Ecmandu
February 28, 2021, 4:31pm
21
You didn’t quote my whole post. I told you the absolute truth. You still want to sleepwalk. Gnostic Christianity ?!?! Who gives a fuck? Seriously dude.
It’s not a thing. It’s not real life.
God is defined a the great consent violator if god exists in the ultimate creator sense. Why? Because in some way, shape or form, every being in existence is having their consent violated.
Existence doesn’t have to be that way. Existence doesn’t require duality to exist, it only requires otherness to exist.
Your understanding of existence is that of a child who makes up shit about why everything is perfect as it is.
iambiguous
February 28, 2021, 9:05pm
22
iambiguous:
I have my own O.P. on my own thread for that: ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop … 5&t=186929
And you’re invited.
In other words, you yourself either believe in a God, the God – or in a No God religious path like Buddhism – or you don’t. And, if you do, then you will almost certainly be connecting the dots [in your head and in the behaviors you choose] between morality here and now and immortality there and then. And, for some, relating that to the world we live in. Given the fate of all the animals – dumb or otherwise.
I am a Gnostic Christian.
I will take morality and death before I take the immorality of the mainstream religions by adopting their satanic theology.
There and then is a fantasy for the gullible. There is only here and now.
Regards
Another classic example of someone completely avoiding the discussion that I wish to pursue in regard to God and religion. Basically, from my frame of mind, you are just another Ierrellus here. Someone intent [consciously or not] on doing everything he possibly can to avoid taking his own comforting and consoling “spiritual path” into the deep end of the philosophical/theological pool:
I inevitably turn discussions of God and religion into exchanges regarding the actual behaviors that people choose on this side of the grave given that which they believe or would like the fate of “I” to be on the other side of the grave.
Or to discussions of theodicy.
Or the efforts of those who do believe in a God or a No God religious path to at least make an attempt to demonstrate to us how they demonstrate to themselves that what they believe “in their head” can be demonstrated to in fact be true. Especially given that there are hundreds and hundreds of conflicting paths out there…and with so much at stake.
Finally, discussions that revolve around the chief component of own philosophy here: the role that dasein plays in forming individual points of view about God and religion.
Still, if you ever do change your mind, let’s go there.
Ecmandu:
You didn’t quote my whole post. I told you the absolute truth. You still want to sleepwalk. Gnostic Christianity ?!?! Who gives a fuck? Seriously dude.
It’s not a thing. It’s not real life.
God is defined a the great consent violator if god exists in the ultimate creator sense. Why? Because in some way, shape or form, every being in existence is having their consent violated.
Existence doesn’t have to be that way. Existence doesn’t require duality to exist, it only requires otherness to exist.
Your understanding of existence is that of a child who makes up shit about why everything is perfect as it is.
If you do not recognize the duality of reality, take your personal shit and shove it up where your brain is, from the rear.
Regards
iambiguous:
iambiguous:
I have my own O.P. on my own thread for that: ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop … 5&t=186929
And you’re invited.
In other words, you yourself either believe in a God, the God – or in a No God religious path like Buddhism – or you don’t. And, if you do, then you will almost certainly be connecting the dots [in your head and in the behaviors you choose] between morality here and now and immortality there and then. And, for some, relating that to the world we live in. Given the fate of all the animals – dumb or otherwise.
I am a Gnostic Christian.
I will take morality and death before I take the immorality of the mainstream religions by adopting their satanic theology.
There and then is a fantasy for the gullible. There is only here and now.
Regards
Another classic example of someone completely avoiding the discussion that I wish to pursue in regard to God and religion. Basically, from my frame of mind, you are just another Ierrellus here. Someone intent [consciously or not] on doing everything he possibly can to avoid taking his own comforting and consoling “spiritual path” into the deep end of the philosophical/theological pool:
I inevitably turn discussions of God and religion into exchanges regarding the actual behaviors that people choose on this side of the grave given that which they believe or would like the fate of “I” to be on the other side of the grave.
Or to discussions of theodicy.
Or the efforts of those who do believe in a God or a No God religious path to at least make an attempt to demonstrate to us how they demonstrate to themselves that what they believe “in their head” can be demonstrated to in fact be true. Especially given that there are hundreds and hundreds of conflicting paths out there…and with so much at stake.
Finally, discussions that revolve around the chief component of own philosophy here: the role that dasein plays in forming individual points of view about God and religion.
Still, if you ever do change your mind, let’s go there.
I do not care what idiocy causes someone to believe in the supernatural and few even choose their religion let alone know why they do. It is all about tribalism and they will deny it.
My focus is more to the harm religions do.
Regards
Ecmandu
February 28, 2021, 10:40pm
25
Everyone in existence having their consent violated is not dualism, it’s monism.
I’ll hurl insults to try to wake people up a little more…
Words like fuck are actually great words to get a point across… I don’t think you use insults with better intentions. I really think you’re scared that Christian Gnosticism is meaningless.
The correct view of existence scares you.
It scares me too. But not like it does you. You’re still in your shell, terrified to come out of it.
iambiguous
February 28, 2021, 10:41pm
26
I do not care what idiocy causes someone to believe in the supernatural and few even choose their religion let alone know why they do. It is all about tribalism and they will deny it.
My focus is more to the harm religions do.
Regards
Nope, nothing new here.
