Stupidity seems to be spreading. The very idea that there could be unequality is of course impossible, despite historical evidence.
How many genders are there, Bobby-Boy?
Tip: if you answer “only 2”, then you do realize you’re not being very “socially equitable”, correct??
1 Like
An idea is an expressed call to action. An ideology is a set of logically connected ideas.**
From this, idiocy naturally follows — because any isolated act of choice that ignores the wholeness of a worldview is, in fact, idiocy.
I don’t care, they’re all human beings.
It really takes some ignorance to ignore the suffering caused by supposed elites, and the robbery of agency that rendered people dependent.
If only the educated idiots understood that they were idiots.
But idiocy itself excludes understanding — let alone any awareness of one’s own limitations.
And who would remain in science if we excluded the idiots who cling to and feed off dogmas invented by pathetic authorities?
It’s funny that in Classical Greece, particularly in Athens, an idiōtēs was simply a private citizen, and someone not involved in public affairs or civic life. The word wasn’t an insult—it just meant someone who focused on personal or domestic matters rather than contributing to the political or communal sphere. In a democracy where civic engagement was prized, being an idiōtēs could imply a kind of social disengagement or irresponsibility, but not stupidity.
It was in Medieval Latin, idiota came to mean an uneducated or ignorant person, someone lacking professional knowledge. Eventually, in English and other European languages, the word slid into the meaning we know today, as a person of low intelligence or poor judgment. Perhaps, because of the importance of contributing to the political or communal sphere in a democracy, it could mean both, especially when used for people who do not participate and focus on personal or domestic matters instead.
That would be a kind of a poetic way to bring it full circle to its Athenian roots, don’t you think?
Isn’t it amusing that the Demon had already considered all the definitions of the word ‘idiot’? Want to laugh some more? Education is the forced imposition of false representations of reality. And if you realize that the process of education (learning) is funded by the authorities, you’ll come to an even more brilliant conclusion. Education is literally dumbing people down, turning them into stupid, mindless, herd-like, submissive cattle. So, how’s that? Funny
Yeah, that makes sense. Idiocy is defined by a lack of empathy and understanding of one’s society, or of any society for that matter: Anti-Social behavior.
Bobby-Boy, you claimed Stupidity is spreading, but you-yourself don’t know how many genders there are…
Are you sure you want to commit to that Outright Vicious Lie?
It was an insult, then, as it is now. You need Context, to properly understand Greeks and Hellenism.
Idiocy was/is “Autism”, back then. It’s an Anti-Social attitude, now very apparent by the American Left and Right-wing, which cannot tolerate one another. Consider how you-yourself, just committed to the Left’s Big Lie, that you don’t know how many genders there are. How fucking old are you, Bob? When you were 40, did you know then? How about when you were 20? Try to think back, long ago.
Even children know how many genders there are, despite being lied to by their Political Radical parents. Why? Because kids socialize with one-another while young. They listen to their friends and peers, not necessarily their family or parents.
Children are wiser than you, Bob…
Without encouraging your childish games, you might be referring to how many sexes there are, of which there are two. But I can understand that you might have difficulty distinguishing biological reality from the expression of personality.
Bob, One thing I have noted with these ‘‘young’’ one’s,
is there inability to comprehend that other viewpoints
do exists… take this notion of gender…
there are but two and only two genders, or so they
are constantly telling us, and yet, they make
no room or leave the possibility that people may
question or believe that they were born the wrong gender…
there is simply no option or possibility that people
may not be fulfilled or happy as one gender or another…
they want to buttonhole everyone into set boxes with
no possibilities of going outside of their boxes…
it is all very cut and dry with these young kids…
no thinking outside the box, no imagination about
the possibilities outside the box, a role is set and defined
forever and ever… with no possibility of change or adaptation…
in any of their thinking… when did the kids refuse to
change or adapt to new thinking?
Kropotkin
A modern person is identified by the presence of reason. For one who has descended to the level of beasts, their criteria are primitive. They are guided by gender, or, for example, faith, membership in a herd (pen, state, nation, race).
Alright… who unmuzzled the demon?
@PZR it was you, wasn’t it? Get your ass in here & fix this.
Angels are servants of God who maintain the order of existence. Demons are servants of the same God who create new, more perfect orders. It’s amusing to hear the screams of humans when the orders don’t suit them.
Well, from a metaphysical perspective, if you want to get technical about that question, then you need to look past the material body…
(something of which will be discarded at death)
…and focus on the human “soul.”
And in so doing, you should realize that the human soul has no gender (or sex, or whatever you want to call it).
In other words, with just a few minor edits in the DNA of our developing embryo while still in our mother’s womb, any one of us could have been born the opposite sex (gender) of what we are now, and we would have played our temporary roles accordingly.
Indeed, all of this unfortunate (and ridiculous) controversy over gender is all just part and parcel of our momentary existence in what we call “objective reality,” which - by systemic design - places our souls into bodies that, for the purpose of reproduction, have necessary differences.
And the point is that because the intrinsically “genderless/sexless” (and eternal) human soul finds itself temporarily occupying a material body that (setting aside any rare anomalies) has either male parts or female parts, denoting either one of two opposing genders (sexes) when, again, the soul has no sex or gender,…
…suggests that confusion can sometimes arise and overtake a soul’s assessment of its momentary role on earth…
“…Call me mam…”
https://youtu.be/7nstwvQFnv4
The soul is a matrix, a vessel that contains the experience of the lived life. Do you want to convince me that the female experience is no different from the male experience? The mechanism of the soul was needed by God because He reads thoughts telepathically, right at the moment of their emergence. He reads the electricity of neural connections. However, the information of feelings is only accessible after death, when the soul departs to God. If you are appealing to abstract concepts, you should know the definitions of these concepts
No, I want to convince you (though I doubt that that’s possible) that the soul,…
…which was permanently fixed and established when our “I Am-ness” (another name for the soul) was awakened into existence at the moment of our birth from our mother’s womb,…
…is neither male nor female, but a balanced (Yin/Yang-like) blend of those two aspects of our inner being.
In other words, the human soul – at its core – represents a “genderless, wholeness of being” – as is God’s Soul.
The human soul is not a “mechanism,” no, it is a natural and organic, “familial” replication of God’s Soul.
“He”???
What makes you assume that God is a “He”?
It is clear (to me, anyway) that we use such gender specific pronouns because we have no good name for a “genderless/sexless” Entity that we generally refer to as "God.’
Therefore, it is out of necessity, or perhaps habit,…
(and because the word “IT” seems inappropriate)
…we default to words such as “God,” or “He.”
And whose “definitions” might those be?
Prove to me or at least demonstrate that the soul is not also gendered somehow. That males do not have male-like souls and females have female-like souls.
I have heard of sexual intercourse occurring in the astral realm, between souls. Likewise, I see no reason to reduce the immaterial soul to such an anti-physical manifestation. If the physical emerges as a result of the immaterial, placing metaphysically the soul as primary over the body, then why would the soul not be part of the reason for sexed divisions in the body?
To dwell in deceptive, blissful abstractions is one thing, but to understand the facts of reality is another. The matrix (soul) is sexless until the moment of obtaining a body with traits of either a man or a woman. God does not have His own soul. God is a cannibal and feeds on human souls. First, He salts the souls with our tears and seasons them with sorrow. Then He kills people and enjoys the feast. I give you definitions. The definition of the Demon, who is quite familiar with the cannibal god, unlike you, who believes in fantasies about an invented idol.