I said that?
Where?
Crazy…that’s the voices in your head.
HaHa…it doesn’t matter what nonsense you claim anymore Silenus….you get embarrassed and shown to be wrong.
So…nothing…no quote.
You are listening to the voices again, Crazy.
+/-=+/- is the correct starting philosophy for the cosmos and not +=- and -=+ philosophy and the reason is you can’t cancel out attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force interactions NN,NS,SN,SS as mainstream cognitively biased +=- and -=+ philosophy science falsely claims Silenus.
You have been lied to.
You will never sort your psychosis out and those voices in your head with +=- and -=+ philosophy.
The specimen follows orders quite well.
This is your life
… are you fulfilling your function the way you want to?
A binary processing biological machine bot.can claim to be a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion).It can also claim to be a representation of reality (a non illusion).
Either way it doesn’t possess life.
It exists because it needs to exist to claim that it doesn’t exist and it doesn’t exist because it doesn’t possess life.
The right person to give this kind of advice!
How many times have I mentioned faith in this forum? 
This quick search turned up 22 results (not necessarily exhaustive)… under your username… since April.
https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/search?q=faith%20%40Maxx%20order%3Alatest
22 casual mentions of the term, fish girl, not necessarily addressing it as a topic.
God bless your heart, I appreciate you so much, Max.
When I say I have no faith, that’s exactly what I mean. No need for much interpretation. Faith is blind trust in a power beyond me, a power which is generally translated as God. But I have no such trust, and the word God makes no sense to me, so I am really faith-less and a-theistic, and in my worldview I can only create meaning by being such.
And are you satisfied with created meaning that is out of alignment with and in complete denial of true meaning? Is it truly worth living and dying for?
Does it bring you joy?
Does it fuel you when you have nothing left?
Does it even give you enough fuel to fuel others who have nothing left?
If yes, then why are you a bloody egoist, Max?
True meaning- meaning as a thing in itself- does not exist. Meaning is a simple word we use to represent a lot of things: purpose, significance, importance, goal, objective, etc. As such, the definition varies according to the one who employs the term.
In true Sartrian style, I understand that a man is responsible for finding purpose in his life. He can choose to be whatever he wants, or to simply not be, but even not being is a choice.
I know that to you the existentialist mindset is anathema. But it works for me, it makes a lot more sense than the idea that the meaning of existence is predetermined by God.
1 yes
2 yes
3 nope, others have their own lives to live
4 I was born like that
The kingdom of ends is made up of individuals… each of whom is an end (meaningful, valued, purposeful, significant) in itself (each being a source of value, because a value-giver)… and each of whom recognize each other as such, and freely acknowledge such recognition in their behavior towards each other, including the ordering of their values.
Market rate currency for your thoughts?
Speaking of meaning and value or getting what you want…
General will limits individual will, which limits general will.
Everyone getting what they want isn’t one undifferentiated person/mass getting what they want — it’s every/each person getting what they want — which implies its own limit. The only wants left standing are those that do not violate anyone else’s consent. That doesn’t mean that the only wants left standing are those that do no harm, because not all harm is wrongdoing or non-consensual, for example, when a doctor has to reset a broken leg.
You don’t think co-creativity is ontologically prior to (omniitemporospatially, immanently transcendent to) actually (existentially) creating? It’s more like co-predetermined if you insist on putting it in that language.
I need to exist to claim I don’t exist.You need to exist to claim you don’t exist.
We all have to exist in order to claim (in bad faith) we don’t exist, but that is not the meaning of existence, Jupyman.
There is no life in existence or non existence Ichthusyman.
A lifeless binary processing biological machine exists remember because it needs to exists to claim that it doesn’t exist.
Are you claiming that a lifeless binary processing biological machine has life then?
Surely not.
You need to balance existence and non existence out and move on philosophically.Don’t stagnate.
Existence/Non Existence=Existence/Non Existence
The binary processing biological machine doesn’t lie because what it means by non existence is lack of life.
It can only compute to the limits of its binary software programming.