And do you think it is primarily “deep mental thinking” that frees us from primitive biological hardwiring? Or perhaps it is something else, or more?
1 Like
I could agree to that to some extent, but men’s sexuality is largely reactionary to that of women’s.
2 Likes
Now THAT is entirely fucking true.
1 Like
Is any of that gobbledygook supposed to actually mean something? You don’t fucking speak for women, arsehole.
2 Likes
The fact you needed to get in here and say that proves he does speak for you at least 
And that you don’t like it, but tough shit.
1 Like
In your defense and somewhat in opposition to the OP, we may reconsider “transactional” as nothing more than:
having high standards of value
And there is certainly nothing wrong with that!
2 Likes
Really? It ‘proves’ that? Keep sucking each other off you pathetic retards.
3 Likes
2 Likes
Hey I defended you, no need to start sex shaming me!
2 Likes
2 Likes
Another side to every story:
2 Likes
You seriously expect anyone to actually read all that gobshite?
2 Likes
In the traditional situation, where the woman’s sexuality is regulated by her parents, men must compete for sex and without even knowing if they are sexually compatible with the woman they compete over. The men are judged in terms of capital. They have even less access to sex. Women who are looking for capital, nowadays, also look for sex for sex sake. At least many of them. So, men who might not have passed the traditional family and societal test, get access to sex. And once you have that, you may also get access to heart, however much people try to separate it. And women are, in general, less likely to keep sex and love apart, even when they go for the bad boy they would never marry. Sex, traditionally, was part of marriage only. And romantic love was often peripheral or considered a naive factor in marriage. The whole damn thing was a proto capitalistic interaction. You think those poor boys were getting a lot of sex with the women they wanted to have sex with in traditional cultures???
But I said ‘always been’ greenfuse? Yes, you did, but then you said ‘without regulation, etc……’ and female sexuality was heavily regulated in traditional societies.
How have men always been in relation to sexuality?
1 Like
“I am actually arguing a majority of women or females the concept of love has always been laegely transactional hence the name of the thread being sexual capitalism.”
For men too. You give me your child bearing power and I will protect you. Still within that situation, people choose preferred character traits. Love has to exist inside reality. Sometimes it doesn’t and it’s very intense but it doesn’t last.
“For me a majority of women are sexual capitalists. Always has been from the very historical beginnings of humanity.”
If you are sexually attractive and most young women are, men are going to fight over you. You are not going to go with the weakest, laziest, dumbest, sickliest because then you’re still going to get raped. You are going to go with the one capable of protecting you and raising the child.
“Female sexuality without regulation, limitation, intervention, and supervision is basically sexual eugenics revolving around male capital. Female sexuality revolves around male competition, power, influence, and dominance or otherwise the inequality of men competing against other men. Female sexuality is biological inequity.”
Female power which I admit is greatly sexual is a stimulus for men to compete, like male power is a stimulus for females to compete.That competition is probably what got us from looking like apes because of being apes, to being what we are.
2 Likes
Raped by the weakest?
What do you mean by female power?
1 Like
No I mean if you hook up with a weak guy in a jungle, he’s not going to protect you from the predators. That’s why you hook up with predators. This can also be a financial predator. That’s a bottom line in many cases.
I was referring to female sexual power. Let’s not make this more complicated than it has to be. Obviously there are a lot of other factors to being attractive than survival strength and sex. Beyond this you want someone who is not a drag do be with.
This topic is very ugly and reductionist im sorry I get drawn into that.
2 Likes
“Love has exist in reality.”
And what kind of reality is that?
“If you are sexually attractive and most young women are, men are going to fight over you. You are not going to go with the weakest, laziest, dumbest, sickliest because then you’re still going to get raped. You are going to go with the one capable of protecting you and raising the child.”
This is where a woman’s superficial and superfluous nature comes into play.
You have such a poor understanding of power dynamics and power structures where the female emotionally driven brain reduces everything to mere appearances without any more mental depth than that. Those weak or weaker men that you see are there because other men conquered them and reduced them to that in vanquishing them.
Men only rape or sexually assault women because they feel powerless. Why is that?
Because female sexuality is the status quo as it always aligns to authority of those who have power. Female sexuality aligns itself to male power.
Females and women in general are the political status quo incapable of any real rebellion to any large extent.
“Female power which I admit is greatly sexual is a stimulus for men to compete, like male power is a stimulus for females to compete.That competition is probably what got us from looking like apes because of being apes, to being what we are.”
It is this over zealous need or desire for constant competition that is going to eventually destroy all of society and civilization as competition is more valued over cooperation.
It is that over competition causing us to remain as primitive animals instead of becoming more evolved human beings.
It always amuses me how women see men in terms of superior and inferior or stronger and weaker on one hand, then clinging for social sexual equality on the other. Always comes off as a tad bit hypocritical.
“This topic is very ugly and reductionist im sorry I get drawn into that.”
Not a fan of reductionism?
“Love has exist in reality.”
And what kind of reality is that?
Nature. Competition, evolution.
“If you are sexually attractive and most young women are, men are going to fight over you. You are not going to go with the weakest, laziest, dumbest, sickliest because then you’re still going to get raped. You are going to go with the one capable of protecting you and raising the child.”
This is where a woman’s superficial and superfluous nature comes into play.
You have such a poor understanding of power dynamics and power structures where the female emotionally drive brain reduces everything to mere appearances without any more depth. Those weak or weaker men that you see are there because other men conquered them and reduced them to that in vanquishing.
Woman biologically does not have the luxury of fickleness, she has to carry the baby in her womb for 9 months, she is physically weaker so has to discern very acutely. She needs to be stable. But abortion culture is of course working to the detriment of that natural state of womanhood, the anchor of the family.
“Behind every strong man is a strong woman”
Men only rape or sexually assault women because they feel powerless. Why is that?
Let me guess, because a woman makes him feel powerless?
Because female sexuality is the status quo as it always aligns to authority of those who have power. Female sexuality aligns itself to male power.
Female sexuality is power. And yes, a powerful person enjoys another powerful person. That does not have to be a sicko, though, and usually isn’t.
“Female power which I admit is greatly sexual is a stimulus for men to compete, like male power is a stimulus for females to compete.That competition is probably what got us from looking like apes because of being apes, to being what we are.”
It is this over zealous need or desire for constant competition that is going to eventually destroy all of society and civilization as competition is more valued over cooperation.
Cooperation works only in a system of competition. Any company or cooperation will show you that. You mistake competition for hostility.
Discarding competition you get things like affirmative action and reward for being incompetent.
It is that over competition causing us to remain as primitive animals instead of becoming more evolved human beings.
China like all great powers is hypercompetitive, people compete like mad for favorable position.
It’s not competition within our nations that drives us into the abyss, rather the discouragement of it by foreign sabotage. The Chinese love to see our affirmative action and our lowering of standards in education to let ‘no child left behind’. And yet, as much better as their elementary school results are, we still beat them in the higher echelons of the mind, because we don’t suppress critical thought. With us, people know how to enjoy a free debate. So ideas can emerge despite there being lots of kids that can’t even spell.
2 Likes