The Harmonic Triads

Love (essence/life, why) is not love (being/truth, what/who) without love (existence/action, how demonstration). (Rom. 2:13, John 2:14-20, Matt. 7:21, 24-27, Luke 8:21, John 3:17)

Love (existence/action, sense of duty demonstration) is not love (true being, character/virtue) without love (life essence, values). (Hosea 6:6, Is. 29:13, Ez. 33:31, 1 Sam.15:22, Matt. 15:7-9)

Love (true being, correct conception) is not love (existence/action, good will demonstration) without love (life essence, great experience). (1 Cor. 13:2, Luke 6:45, 8:18)

If you can read this, you might need your head examined:

Where I’m still at, basically, but with a bit more vocab (thanks, Copilot, for practicans/practicandum).

exPLANation… sorry

Belief is up top, in case you were looking for it.

You can program shared experiences with computer language/code, you can genetically modify DNA language/code that produces humans who communicate/share experiences.

How blind??? Read the whole chapter & the next.

Plato’s Divided Line

@Jakob check my work

Red: Belief/Opinion/Doxa (feels/hungers for eikones of good, beautiful, true)

Blue: Episteme/Pistis (handles/fashions techne appearances/revelations of good, beautiful, true)

Yellow: Understanding, Noesis (mentally grasps/operates in accordance/discordance with eide of good, beautiful, true)

shipness predicate (valuing/enjoying)

is not

ship category (being/understanding)

without

shipping example (doing/demonstrating)

Take this with two grains of salt:


If it is wrong, please teach/tutor me.

The first reply to this^ thread links to a conversation with Copilot that combines the four causes into a harmonic triad (not that I haven’t already done that previously, but Copilot basically backs me up on it and also offers constructive criticism).

Related:

disharmonic (or dissonant, discordant) triads:

So um, I uh….. ¡BOO!

Oh hey there.

So. 15 characters

the illegible words up there are goal/effect

I don’t know where this lands, it came up, while searching harmonic triads, but here: it fits, was gonna go to the end and to fit the pre established pattern of mine of beginning on the end at the end, while reverse thinking not that unusual, the way Koreans write! Or read backwards( doesn’t prove the backwardness of paradoxes specially memo’s.

So. Could not decide in the triple slot what to put in which, current events, into the second or third, writing for writin’s sake into the first or second , and psychology into the second or third, so toss a coin,and mix colors with positive reinforcement so resembling Wittgenstein.

So let it fall, naturally, like they had a willful mind of their own, like Mr. Reagan used to trickle it down.

But his emulsion Mr. Trump is continuing in the same vein, kinda, and Dr. Moakanin agreed with the idea that boundary situations expand logarhytmically, at ever increasing rates of relative motion. FDR warned of how fear and de-differentiation work and it parallels kind of a neuropathic compression, where neuropsychiatry is fast replacing the early days, with Russians doing inhumane things to our best befriended canines.

So the proper boundary to start with is Greenland, and how such expropriation impinges on the individual psyche, that tour’de force which brought us here, unwillingly, as Nietzcre knew, that he in merely describing states of affairs, is invariably changing the course , of not only of history, but also the course of participants, , mystically bound by and into various states of territoriality, as dogs, politicians and linguists tend to do.

Then the boundaries of these types can in fact bring about the fear left by the supposed exit of Divine Ordinance, and bury their fear in a hallucinated reality,which when shared remove these terrors only by the use of a rationalized calculated agreement, that the psychopathalogical plenum, is irreducible , as the phenomenological is irreducible to the phenomenal.

So Greenland, does it have strategic significance, or just merely the sign of a little dog wagging his tail, in a burst of poetic license? The best bet would be, that the interconnective expose would make a fertile ground to incite art of extensive, yet aggressive growth, if not retarded by by passing gut level concerns, basically anal, and reroute it, toward the crest of the lotus flower.

So, the placing of the three parte triad, needs to be incised into the the first state, and consummately , invariably AND concurrently into all three states, in describing!

I don’t have much time, but I’ll drop this link:

and this:

That is actually a more efficient style of writing because you don’t have to drag anything all the way across the page or canvas or whatever medium you’re working on. However, if you’re the one reading it, it is not a very efficient style of reading, if the medium can be held in your hands, or must be read from standing position, and the medium is too big for you to be able to turn upside down to read it. So we made the turn at some point to consider the reader, didn’t we?

LOL, and thank you for it, and vow not to play ispy any more.

I bet you can’t even control it. I bet you’re a captive audience.

Well, get ready for information overload, bub.

True it is quite a bunch , out of hell, but dint somebody try proving it mathematically and failed?
Plus if Einstein said God doesn’t play with marbles, lest if tried they would loose them?

I really shy at the preposterous quick fixed learning which I can not even reconstroct in simple guide to the galaxies form and that’s just the point; mankind back at the cave’s haunting dark entrance , depending on the reinvention of belief.

The sign says: Believe or you shall die.(worse then never having been borne.

Just saying, pls

1 Like