Double-Edged Golden Rule (self=other)

Philosophy Forums Society, Government, and Economics
41

I think of the ground of being as transcending and being immanent in the entire situation (subsuming the situation). Obviously I am not the whole situation. Nobody could be the whole situation who doesn’t remember what happened before they were born. And usually if people claim to remember what happened before they were born, it’s living one life at a time, not all of them. And ask them to verify it.

Prediction. Ecmandu is now going to claim that he is living all lives at the same time—or used to—and that it’s something everyone gets to do on a rotating basis. You’re welcome.

42

The I that we identify with is a very limited part of the organism. All the organs do what they do without our input. Yes we can control our heartbeat and breathing to a certain extent but it all happens in of itself. There’s a trillion cells doing a trillion things a second and the I we identify with struggles to rub the head and pat the belly at the same time. Science explains that for every one year of modernity (prefrontal cortex) the heind brain is responsible for 700 years of the evolution process. I understand the the new part of the brain is beneficial for us in the modern world as it’s responsible for accountability empathy and reasoning. Is it possible to give responsibility over to the rear brain and still semifunction in everyday life. It’s a very thin line between insanity and being accepted socially to some degree.

1 Like
43

You have a lot of nerve endings.

44

Looking back , ex post facto like a pretended catch up attempt, but it’s none of ‘that’
(What’s ’That’?

It is in a sense that what it is, and that syllogism is the most basic signal of an intending relationship, that can not reconstruct it’s self, for the content of the double edge is nothing but a movement to cut, the light from the darkness, the good from bad, infact all conceivable apparent contraries.

A counter measure against this differentiation is the integration after the cut, but it is not simply an integration but a reintegration followed by a de-differentiation. It creates the image, during the cut, the imagination follows .

Reconstruction begins right after the Golden mean is fractured, the image it’s self changes to an overrated out of sequence(sync) disproportionate degree, or conversely underrated so that a naively unrealistic pressured compression -to absurd levels- such as, when a cosmological star or supernova dies, a black hole is formed, and sucks the very visibility out of it’s existence, perhaps creating tunnels to venture to other worlds, ?

Such travel are really conduits and work on both levels at once, and at the non existent time while they are in sync, it (That) takes place, axiomatically, in & through & for It’Self, so It can be eternally sustained by It’Self.

Messages from There, through apparent hidden coded signals, but present sentinence have developed only to Beings( or people) as advanced as Brahman, and reconstruction can only occur through ‘Secret Knowledge’

45

The triune ballast of the self=other have always existed together. We approach but never arrive. And yet we are already in them and they are already in us. And switched places with us to give us their power as ballast.

Heaven if we say Yes. Otherwise, our will be done.

46

Colossians 1-16

47

3 posts were split to a new topic: Rachmaninov Concerto Pour Piano No. 3

48

@PZR are y’dead?

49

Pardon if this is already shared above:

Ecmandu’s Noahic…

https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/search?q=rainbow%20rule%20%40ecmandu

50

“all things considered”

So, This means you treat the other as self even if the “ceteris paribus“ (sufficient) conditions are not met. You have to faith it — faithing it is the sufficient condition.

Think of it like being the vocalist supported by the pianist who follows your lead. You have to lead. That requires faith that the pianist will follow. You can’t wait for the pianist to do their part.

And even if the pianist drops the beat, you just keep singing and let them catch up.

52

Sorry, Ishthus, the content it’self is invisible ‘to me’

So guess not really understood as well

Sorry

53

Discuss lack of understanding your own innuendo in your own head (pray about it), & not with me. Thththththanx.

(Unless you are a sock puppet of one Jason Teague, are lying on purpose, signed an informed consent form to et cetera, and we have 500 brain children together. Then I still won’t explain. In a serious manner.)

Stay on the OP or go away.

54

For ages been meaning to read ‘The Visible and The Invisible, just found, in good faith, that’s it is merely a manuscript; plan to glean trough it at least begin the begin.

55

Maybe start a new thread if you find it isn’t relevant to OP.

56

I think it’s relevant, and/or need to convince you that I believe it is?

57

Or maybe a need exists to convince myself believe I need to convince you of relevance without really reading into the MS rather then gleaning through it’s title?

I think that’s plausible for that idea whose name I can’t remember against ALL odds, , that ideas so closely connected tend to accentuate the positive out come, as regards to fate in the subtle difference between odd occurances or strange ones, and ‘Oddity’ in it’s self?

This slight difference may account for thousands (Nicherin: 3000 to be exact) angels dancing on the head of a pin-or something like). Enough difference to flip a row of dominos in a prescribed circle. No, by all means, all things are connectable, everything has some semblance of rekevance, thanks Ishthus , trying to make more, not less sense.

58

I think that you are right here. and a non relevance issue is more an objective criteria and on that basis I would be systemically open to a kind of censure which had a preceeding similar type of thing , on my part, so I may start a new post, but not anytime soon, at least until I have found and read the manuscript.

Thanks for pointing this out to me.

59

Old: Answered criticisms of Golden Rule

I wish the links in the OP all worked.

60

Balance this:

with this:

An order that violates self=other (consent) is no order at all.