I don’t care. I’m not interested in ‘understanding’ your crap or how ‘low’ you think my IQ is. That seems to be a running theme on this site. ‘‘Waah, you’ve got a low IQ ROFLMAO’’ which apparently passes as ‘winnning’ an argument 
Very witty.
2 Likes
.
..I neither said nor suggested no such thing. 
It was mentioned that the lower the IQ the more argumentative those types tend to be.
.
That says it all, really..
1 Like
If that video is truly based on you, then you seem to have collected a great deal of ire from Snoop Doggy Dog. Would you say that you have done anything to justifiably earn that response? Or why would such a video be made by a major celebrity?
1 Like
.
It isn’t based entirely on me. The title does reference my name, however.
The original track “Lavender” was remixed with a feature by Snoop Dogg. Snoop Dogg’s lyrics address the waves of police brutality in America at the time:
“Snoop Dogg samples BadBadNotGood and Kaytranada on new anti-police brutality song” 10.20.2016
https://www.factmag.com/2016/10/20/snoop-dogg-samples-badbadnotgood-kaytranada-new-song/
“Listen To A Snippet Of A New Snoop Dogg Song Which Samples Kaytranada And BADBADNOTGOOD’s ‘Lavender’
Snoop seems to address recent killings by police officers on the upcoming track” 10.19.2016
https://www.thefader.com/2016/10/19/snoop-dogg-kaytranada-badbadnotgood-snippet
I fit into the equation because I was arrested in 2015 after the 2014 killing of a local citizen by police. The events are detailed here:
Additional links/sources:
Those events, followed by my efforts in response, happened to coincide with the massive wave of police brutality in America at the time. It created such a stir that it caught the attention of certain people and that was the result.
The reason I am ridiculed, depicted as a clown in the video, is multilayered. First due to the nature of my arrest. I had been signaling officers the middle finger for months, on sight nearly each time, after the killing of our local citizen. They finally accosted me for speeding. I was ultimately arrested for disorderly conduct. Additional details are found in the text referenced above.
Second involves my history in music production. When producing as a hip hop duo (2009-2012) my partner and I gained industry attention through his success in hip hop battles. He participated in tournaments and, being very talented, advanced several rounds.
However we were deeply anti-establishment and that included prominent mainstream artists. In our music we often disparaged and insulted mainstream artists as tentacles of the ravaging corporate greed machine. They didn’t enjoy that. The video confirms this.
Major celebrities and artists are political assets. This is observed when artists like Cardi B and Eminem endorse Presidential candidates. They also address events and efforts like these.
The video and hip hop track are a multifaceted response to those events and efforts.
So is Snoop Doggy Dog saying that you are/were like other celebrities who are “political assets”? Or what does the clown face on the guy in the car (who is supposedly loosely based on your character) mean? Does it mean you are a “clown” or under that influence?
.
Interesting questions, Gary.
It isn’t a great idea to make this about any specific person or group. That’s the point here, to open up conversation about the issues as human beings.
The point is, these events would not occur if our society really cared. If people really looked after each other, as citizens, as human beings, we wouldn’t end up in these situations.
Don’t let the art overshadow the message. We can argue capitalism, we can argue socialism, we can argue communism. We can argue individualism, we can argue collectivism.
At the end of the day what really matters is how we treat each other. How we live our lives. With respect, with dignity, with care. That’s what matters. That’s the real issue.
We don’t really need to look at the people. We need to examine the greed, the corruption, the cheating, the duplicity, the character of the people and the systems.
First we must communicate, we must realize this. Then we can readily act to address these issues.
1 Like
Just curious as the video in question seems to be very much focused on the person or group. But you make a fair point.
And if some human beings want dictatorial power, fascism, torture, racial or ethnic discrimination, or some other social abomination, then what? Can we “argue” those things with someone who wants them? What if a significant portion of society seems to want those things? What if the President of our country seems to have few socio-political inhibitions and will pursue some of those things as a means to an end? Can we “argue” those things with him? Can we “argue” those things with the socio-pathological? Or is there no such thing as a socio-pathological belief or desire? Are all beliefs or desires “fair game” for discussion?
.
Most of your concerns fall under the umbrella of care.
Moreover many of the sentiments you express are rather vague. Could you perhaps clarify? Are there specific examples you would like to address?
Many of the things you mention are improving or are being improved.
Communication and understanding, as allowed by the internet and emerging technologies, can facilitate further improvement. But it takes effort.
Most use the internet for mere entertainment, amusement, consumerism. That is disappointing. The internet should be used as a tool to improve our communities and our world through expanded communication and dialogue. That is the responsibility of the people.
I’ve encountered people on the Internet who have expressed belief in dictatorship based on ethnic identity, people who have defended the torture at Guantanamo Bay, people who will readily rationalize police shootings that have moved minorities to protest brutality. And since the inception of Donald Trump as president, those beliefs seem to have come more to the forefront and seem to be expressed more openly by more people.
Trump is threatening Denmark, NATO, Iran, Venezuela. Trump himself has demonstrated the uninhibited desire for vengeance against political enemies and has acted on that desire. It seems to me that we as a nation have taken some steps backward lately. Am I interpreting things incorrectly?
.
Imagine supporting global immigrant crime gangs, but not the victims?
Where the drugs are, sex-trafficking/sexual-violence follows, or isn’t far behind.. the lowest and the highest echelons of society witness this, everyone else is too busy make their £s to make ends meet. 
Nope he is not a normie. Think he is 45 year old virgin or something, dont quote me though.
I’m a 58 year old, one time non-virgin who lives with his mother. Unfortunately, no. Not “normal”, at least not as far as most Americans are concerned.
Even once makes you not a virgin. Futureone is a virgin.
I have noticed this too. For what it’s worth.
3 Likes
As usual wrong again. You seem to be wrong about everything, it is a struggle to even find posts when you are correct about something.
1 Like
This may be entered into the record. My first official sexy time was my perpetration of a statutory rape on friday the 13th, April, 1990, San Jose CA, standing up in the shower. I was 15 and she, 14. We had just left the pool and my moms was at the grocery store so we took a shower together. It was magical, you guys.
I contacted her after getting out of prison in 2014. She had a terrible boating accident that fucked her head all up and gave her permanent focus, balance, concentration, etc., issues. She was still hot. The rich athletic CA suburban spandex housewife mother. Had a teenage daughter who wasn’t hot. This must mean she married some ugly guy goddamit. Never talked to her, though (this was emails).
No one asked 
fhsjkh
1 Like
‘Interesting’. You keep liking them Have any examples of me being ‘wrong’, with evidence? Have you even read ANY of futureone’s comments?
“Palestine is not a place”.
Case closed.