Big Frank Butcher might object 
Amelia is a fictional, purple-haired Goth schoolgirl from the UK government’s Pathways programme. Navigating the Internet and Extremism’ video game. The game was funded by the Home Office’s Prevent programme to educate 13–18-year-olds about the dangers of far-right radicalisation.
Starting around 9 January 2026, far-right online communities hijacked her image after she was covered in outlets such as The Telegraph and GB News. By mid-January, they had flooded platforms such as X with over 10,000 AI-generated posts daily, turning her into a viral ‘waifu’ icon spouting anti-immigration, racist and Islamophobic rhetoric, such as warnings about ‘militant Muslims’ and ‘third-world migrants’.
Memes depict Amelia waving Union Jacks, deporting migrants in ICE gear, confronting political leaders such as Keir Starmer, and embracing British icons such as Paddington Bear while hurling slurs. Many of these memes sexualise Amelia, portraying her in minidresses or as a ‘freedom fighter’ against perceived threats. These memes have amassed millions of views, with even figures like Tommy Robinson and Elon Musk engaging with them.
Experts have noted that her design — a white, attractive teenage rebel — fits the aesthetics of far-right memes, thereby subverting the game’s intent and sparking crypto scams such as “Amelia” tokens. Amid backlash, the game’s website reportedly faced access issues, highlighting AI’s role in amplifying extremism.
For me, this just shows how bad the situation has become with social media. It might be one of the indications of the end of Western society.
1 Like
No, it’s the BEGINNING of Western Society, without your Boomer bullshit clogging our Civilization.
Can’t wait for your generation to die off already. Most selfish dirty cunts who were ever born. You’ve left the world far, far worse than you inherited it.
Generation Y will be the ones who clean it up. And you better hope you won’t be around for it. Because it’s going to get very, very dirty, before it’s finally CLEANED.
Says someone who thinks that social ideas of solidarity are a problem and blames a generation for the ills of capitalism, despite the numerous people who have fought against it and suffered the consequences.
I think you’re now ready to admit that the Far Right are actually Nazis and that Nazism is actually a thirll kill cult and that you are down with all that.
By the way you’d be surprised how many females l’ve known who have been sexually abused by their own fathers INC, the Amy lookalike l mentioned above. I suspect Nazism is really just predicated on unleashing animal lusts for a bit before self destructing, laying low for 3 decades, then resurfacing.
No.
“Far-Right” would be the reassertion of Traditional Gender Roles and Marriage in Western Civilization. It would be reimposing a Central, Unified, Unquestioned Moral Authority and large degrees of social accountability. No more Marxist educators teaching children that men can be women, women can be men, husbands can be wives, wives can be husbands. That’s all gone.
Your delusions and lies, those of @Bob those of @Sr.Eba_Sted those of all other Leftwingers clogging up ILP forum… washed away with the ocean tides.
Right-ism is Truth-ism, always has been. Objectively True. Toward God, not away from God.
This is often called a “cult leader” or the central figure in a “cult of personality.” These terms describe a charismatic individual perceived as infallible, whose moral pronouncements demand unquestioning obedience from the group, enforcing conformity through loyalty and suppression of dissent.
This gives no room for seeing complex, unique individuals but only representatives of groups, no longer open to appropriately nuanced, but simple ‘I’m right, you’re wrong’ positions, and shouting more and more loudly.
‘The complex practice of medicine, vagaries of human diseases, unpredictability of pathologic conditions, and functions, dysfunctions, and responses of the human body cannot be defined, explained, or rigidly categorised by any written document … this text cannot replace physician judgement, cannot describe every possible aberration, nuance, clinical scenario, or presentation, and cannot define rigid standards for clinical actions or procedures. Every medical encounter must be individualised, and every patient must be approached on a case-by-case basis. No complex medical interaction can possibly be reduced to the written word.’
Rosen’s Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice, Walls, Hockberger & Gausche-Hill 2018
“Women can be men, men can be women, wives can be husbands, husbands can be wives!”
Yes yes, I know how retarded your ideology is. Everybody knows. Your Boomer Generation needs to retire and shut up already. Prepare your gravestones. Just know, that as soon as your Generation’s eyes close… we’re going to destroy ALL the “progress” you’ve been working for.
It’s all gone.
@RealUn It’s perverted men in their forties and fifties who are driving and funding the ‘trans’ bullshit, and whatever the fuck ‘gen’ people in their teens and twenties are, are lapping it up. They are the ones attacking women at women’s rights events. They are the ones telling lesbians they should accept perverted men who claim that they have a female ‘gendersoul’, and that rejecting them makes them ‘transphobic’ (the stupidest ‘word’ that stupid people have managed to come up with to date).
So it’s YOUR ‘gen’ (whatever that is) driving it, and YOUR sex.
Stop lumping women’s rights concerning men in womanface in with your religious crap. It’s not helpful. Men like Matt Walsh don’t give a shit about women. They are pushing their conservative relgious agenda. We don’t want them in this. They are more of a hindrance than a help.
