.
Why you still giving this person a platform?
Aren’t you also doing the same thing with that sort of reply?
I suppose I should thank you?
Update: Wow. @promethean75 went a whole day without giving me a platform. I guess we know who wears the pants in that family, eh @MagsJ?
Somewhat on topic. I was thinking randomly recently how in nature (which we are somehow in, although at a level the other animals are not, because the way we look at the world — when we look — sort of displaces us from going with the flow unless voluntarily… which is not exactly just going with the flow … so it is STILL a sort of … perhaps Sisyphean, for some … resistance) … in some species (how are we to know if we are that sort?) the females can have at least two (sometimes more) competitors (but only stick with one at a time… the winner), but the males can have entire groups of females they win or keep or lose in the competition. That is the popular narrative. But in other species, the females kill their mate when they are done with them. How are we to know if we are or are not that kind of species? And what if we are given reason so that we can prioritize reproduction (and other ways of interacting, sexually or not) that doesn’t have to end/begin in death or consent violation, or other (to some) unfortunate programs of that nature?
And if we arrive at certain conclusions we purposefully make a habit so that it becomes second nature, but it is clearly not something to which we are predisposed, is that anti-natural or supernatural or just natural because… reason is in our nature?
2 posts were split to a new topic: [SPLIT] ILP Musical Supergroup
Is that supposed to be some sort of divine request theory? Whatever happened to the rainbow rule that permits you to define your own objectives as long as they pivot (and thus capitalize/increase upon) the rainbow rule?
Our work here is never done, because that objective is impossible to reach, being infinite (and already everywherewhen present).
We can only demonstrate the objective (which is co-creativity) within our reference frame.
And the question is…How are we doing/demonstrating that?
I brought the why. You bring the how.
Also please see my last reply.