Got it, you don’t actually have any real questions, you only asked them out of a desire to avoid. That’s understandable, though disappointing. Would have been interesting to actually get some real insight from you.
.
All hearsay and conjecture, from you, plus… I don’t wanna share my insights, coz they ain’t free yo!
.
Bored now, bye!
1 Like
In relevant news, seeing the Trump campaign distance itself from Tony Hinchcliffe is amusing.
https://www.axios.com/2024/10/29/trump-comment-puerto-rico-rally-tony-hinchcliffe
“I don’t know him, someone put him up there. I don’t know who he is,”
“This joke does not reflect the views of President Trump or the campaign,” Trump campaign senior adviser Danielle Alvarez said in a statement earlier this week.
As a Kill Tony watcher, it’s very funny to see this organization hire him to say words, and then immediately backtrack from the words he said.
I’m 74. Whichever way the selection goes it will be the most consequential of my lifetime because the stakes include the basic democratic institutions in America including the justice system as compromised as it already is at the top. Trump is already only able to go forward politically because the system has failed to hold him accountable. At this point, Harris represents the mainstream political consensus in this country. But, she has to overcome deep seated prejudices against women and blacks which Trump not only holds but for whom he has become the spokesperson and posterboy.
1 Like
What a load of lying crock!
Just one moment of your time gentlemen and just look at an archived picture of a president who has more fines in one finger than what’s available today.
Then think digitally, as it were, correlated with the current times happening under our very noses, and say you disagree with the feeling that there must be terribly wrong here, where it’s not the actor president’s failure to get to the position he tries to occupy, , but the situation that created it.
What could that be and may it be a good thing in disguise? After all , the belief in the power of the cosmos implies miraculous turn arounds, and such is needed more than ever. maybe a case of what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, is applicable here.
You already replied to that you sweet heart. It bored you, remember?
Believe it or not that it’s not what’s in my mind re. That. It’s concern for It that’s flooding the gates, that is it’s worth repetition cause someone, could be anyone hasn’t learned their history lesson adequetly, regardless if it’s the second time or till this side of the pearly gates.
Sorry flannel, (may be too late) for insisting that references could be adduced to more than to whom it’s indicated, otherwise forget it, don’t mean anything by it,
Playing the devil’s advocate here, because the ‘deal’ of the offer could not be refused, or denied as having been proffered.
I don’t know what any of that means brother, stay hydrated.
1 Like
U mean dry(coughing statistically, not sarcastically, where have you been ?
I like Brahman overdrive can’t help it
Didn’t mean to have sounded like it did
Yeah, it’s either that or staying dry
.
Free will, autonomy, etc… ya know…
Supreme Court rejects push to remove Robert F. Kennedy Jr. from ballot in two swing states
By LINDSAY WHITEHURST, 49 mins ago
The Associated Press
Follow
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., speaks before Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump at a campaign rally at Madison Square Garden, Sunday, Oct. 27, 2024, in New York. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected an emergency appeal to remove Robert F. Kennedy Jr. from the presidential ballot in two battleground states.
Kennedy wanted to get off the ballot in Wisconsin and Michigan after dropping his independent bid and endorsing Republican Donald Trump in the tight contest. He argued that keeping him on violated his First Amendment rights.
Michigan and Wisconsin said removing his name now, with early voting underway days before the election, would be impossible.
The justices did not detail their reason in rejecting the emergency appeal. Justice Neil Gorsuch dissented in the Michigan case.
The presence of independent and third-party candidates on the ballot in swing states could be a key factor in the close presidential race. The high court previously rejected Kennedy’s separate effort to stay on the ballot in New York, a state where his presence is unlikely to make a difference in the race between Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris.
Kennedy has been working to get off the ballot in the seven key swing states since endorsing Trump. Wisconsin and Michigan are the last two where his name was expected to appear.
In Michigan, he notched an appeals court win but courts ultimately found he had missed the deadline to withdraw as the candidate of the Natural Law Party, which had wanted him to stay on.
In Wisconsin, courts found that qualified candidates who file nomination papers must remain on the ballot unless they die, and a plan to cover Kennedy’s name with stickers was unworkable.
This may become an issue that may come and resulting in post election challenges. gut level churning
.
In relevant news…
…after the Tony Hinchcliffe debacle, Latinos came out in their droves online to say ‘can’t people take a joke anymore and that they would still be voting for Trump’, so when you have people like @Flannel_Jesus ‘thinking for others’ it sets a very dangerous precedent for enforced-victimhood, which then fuels the ‘race war’ further… or, as I like to call it, thinking for others is dangerous
.
Regarding the black/brown equation… if a person is sub-Saharan African, that person is considered black by the African demographic… if a person is of nonsub-Saharan African descent, that person is not considered black.
So… voting for one of the two main parties, means not wasting your vote, unless you actually do want to waste your vote that is, so all people of all colours vote for whomever they want.
.
How a, contentious, black lady thinks… the way she talks about other ethnic groups is disgraceful.
.
Odd, to leave Kennedy on the ballot forms, seeing that he isn’t even running anymore.
He had already conveyed to his voter base, months ago, to give their votes to Trump… so they already know what to do.
It’s not that odd. There’s a deadline for a reason. Ballots are physical objects, they need to be prepared beforehand. If I print 2 million ballots and some idiot says “I don’t want to be on the ballot anymore”, too bad. You’re too late. 2 million of anything costs a lot of money to screw around like that.
Trump’s rally at Madison Square Garden signaled his connection to the fascist America First Party that held a rally there in 1939. The America First Policy Institute which backs Trump is pro-Big Oil. “Drill baby drill” says Trump to the rest of us suckers.
.
Sure… though running the ballots through a printing press to blot his entry out, could have been a cost-effective option.
The higher the print-run, the lower the cost per unit…
Seems easier just ignore the late request because it’s late. No effort spent, no money spent, all rules followed.
What’s the downside?
.
I did say “could have”… no downside, I’m just a stickler for perfection.