Once again DanielJ is allowed to bully me and Mags endlessly with no threat of permaban from the apathetic authority figures around here.
EDIT:
Its clear you are biased against me.
Daniel J has nothing but harass and provoke me and Mags continually, and instead of punishing him, you sandbox MY threads, because HE brought drama into the threads and ruins the threads.
All the while he mocks my contributions to philosophy and views himself as some kind of elitist, when he purposefully brings Reality TV drama to my threads, which you punish ME for by sandboxing my threads.
- And then you accuse me of “crossing the line” and giving an “example” of my bad conduct as, saying that a toxic person who is bullying me, who can’t debate fairly or civilized, is exhibiting “feral behavoir”… Is she not exhibiting feral behavoir? Is her philosophy on par with anyone else here? No of course not, she isn’t even in the same league as Daniel J…
- Next example you give is “her”, when its clear she is a woman that identifies as a man, but hates transfolk, she even labelled herself as “Mr.”, but its bad conduct to put her in quotes?even though she was bullying me non-stop and saying toxic things…?
- Its against the rules to call a terf a terf? Wtf. Have you seen all of the transphobic shit she says?
- Its against the rules to call someone delusional? Why should this be? In philosophy don’t you need to call out delusions? Isn’t philosophy about truth? If someone is misrepresenting or slandering an argument, they are being delusional, its as simple as that.
And how does MagsJ calling reasonvemotin a “child” make that a warn/ban worthy offensive? Its not even comparable to Daniel J or Victor’s constant bullying. While I hate reasonvemotion myself, as a mod I haven’t found anything of hers to be ban/warn worthy, nor anything MagsJ has been ban/warn worthy.
Also he posted something from 4chan in order to express what was expressed on 4chan. He is responsible for it. (Post in question is here)
no he is not responsible for something someone else says.
If i post a video that is mostly good, but the video creator says something politically incorrect, i should not be held accountable for that, i am not going to take the time and sanitize or edit the video for that. It is the video creators full responsibility for that. And the alternative you suggest is, not posting the video, which is an unreasonable alternative.
Does anyone disagree that speaking to others this way is bad and disruptive? Which ones and why?
Does anyone disagree that there should be less of this kind of think on ILP?
Does everyone want these kind of things to be deleted and/or users posting them warned/banned?
Because its not just a one off insult, but they follow me around and derail threads and turn the place into drama reality TV circus.