If you offered me all my dreams to come true forever or oblivion, I’d choose oblivion.
Armageddon is the war between those who want to violate consent vs. those who don’t want to violate consent.
It’s a horrible war.
Most people feel proud of their relationships at the exclusion of others. They’re on the consent violating side of the war. That’s almost everyone on earth.
Who do you think is going to win the war if almost everyone is on the wrong side?
Responding to this video: youtu.be/sH6vXYmLVIA?feature=shared
Not even God can grant that wish more than he already does. Also, if sex is like your apartment, or anything else you want that not everyone can have or do, why do you have or do anything? Because loving others and self means you don’t wait until everyone has what you want (whether or not they want it) — though, you might wait for other reasons — because if it is true not everyone can have/do it, you ruin it for everyone who can (and wants to). That is okay for small things, like having seconds of dinner… but not for anything that is a need. We should want to see met (not necessarily through direct observation) as many people’s needs as possible.
In that video, you say you are 44, which … if it is true you are now 47 … was not 8 years ago (you or your hacker commented to your first video that it was 8 years ago … If you are 47, it was only 3 years ago. If it was 8 years ago … you’re 52. Or, perhaps you do not have a firm grasp on time? … in sum… If you are 47, then it wasn’t posted 8 years ago… Which means that if it was a hacker, they were being your wingman. And it was probably you!).
But anyway. Let’s say you’re right & the final war is between consent violators and consent respecters. Your consent structure ends where my consent structure begins, & vice versa. Obviously that is not my body or your body. The structure of spirit is the structure of consent.
sigh
swoon
@Ecmandu I respectfully request a response. And for you to restore the video in the second link, but I understand if you won’t.
self equals other is universal … or trans-omni-multi-meta-universal
& stuff like that
Also: Quality/Quantity (Carleas), or: Itchy takes down Ec & Bri Bri single-handedly
You have to sow seeds of peace. The only problem with that is, the war mongers will interpret it as a declaration of war against everything they value… everything that is passing away.
You call married people whores. Unfortunately, it is mostly true. Most the world are whores who do everything for something in return.
Imagine a scenario where that wasn’t the case, because it was arranged by the community who were good matchmakers, but both were blind consenters. The best of both worlds colliding in a good way.
Alas. Youth is wasted on the young.
When I look back on my life, I will wish I had a chance with this guy:
I wish you could teach me this stuff:
Please explain more about consent violation as relates to the “relationships at the exclusion of others”. What do you mean by this?
I pride myself on not violating the consent of others. I don’t force people to do or say or believe anything. But I do plainly speak the truth as I see it, and anyone is free to disagree or simply ignore it.
We exclude others when we don’t represent their worldview with a charitable take on their actual perspective.
Not that you were asking me. I put myself on ignore with respect to you.
And this stuff:
This particular spiral is not an idle curiosity or just an interesting pattern - It’s actually a harmonic sequence map. This is how music works - actually how everything works. This is a visual representation of musical intervals and their relationships, in the context of a harmonic or tuning system. The heart of the chart is the base note (C), with a doubling in frequency for each octave. Each interval is also associated with a specific mathematical ratio, first calculated by Pythagoras. He discovered that the two notes that make up an interval always have a ratio of 2 to 1. The ratio of a perfect fifth is 3 to 2, and a perfect fourth is 4 to 3. Pythagoras combined these intervals and then created other notes to form a major scale. With his mathematical calculations, music theory was born.
All frequencies including sound, light, planetary motion, etc. could be related to this cycle. The same spiral pattern appears everywhere in nature, DNA, plants, galaxies, our weather patterns… Likewise in music. The spiral is repetition, but with the accumulation of experience, it embodies the fundamental processes of creation and growth.
They’re the best kind of relationships…
.
You are either lying, or speaking from a place of resentment… which?
People don’t have a conscience.
I feel horrible when I get pleasurable exclusive access that hurts a persons feelings.
Couples feel great that they found each other.
They’re sociopaths
Bring on the ‘pleasurable exclusive access’… coz I ain’t a hoe, bro.
I’m not a hoe either.
You know what’s interesting about people here.
They never speak truth because they want very basic carnal things.
Truth eliminates and extinguishes the female sex drive.
In our species males have to trick women into sex with deception.
Even though I’m as horny as any male. I made the choice to teach true things to give up sex.
What happens if you meet a female whose sex drive is neither eliminated nor extinguished by truth?
You need a back up plan.
Also, I don’t think you’ve even tested your theory because I’m not sure anything you’ve said is true… except the rainbow (golden) rule… which you don’t really include in most of your reasoning.
You lie because lying works. That’s why you always feel horrible when you get laid. Maybe you should actually try the truth.
Most people have a conscience.
Keep lying.
What’s a conscience? People spend almost their entire lives hoarding conversation, nudity and sex while attempting to talk over a person’s head to feel superior
It feels like what you’re saying is “I’m doing things the right way, and it’s not working to get what I want, so why try the right way?”
If that’s not what you were saying, whatever you were saying went over my head.
The problem with your approach/way is that the right approach/way (method, if you will) isn’t motivated by getting what only you want, Rather, what you want should be the right way, and treat the person as an end and not as a way/means (that is not an end in itself).
This feels a tad “rough”… but only because I am new to it… slightly. Always.
reads what just came out of her… side-eyes ecmandu
I’m not just talking about pure logic. I don’t blame people to not use it as well as I do.
I’m talking about intuition. I have tons of it and most people don’t.
From my perspective it doesn’t make me superior.
When I took on the problem of creating mathematics to read minds at 14, when I solved it at 16, I thought I was the slow student. I assumed it was just a homework assignment, and I was retarded for taking 2 years to solve it.
