Is not using an anonymous platform to talk to anonymous people not disrespectful towards oneself? The more I think about it, the more I think it is true. Some autistic pencil-neck kook comes and talks shit in your face in real life and tries to embarrass you in-front of public, you just slap him in the face…some kook spreads gossip and smears about you publicly, you knock at his house very soon…but here…on the internet…everything is blurred…some shithead comes talking to you whilst laying in front of his filthy room, 100lbs obese and high out of his mind and you, assuming you have somebody normal in-front of you, waste your time taking him seriously…
The Indian knew how to live without wants, to suffer without complaint, and to die singing.
Alexis de Tocqueville
youtube.com/watch?v=i0u0zjr … Cash-Topic
great song which reminded me of this quote by the great Tocqueville, the Indians really died singing, the 1960s masquerade with clowns like Brandon and the lefties bringing them into a supposed centre is artificial and false. The Indian is dead because his land is dead and his way of life is dead.
I remember discussing euthanasia with my mother who worked at a hospital her whole life and her telling me about a patient with a liver cancer who was constantly shitting himself(because of the damage to his liver) and(because of the acid) rotting alive because even though they washed him constantly, the acid in the shit still wrecked the skin it touched…and there was nothing they could do…my mother is more Nietzschean than all the college, pencil-neck autistic kooks put together, as is the hospital staff in general.
Appreciate your life, think of good and do good.
You want more masculine conflict? like what? should we take knives, clubs, swords, sticks, fists to a park and have a go at it because we disagree over politics? are you people fucking insane or what???
youtube.com/watch?v=X3EtGZO … travagante
beauty…it has the capacity to inspire and uplift when you find what speaks to your own soul and it is truly beautiful. true beauty and a true aesthetic experience is ruthless, intolerant, discriminant…it flashes out the ugly, the sick, the twisted and perverted and lowly in yourself and others in your life immediately and serves it up to you on a plate to eat…it takes up space in your mind and in your soul and asks you why you are cutting its place to expand for thrash… some day, you will experience your last morning and your last sun-set and will fall asleep the last time, as we all do…remember, that each thing you do, you did for eternity to come.
What is the modern Yanks soul made of? superstition, Freudianism, Scientism and anarchy. You immediately know when you are speaking to somebody washed in Freudianism because they speak as if they know their or yours soul and have worked out all there is to do with brains, or somebody who is superstitious and hence immediately passive-aggressive or is a believer in scientism and hence arrogant and a fanatical materialist by his own logic or its lack.
youtube.com/watch?v=kzNpD9D … oseNetwork
great mind, mentions Comte as an inventor of this thinking, who is a father of Communism, not Marx, as all experts on the internet falsely believe because they are thick.
Anarchism is wanting to destroy before you already build something new to take the place of the destroyed without even more destruction.
The ugly and unattractive nerds are simply jealous of those who they see are attractive to females. Its a simple and ugly jealously, nothing more; whatever the crackpot conspiracies they want to use to justify their jelousy. They see attractive females, they see their boobs and their asses, they see them and are mad that they cant get them…end of story.
youtube.com/watch?v=k7972uf … heim-Topic
Those neo-nazi crackpots who ridicule rap(rightfully) and listen to this kind of thing are just funny in their idiocy. This is as bad musically and just as based on evoking the primitive as rap is.
The neo-nazi crackpots make the connection between feminism, patriarchy and their general impression that because of feminism, females are free to choose and they deduce that this obviously means that without feminism, females would not be free to choose and so would not be free to choose to reject them, as they do currently, and they then assume this would mean they, as men, would, instead, be free to choose females…instead of the actual reality where arranged marriages happened SOME of the time and when they did, it was not the autistic Mexican who was calling the shots on which female he wanted but it was just as a selective proxy(or even more selective!) as that of the girls herself: her own parents and grandparents…the cunt SATIRE feeds them these delusions even further, with his crack-pot view on what the function of marriage was and how it meant that pussy was collectivized for men to choose(wrong) so that they could simply bang some ass for sure and could carry out with their more civilised activities(like spreading crackpot conspiracies and promoting antisemitism and racism on the internet to mentally handicapped, autistic virgins from USA)…its a funny and uncanny spectacle of misery, idiocy, retardation and jealousy. dont take advice from people who never managed to marry young, or at least marry young females, and instead fucked around unproductively and then scored some old, second-hand pussy…just a thought for you!