This is Ed Gein/Buffalo Bill level scary for women, and these creeps are getting increasingly emboldened to go out in public. Imagine a woman alone in a restroom and one of these things walks in.
2 Likes
1 Like
You can believe these things without needing political change, you can keep faith and state separate.
As for my views vs. yours:
- Traditional gender roles: I believe that too
- Marriage instead of profaning the mystery: I believe that too. Obviously it’s nigh impossible to marry as soon as sexually mature in the UK and probably USA too I think the USA permits couples to marry young if the parents permit it in some states though? Warped sexual drive is the root of most psychopathology. Once that part of a person is warped, i think it’s hard to fix (neurosis). I can see why faith groups would want autonomy for this reason more than anything. These youths carrying machetes and making idiotic gang signs, wouldn’t exist if they were married and had home ownership and knew a legit trade.
- Gender identiy: I think the bit abot warped sexuality covers that, but anyway, l think you can be religous in a secular society and avoid all that
So, l’m religous and not right wing. You cannot attribute your political views to the Founding Fathers or religions.
The right wing / left wing thing is a lower level than religion, religion overarches politics.
You are right wing becaue you’ve been convinced by a speaker. So that’s my point: These speakers, via dogwhistle, are talking to your base desires: materialism. Where sexual pleasure is the greatest Good. Then there’s money, food, They are playing to these things via innuendoes or more blatantly. Beware! I explain here why Right Wing cannot do philosophy. By implication, it cannot even do religion. Right Wing will only give a materialistic despot, tyranny.
You utter dog 
Read up on marxism for goodness sake (I am NOT a marxist and reject communism and even marxist socialism BY THE WAY.. I AM A CAPITALIST)
There is nothing in karl marx’ writings about transgenders WHATSOEVER 
What the hell are you on about..? So random and weird
I doubt you could even define leftism
JESUS WOULD NEVER BE RIGHT WING
HE WEPT FOR THOSE SUFFERING
HE HEALED THE SICK
HE FED THE POOR
YOU LET THEM SUFFER
YOU SAY HEAL YOURSELF
YOU SAY FEED YOURSELF
How is this truth-ism when the facts arent straight and the lies are RAMPANT ?
That is very disturbing. And you’re right, it’s not too far a stretch from that to Clarice getting involved..
The right/left distinction is not adequate for today, even less for Jesus’ days.
On second thought, lets drop “moral authority” and lets do moral math instead..
I wonder:
What do you propose to do with the transgendered population?
Transgenders have been around for quite some time! Records of them go back 2,3,4000 years..! They WILL emerge even if you ‘ban’ them..
What will you do then to the transgendered individual? Jail them? Fine them? imprisonment? Therapy (doesnt work and hmm i thought you people were against free healthcare)?
What is the base suspicion of transgender to be allowed for questioning? Appearing more masculine/feminine than usual? How do we measure it? How do we seperate ‘men who like pink’ from transgender?
How will we pay for the anti transgender police and anti transgender training and law reforms? Are you indirectly suggesting a surveillance state?
Let me know! Im genuinely wondering
1 Like
Indeed. And Scotland is one of the worst places for this. A tiny group of very brave Scottish women managed to get an SNP bill vetoed that would have given creeps like that access to all women’s spaces with there being nothing any woman could do about it (apart from get arrested for objecting). The supreme court found that the bill violated women’s rights, essentially making them void. All it did was clarify what a human female is. Now all the ‘trans’ are screaming and howling, saying it takes away THEIR rights. When asked what ‘rights’ were being taken away from them they have never, to date, given an answer to that.
1 Like
id disagree purely on the basis of the ideologies that land left/right
or moreso values*
Yes, the SNP are often out of line trying to placate those types of people, no doubt about it. I sometimes don’t understand their agenda at all, because most Scottish people I know are opposed to normalising that kind of stuff.
I still vote for them though, cause I want independence 
If people keep the SNP’s feet to the fire then hopefully they will drop all their crazy ideas and policies..
Umm, no. Cross-dressers have been around for a long time. Perverts have been around for a long time. What do you mean ‘do’ with them? Cross-dressers can wear what they like. Who’s stopping them? Never in human history has anyone EVER said that a person can change sex, and that men can literally be women. Don’t you realise the harm that is doing to women? It makes even the word ‘woman’ meaningless, and that has enormous social implications that go on and on. From medical, to safety, to statistics. Rapists are being reported in the media as women. ‘‘This WOMAN… was raping women with HER penis’’ (and that’s NOT an exaggeration). It’s skewing statistics and these thugs are ending up in women’s prisons. Do you think that’s OK? What would YOU do with them? Put them in a fucking men’s prison, that’s what, and stop showing their disgusting crimes as women’s crimes!
I do hope you don’t have the nerve to call yourself a feminist.
2 Likes