- No evidence of a “U.S.-China-global public ‘health’ conspiracy” will be disclosed by the Trump administration. (95%)
Eff ‘em if true.
China has this completely figured out, even as it has even be discussed percentile wise, I feel, not because any considerable hedge on technology, formally appointed/annoited but it as it may defer to it’s overall constitution, but appointed into a non cabinet role.
Some figured in social media, that narcissistic authority can not be comparatively promoted to a competitive role to someone who by accounting and paying in dollars and sense, can withstand such a pro forma dictum.
)(
Of course not .that would prematurely disillusion the poor boys in an untimely manner.
.
But it’s for certain a different procedure was followed behind closed doors?
)()()(
As a matter of representation , the trifefracture of leadership can be described as a triumvirate consisting of
1 Trump the pre former
2 Musk the accountant
3 Vance the configured
More. Likely than not.
Here’s another prediction. They hold everyone accountable that was on Epstein‘s jet and island.
Consider that swamp as good as drained, gentlemen.
sigh
Whatever.
walks away
Most of those on the list are already abroad, or hiding with one under some witness pritection scheme.
…not once they have the real ID mandatory everywhere.
You expect the Trump administration to initiate a prosecution of Donald Trump?
A few predictions close to home:
- The steel barriers that were erected around the White House during the previous Trump administration will be put up again during the next year. (80%)
- Active Duty military personnel will be deployed to Washington DC during Trump’s presidency. (80%)
- There will not be a parade of modern military hardware (e.g. tanks) past the White House. (80%)
- A DC resident will be killed by federal law enforcement or military during the next 4 years.(60%)
- Matt Gaetz will not be confirmed as Attorney General. (70%)
you meant “in the same vein”
No, I mean close to my literal home. Other than #30, those predictions are about my city. I live about a mile from the Capitol. I could hear J6 happening from my house, and in the days after it the playground where I took my kids was inaccessible because it was behind the expanded security perimeter.
Trump’s weird idolization of tin-pot dictators has consequences in my day-to-day life, when he militarizes the White House and tries to parade tanks through the streets. He was bad for DC last time, I expect him to be even worse for it this time – he’s been explicit about his desire to punish states that didn’t vote for him, and DC was 92.5% for Harris.
I would not want to live anywhere near a tourist spot related to U.S. history or power symbols… under the Biden or Harris White House. But, if I did live near them, I would hope they would let me do my usual stuff since I’m not a tourist. Thankfully, I don’t have to worry about such things.
…maybe you should move?
If Mr. Biden could start his presidency at the age of 78 , discussing age of Shri Donald J. Trump isn’t fair enough . The way he ducked bullets shows his fitness and agility.
2 Likes
LOL yeah, exactly.
Yes and a simulated auto impeachment follows by a necessary show of faith, for him to survive prosecution.
Prediction:
There will be a headline involving “James and the Giant Impeachment” (34%)
I’ve lived here during 4 administrations now (last two years of Bush, Obama 1, Trump 1, Biden). Obama changed the city a lot because his administration was young, so the people that moved here for him put their roots down, and that was a noticeable demographic shift.
Trump brought militarization. Even before Covid/George Floyd/J6, he erected barriers between the White House and the city, he closed Pennsylvania Ave. and Lafayette park (in front of the White House). The White House is surrounded by a tall fence, but he put another layer of fencing outside of that, and often used barriers that obstructed the view of the White House. During every administration, there are people protesting at the White House every day, and it was pretty clear that Trump couldn’t stand the sight of them. The Bush years had more military presence than Obama, but the Iraq war was still going on and 9/11 was still fresh. And he still didn’t lock down the neighborhood around the White House the way Trump did.
Biden removed all that immediately and returned the city to what I consider normal. The federal government is a big presence in the city, but for the most part it’s just monuments and office buildings and all the functionaries whose kids go to my kids’ school. Like plumbing, noticing it feels like something’s wrong.
Maybe. Miller is talking about sending red state national guards into blue states. I’m not sure what level of credence I give that, but if it happens it seems very likely that DC will come under some kind of martial law.
We talk about leaving DC. We also talk about leaving the US. I don’t think we’ll do either. (30%)
Yes but not intended a contentious show of defensive promotion.
There are opinions forming about the redundancy of the Musk promotion, as a shoe , a game that the economic context within which it’s constitution is framed is easily reversible , as a poker face can trump such perception easily, as if by a sleight of hand trick.
(1 to two 99 %)
Not reversible is the supposed cybernization of workers cause the only reason for it is human inefficiency, and if cyborgs could be built totally efficient with a lack of feelings no than human elimination would make sense, and this theory is suspect even to Trump himself.
I don’t know how much of that is true. I was trying to google for when that dude got through into the White House, but what I found was two separate incidents where vehicles crashed into the barriers. I’m not sure if they’re the same barriers you claim were removed, but the crashes happened in 2023 and 2024. You have twisted facts previously and I don’t know why you would do so in this instance. Since President Trump has actually survived assassination attempts, one can understand strong security measures. Honestly, I don’t even know why I’m in this discussion. (47%)
1 Like
I don’t twist facts, I rotate them to show you how they fit together.
I think you’re going to be disappointed by Trump’s second term. I’d make it a prediction but it’s not testable. I’ll be interested to hear your thoughts in 4 years.