Lies as usual,I wont even bother…crackpot kooks live in their own world…history is re-written by the victors, yet, somehow, the kook is perfectly certain as to what the Ancient Greeks were and were not… 
the crackpot is so far gone, he is constantly contradicting himself and completely does not see it…
The collapse of marriage in America is not a question of ‘Americanism’(since it only collapsed in the 1960s and only in the working class and lower-middle and not exclusively in America and America existed for centuries) but a question of spoilt Yanks(United Kingdom, Canada, USA, Australia etc.) like the cunt SATIRE, washed in Freudianism, anti-Christianity and general hippie malaise, riding the wave of the cultural revolution started by Mao in Communist China(the 60s revolutions STARTED IN CHINA!!!) which spread globally, throwing marriage(and with it, its restrictions) into the thrash so that they could fuck around without any consequences beyond their teenage years…Who is this idiot trying to brain-wash? himself? when did this idiot get married and when did he have his child and how long did he last in it? is this the fault of collapse of marriage or the fault of people like him, commie hippies from the 1960s and 70s, who collapsed marriage by their own actions, hostility to institutions which sustained it(anti-Christianity and anarchism, anti-Americanism, anti-Greek, anti-nationalism, anti-patriotism) and their lack of participation in the marriage institution(like himself) and when finally deciding to marry, not taking it seriously at all and fucking off at a slightest whim(like he did, by his own words). IT WAS HIS FUCKING GENERATION, GROWING IN THE COUNTRIES IN WHICH HE GREW UP AND LIVED WHICH FUCKED MARRIAGE UP!!! And if you are a young guy growing in the countries which these hippie shits fucked up, and you buy this shit, you are a fucking lackey rat with shit for brain or so weak you are too afraid to think for yourself. A person who fucked something up badly in the society for you is not telling you its not their fault at all!!!They are actually the ones trying to help you!!!HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH
What was Americas mistake in the first place? letting immigrants from broken and non-existent countries enter its Republic and reproduce, inevitably leading to them bringing their resigned or pretentious and shallow cultural spirit of a fleeing immigrant and their resentment towards the superior country and culture that comes with it with them.
The Nazi and the commie hate each-other more than they hate anybody else because both see in each-other a heretic of one faith they belong to…they are two churches of the same religion that view each-other as heretics; that EARTHLY utopian futures are possible by centralisation of power and authority, limitation of personal freedom and a zealot-like, servile belief in their leader and his omnipotence which will carry their chosen people, picked up on a religious-like basis, to a chosen and golden future.
Damn bruh u actually think Marxism and Nazism are theoretically identical?
Holy history books, bat-man.
Of course they are. Communism and National SOCIALISM are like a glove in a mirror, left hand is a right hand and a right hand is a left hand. Thats why they attract the similar type of a bizarre, reject kook audience, thats why their rise is uncannily similar social conditions and relying on uncannily similar opportunism and so on…the cult of the leader who will lead the the chosen to the material utopia…the attack on the youth, education, free-speech…Hitler was just much of a religious, pagan idol as Stalin was.
Goebbels himself:
Read Road to Serfdom(doubt you will understand much, but nevertheless) or watch this: youtube.com/watch?v=eCkyWBP … hannel=TIK
and follow the sources he cites(which you will fail to understand also).
And also…politics have no ‘theory’…Marixsm is not Marxism-Leninism…one is an intellectual theory, the latter is a political dogma and a political system. Here, Communism towers over Nazism actually because National Socialists rely exclusively on vulgar pseudo-science, mysticism and superstition, whilst Marxism always was and still is a formidable intellectual theory(though it had elements of pseudoscience). Mussolini and his fascism was much more advanced and could definitely work but it burned with its ally.
The Nazis were SINOs; socialists in name only, and the fascist structure of the state and government was nothing like that of the short lived October revolution… which is as close to a textbook Marxist temporary state as u gonna get. In fact, u really have nothing to compare the Nazis to because a genuine Marxist state has never existed on planet erf.
The Nazis needed a populist approach to gain the favor and support of the German working class. It was all a form of rallying propaganda.
Not to say that Hitler didn’t love his volk. Of course he did, but he and his generals never had the intentions of turning state control over to the German working class, or of letting the supreme draconian state ‘wither away’. Nazism was corporatism more or less, and there are very few elements shared by both corporatism and Marxism, leninism and Trotskyism.
It was a tremendous facade but for a brilliant reason. To unite Germany against perceived enemies that cheated them after ww1. And unite they did… like overnight… them niggas built a fifty-piece of tanks, and the world probably hasn’t seen since an economy skyrocket out of a depression like the volk did. The German people of that period were admirable, although the Nazi party would end up being the worst thing to ever happen to them. It wasn’t the Germans fault… it was Hitler and his band of bungling idiot mystics and paranoid delusional pseudo-scientific numbskulls.
Still nothing that happened in Germany during ww2 was even remotely like what happened in Russia during its civil war, or how the Bolshevik army/government was structured during its brief life.