This three-part (Moral) Truth Litmus tells us when a particular (moral/ethical) theory or model is artificial (versus anchored in or descriptive of reality), when that theory or model fails any part of the litmus:
(L1) Part 1: Substantial (Universal Subjectivity, or Objectivity) Aspect: A (moral) theory/model must hold for all or none. (person=person)
(L2) Part 2: Existential Demonstration Aspect: A (moral) theory/model must be demonstrated in reality, not created in divergence from reality. (existential import)
(L3) Part 3: Essential Question Aspect: A (moral) theory/model must define the answer to a question (“How and why should a person(s) be or behave with the other and self (person[s])?”).
If no theory/model passes all three parts of the litmus, there is no (moral) truth.
Being discovered in/by every culture in history is good for part 1 (treat every person/other as a person/self, or the golden rule), but to pass part 2, you need a being whose essence is demonstrated (exists its essence), because no mere human (individually or culturally) does that.
Compare: the three axioms in Theatetus, Newton’s laws of motion, and the three laws of thermodynamics… and my entire thing on harmonic triads. 
Meno_ (now posting as @Meno4) referred me to this deep in the unsearchable caverns of ILP & a second listening (well… review of slides—I really need to rewatch) unveils a triad:
assertion (yellow), direction (blue), and force (red)
If you consider them as distinctions within a whole, rather than as incompatibly dichotomous, he (Michael Schmitz) may agree they form a triad.
red: ~1, 1 empty/full (never/impossible) or (always/necessary)
blue: 0 (default good/baseline) (self=other)
yellow: % anywhere in the middle (contingent) “increasing toward fullness or decreasing/nihilating away from fullness”
in order to know where you’re at, you need to know the end that has always been
complete before it started
heh
Blue CHOICE: Independent variable: The one the experimenter changes.
Yellow MALLEABLE CHARACTER: Dependent variable: What changes in response to the independent variable.
Red STAYS: Controlled variables: Factors that are kept constant to ensure accurate results.
The definitions are generic… googled.
Got it, but how!? (?!)
Utellme
As a probability function?
I was gonna reflect on that in relation to what the West’s mandate is on fear, that being contrary to fearless facing to
The fear of the shadow taking over the calm advance of the tittle, that is people want to exist even within the boundaries of the limits
Out of which no retreat is possible. Since in is beginning to look out, and the nihil has retracted undramatically
In democratically into the cinch
Where from prayers of the sea seem to animate out of
The paralysis setting on, as the empire crumbles,
Again and again
NAND that miracle,
If an inducement really from outside its periphery does take hold
That is, can another Barbarossa prevent it again?
Familial and familiar connections again intersect brazenly, and who dare not go for it again?
In the face of condemnation and a spiteful in His face?
Teach don’t drop me for this cause the other may …
And since eternal repetition is assured because of the end of hysteria requires endless timelessness by virtue of the social replication of individual widening of the lapse of memory
And everybody thus eternally wishes to exist, or condemned to
Therefore his must realize the necessity for his alter ego.
There is no two way about it, the question is not between To be , or knot, the question reduces to the inviolability of this here eternity, and that’s that
Everything not being in view , is that within some other view, where I is all is eyed as the lack within the shadow of the spit hare, and it’s necessary it takes time out, so.
So, no problems only solutions, to them being scared. Cats.
The only way beck is fated to belief.
I dunno, run it by Shirley, get back to me.
Did that , she participates in that magic miracle, , dunno either, but tech is that without which, memory can not be reclaimed, and that kind of eternity may break consensus between the three parallel flows trying to stay on course.
.
Hedging your bets…? m’kay
You think he should bet on you?
You’re the one needs to walk away.
If this was real, you should pity Shirley, & drop out of the School of Hard Knocks, cuz it taught you nothing.
.
Are you all not amused
…by the show I didn’t start
I think it a ruse
…so not been taking any of it to heart.