If you Google “Gnostic Christian” [which is what he claims to be] you get this:
google.com/search?source=hp … gle+Search
Now those who call themselves Gnostic Christians either do or do not, will or will not, can or cannot go here…
I inevitably turn discussions of God and religion into exchanges regarding the actual behaviors that people choose on this side of the grave given that which they believe or would like the fate of “I” to be on the other side of the grave.
Or to discussions of theodicy.
Or the efforts of those who do believe in a God or a No God religious path to at least make an attempt to demonstrate to us how they demonstrate to themselves that what they believe “in their head” can be demonstrated to in fact be true. Especially given that there are hundreds and hundreds of conflicting paths out there…and with so much at stake.
Finally, discussions that revolve around the chief component of own philosophy here: the role that dasein plays in forming individual points of view about God and religion.
…with their beliefs.
All I can do is to provide them with the opportunity to explore this with me in more detail.
Ecmandu:
Everyone in existence having their consent violated is not dualism, it’s monism.
I’ll hurl insults to try to wake people up a little more…
Words like fuck are actually great words to get a point across… I don’t think you use insults with better intentions. I really think you’re scared that Christian Gnosticism is meaningless.
The correct view of existence scares you.
It scares me too. But not like it does you. You’re still in your shell, terrified to come out of it.
You are correct in that dualism has nothing to do with your consent.
How do you figure consent is being violated? Who is doing that to believers if not themselves?
As to your psychobabble, fuck you and your stupidity for thinking it worthy. Did that fuck help you understand?
Regards
Ecmandu
February 28, 2021, 11:41pm
28
Ecmandu:
Everyone in existence having their consent violated is not dualism, it’s monism.
I’ll hurl insults to try to wake people up a little more…
Words like fuck are actually great words to get a point across… I don’t think you use insults with better intentions. I really think you’re scared that Christian Gnosticism is meaningless.
The correct view of existence scares you.
It scares me too. But not like it does you. You’re still in your shell, terrified to come out of it.
You are correct in that dualism has nothing to do with your consent.
How do you figure consent is being violated? Who is doing that to believers if not themselves?
As to your psychobabble, fuck you and your stupidity for thinking it worthy. Did that fuck help you understand?
Regards
Everyone’s consent is being violated. That has everything to do with everything. That’s monolithic.
It’s not like there’s a dualistic person out there who isn’t having their consent violated. It’s not occurring in existence for the most important variable.
Ecmandu:
Ecmandu:
Everyone in existence having their consent violated is not dualism, it’s monism.
I’ll hurl insults to try to wake people up a little more…
Words like fuck are actually great words to get a point across… I don’t think you use insults with better intentions. I really think you’re scared that Christian Gnosticism is meaningless.
The correct view of existence scares you.
It scares me too. But not like it does you. You’re still in your shell, terrified to come out of it.
You are correct in that dualism has nothing to do with your consent.
How do you figure consent is being violated? Who is doing that to believers if not themselves?
As to your psychobabble, fuck you and your stupidity for thinking it worthy. Did that fuck help you understand?
Regards
Everyone’s consent is being violated. That has everything to do with everything. That’s monolithic.
It’s not like there’s a dualistic person out there who isn’t having their consent violated. It’s not occurring in existence for the most important variable.
IOW. You cannot explain yourself.
Repeating stupidity does not maker it smart.
Regards
Ecmandu
March 1, 2021, 3:23pm
30
Stop projecting your crap on me. I explained myself perfectly.
What YOU can’t explain is gnostic Christianity.
…Because it’s a mirage … when you actually walk there you realize it was a trick played on your senses.
Everyone in existence having their consent violated is REAL.
See? There’s a difference between mirage and real.
And see… what’s REAL is that there is no dualistic consent… it’s ONLY monolithic. And it’s the most despised thing in existence and everyone has it!
That’s the REAL reality!
Ecmandu:
Stop projecting your crap on me. I explained myself perfectly.
What YOU can’t explain is gnostic Christianity.
…Because it’s a mirage … when you actually walk there you realize it was a trick played on your senses.
Everyone in existence having their consent violated is REAL.
See? There’s a difference between mirage and real.
Your unqualified statement is garbage.
Done here, given that you will not show what you are stupidly repeating, without showing the violation or cause of it.
Regards
Ecmandu
March 1, 2021, 3:40pm
32
Ecmandu:
Stop projecting your crap on me. I explained myself perfectly.
What YOU can’t explain is gnostic Christianity.
…Because it’s a mirage … when you actually walk there you realize it was a trick played on your senses.
Everyone in existence having their consent violated is REAL.
See? There’s a difference between mirage and real.
Your unqualified statement is garbage.
Done here, given that you will not show what you are stupidly repeating, without showing the violation or cause of it.
Regards
I edited my post…
ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop … 0#p2808190
Consent violation is self evident. Everyone knows when it’s being violated. How about my example then:
MY consent is ALWAYS violated if ANY being in existence is having their consent violated — ANY being!
You must be one of those psychopaths who think heaven is rational when others are in hell. Or that hell is rational. Neither are rational…
Thanks for this. Go away, stupid.
Regards
Ecmandu
March 1, 2021, 4:44pm
34
And now everyone on these boards knows you’re a troll. I didn’t know that until this thread. Maybe I was behind the curve, who knows?
I edited this post as well to make it precision articulate.
ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop … 2#p2808192
You lost the debate of your OP here, and you lost the debate of gnostic Christianity …
I can understand why you are fuming. You put all your eggs in one basket… and that basket fell and broke them all
Thanks for this. Go away, stupid.
Regards