and let the brain take over. The brain is a self-evolving, self-transcending, self-experiencing organ, hence why people can do all sorts of things and not know 1% of why or how their human body works. The entire clock work is involuntary, while we only experience the clock work.

1 1 6 is not One-Hundred and Six. To assume that anybody is this stupid makes you a fool beyond fools.

116 is 1.16.

1.16 x 1.618 = |1.87688|.

7 x 6 = |42|.

8 x 8 = 64.

7 + 8 = 15

  • 6

That is |85|.

Notice that this “random” sequence of numbers just created a 42 & 85. 42 x 2 is 84. These numbers are not random - they are shuffled around by the Universe itself.

85 is 0.1 away from 86, which is the Golden Ratio. I do not have to look and I can tell you exactly “85” is based on 5/9 of Pi.

Another thing to take into consideration. This Universe is based on 4’s. Why? I’ll show you. 4/10, 8/10, 12/10, 2/10, 6/10, 10/10. This is how the Universe evolves via numerical values. Now, watch this. The number 36 is 1/10. 72 is 2/10. 144 is 4/10. 288 is 8/10. What is 72 + 288? |360|. Remember that pentagonal bipyramid I showed you earlier? Guess what its mathematical value is. 288. Guess what number creates its fractals? 36.

Still don’t believe me? I do not care. I can cure cancer. I can break Pi’s sequence and the Golden Ratio’s sequence. I can reverse engineer the periodic table. I know why Uranus is tilted. I know how to connect our human body to Pi’s sequence of numbers. I know how to tie the Fibonacci Sequence, Pi and The Golden Ratio to our DNA’s numerical sequence. I know how to improve on Fibonacci’s sequence. I know that this entire Universe is using a One Full Circle & 1/10 of a circle mathematical system to create its spirals. I know how to tie that system to Pi’s fractional value points. I know exactly how this Universe evolves via numerical values: The Solar System evolved on “11”, which is why we have 9 planets, a moon and a sun; our astrology signs evolved on “12”; our lives evolved on “13”, hence why we have a mysterious 13th star sign called “Ophiuchus” (I also can tie my numerical values to where you can find him in the stars); we have 23 chromosomes and 46 altogether (1 + 3 = 4; 2 + 3 = 5; 4 + 6 = 1).

My friend and I have a number that has been doing the most work out of all the numbers we’ve worked with: “4 5 1”. What is 4 5 1? Well, I’ll show you exactly what these numbers can do because they aren’t just a normal four, five and one. Let me show you the numerical principles of these numbers and how they behave through fabric and space: & .

In the first image, this is Music Theory. The “Major Note” is 5:4. That’s because 5/9 is the Golden Ratio of Pi. This “4 5 1” we have is based on 4/9 + 5/9 = 1.

In the second image, we can see clearly that this number “4 5 1” is beyond this physical world. It’s creating the very fabric of space by balancing our Anima/Spirit as well as Life/Death.

I have nothing to prove to you. I don’t care if you don’t understand it. I have all the knowledge in the world.

20

Numbers do not represent a fabric for anything but a mind.

Then you should know how to be more convincing.